UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

SCHEDULE 14-A14A

(Rule 14a-101)

INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT

SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

 

Filed by the Registrantx

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant¨

 

Check the appropriate box:

 

¨Preliminary Proxy Statement ¨Confidential, for use of the Commission Only (as
xDefinitive Proxy Statement  Only (as permitted by Rule 14(a)-6(e)(2))
¨Definitive Additional Materials   
¨Soliciting Material Pursuant to Section 240.14a-12   

SEACOAST BANKING CORPORATION OF FLORIDA

(Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

 

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than Registrant)

 

Payment of Filing Fee (check the appropriate box):

 

xNo fee required

 

¨Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and 0-11

 

1)Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

2)Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

3)Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (Set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined.):

4)Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

5)Total fee paid:

 

¨Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

 

¨Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

 

1)Amount Previously Paid:

2)Form, Schedule, or Registration Statement No.:

3)Filing Party:

4)Date Filed:

 

 

 

April 9, 2014Proxy Statement

2017

 

TO THE SHAREHOLDERS OF
SEACOAST BANKING CORPORATION OF FLORIDA:

 

You are cordially invited to attend the 2014 Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida, which will be held at the Wolf Technology Center, 2400 S.E. Salerno Road, Stuart, Florida, on Wednesday, May 21, 2014, at 3:00 P.M., Local Time.

 

Details regarding the business to be conducted at the meeting are described in the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (“Notice”) you received in the mail and in this proxy statement. We have also made available a copy of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period year ended ending December 31, 2013 (“Annual Report”) which we encourage you to read. The Annual Report includes our audited financial statements and provides information about our business.

We have elected to provide access to our proxy materials over the internet under the Securities and Exchange Commission’s “Notice and Access” rules. We are continually focused on improving the way people connect with information, and believe that providing our proxy materials over the internet increases the ability of our shareholders to connect with the information they need, while reducing the environmental impact of our annual meeting. You may also request to receive a printed or emailed set of proxy materials. If you want more information, please see the “Questions and Answers” section of this proxy statement.

Your vote is important. Whether or not you plan to attend the meeting, we hope you will vote as soon as possible. You may vote over the internet, as well as by telephone. You also may vote your shares by requesting a paper proxy card and completing, signing and returning it by mail. Please review the instructions on each of your voting options described in this proxy statement, as well as in the Notice you received in the mail. By voting prior to the meeting, you will help us ensure that we have a quorum and that your preferences will be expressed on the matters that are being considered. If you are able to attend the meeting, you may vote your shares in person, even if you have previously voted by another means by revoking your proxy vote at any time prior to its exercise. .

Thank you for your ongoing support. We look forward to your participation in our annual meeting.

Sincerely,
Dennis S. Hudson, III
Chairman & Chief Executive Officer

 

815 Colorado Avenue
Stuart, FloridaFL 34994

 

NOTICE OF 2017 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
TO BE HELD ON MAY 21, 2014

 

Notice is hereby given that the 2014 Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Thursday, May 25, 2017

3:30 p.m. Eastern Time

Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida (“Seacoast” or the “Company”) will be heldhold its 2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders at the Wolf TechnologyFounder’s Room, Orlando Science Center, 2400 S.E. Salerno Road, Stuart,777 E. Princeton Street, Orlando, Florida, 32803, on Wednesday,Thursday, May 21, 2014,25, 2017 at 3:00 P.M., Local Time (collectively, with any adjournments or postponements, the “Annual Meeting”), for30 p.m. Eastern Time.

ITEMS OF BUSINESS

To vote on the following purposes:proposals:

 

1.Election of Directors.To re-electelect four Class III directors elect two Class II directors and elect one Class III director (“Proposal 1”);

 

2.Ratification of Appointment of Independent Auditor.To ratify the appointment of Crowe HorwathCroweHorwath LLP as independent auditors for Seacoast for the fiscal year ending December 31, 20142017 (“Proposal 2”);

 

3.Advisory (Non-binding) Vote on Compensation of Named Executive Officers.To allow shareholders to endorse or not endorsehold anadvisory vote on the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers as disclosed in this Proxy Statement (“Proposal 3”);

 

4.To transact such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting and any adjournment or postponement thereof.

 

The Proxy Statement explains these proposals in greater detail. We urge you to read these materials carefully.RECORD DATE

 

Only shareholdersYou can vote if you were a shareholder of record and beneficial owners of the Company’s Common Stock as ofon the close of business onMarch 20, 2014 are entitled to noticeon March 23, 2017, with is the record date for the annual meeting. This Notice of and to vote at, the 2017 Annual Meeting or any adjournments thereof. All shareholders, whether or not they expect to attendof Shareholders and the Annual Meeting in person,accompanying proxy statement are requested to votesent by internet or telephone, or by requesting a paper proxy card and completing, signing and returning it by mail.order of the Board of Directors.

 

 By Order of the Board of Directors
 
 Dennis S. Hudson, III
 Chairman & Chief Executive Officer

 

April 9, 20146, 2017

TABLE OF

CONTENTS

 

YOUR VOTE IS VERY IMPORTANT.

Whether or not you planGENERAL INFORMATON

1
Annual Meeting Information1
How to attend the meeting, please take the time to vote by following the telephone or internet voting procedures described on the notice mailed to you, or by requesting a paper proxy card and returning it promptly. If you attend the meeting, you may vote in person if you wish, even if you have previously voted, by revoking your proxy vote at any time prior to its exercise.

Table of Contents

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE PROXY SOLICITATION MATERIALS AND THE PROXY SOLICITATIONCast Your Vote1
  Proxy Materials1
PROXY SUMMARYWhy am I receiving these proxy materials?13
What is included in the proxy materials?1
What information is contained in this proxy statement?1
Why did I receive a “Notice of the Internet Availability of Proxy Materials” but no proxy materials?2
How can I access the proxy materials over the internet?2
Will the Company use the Notice and Access method to furnish proxy materials to its shareholders in the future?2
What if I prefer to receive paper or email copies of the proxy materials?2
 Voting InformationIntroduction3
What matters will be voted on at the Annual Meeting?2016 Performance Highlights3
How do I vote (shareholder of record)?3
What if my shares are held in street name?3
How will my shares of stock held in Seacoast’s Retirement Savings Plan or Employee Stock Purchase Plan be voted?4
How will my shares of Common Stock held in Seacoast’s Dividend  Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan be voted?4
What does it mean if I receive more than one proxy card or Notice?4
What if I change my mind after I have voted?4
How many shares must be present to hold the Annual Meeting?5
What if a quorum is not present at the Annual Meeting?5
What is the recommendation of the Board of Directors with regard to each proposal?5
What options do I have in voting on each proposal?5
What are the voting requirements with regard to each proposal?6
What is “householding” and how does it affect me?6
Who will pay the expenses of proxy solicitation?6
Where do I find the voting results of the Annual Meeting?Executive Compensation Program Highlights7
PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORSProgram Changes for 20168
 GeneralSummary of Voting Matters and Board Recommendations8
 Manner for Voting ProxiesOur Director Nominees9
Board and Governance Highlights Nominees to be Elected at the Annual Meeting910
Board Composition Directors Whose Terms Extend Beyond the Annual Meeting11
Our Corporate Governance Framework14
  Non-Director
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AT SEACOAST15
Corporate Governance Principles and Practices15
Governance Policies15
Board Independence15
Board Leadership Structure16
Non-Management Executive OfficersSessions19
Committee Structure and Other Matters19
CORPORATE GOVERNANCEShareholder Engagement20
 Corporate Governance Framework20
 Board Independence21
 Board Leadership Structure21
 Director Nominating ProcessManagement Succession Planning and Development22
 Shareholder CommunicationsExecutive Officers24
 Corporate Governance Guidelines24
 Code of Conduct and Ethics24
 Board Meeting Attendance24
 Risk Oversight24
 Succession Planning & Management Development25
 Board CommitteesStock Ownership26
Director Nomination Process Executive Officers2826
 Management Stock Ownership28
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION & ANALYSISBoard Evaluation Process29
 OverviewBoard Meetings and Board Committees29
Board Meeting Attendance29
Annual Meeting Attendance29
Board Committees30
The Board’s Role in Strategy and Risk Oversight33
Audit Committee Report34

 

i

 

OWNERSHIP OF OUR COMMON SHARESSummary35
Principal Shareholders3035
Ownership of Directors and Executive Officers37
 Governance and Evolving Compensation Practices
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION3040
 
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS40
Executive Summary40
2016 Performance Considerations40
2016 NEO Pay40
Our Executive Compensation Design Priorities and Prohibitions42
Summary of Compensation Decisions in 201643
2016 Equity Awards46
Overview of Executive Compensation48
Compensation Philosophy and Objectives3148
Determining Executive Compensation3249
Executive Compensation Framework HighlightsOverview51
2016 Executive Compensation Actions52
Compensation Paid to Our CEO in 201653
Compensation Paid to Other Named Executive Officers in 201654
Other Elements of the 2016 Compensation Program for Executive Officers3357
Elements of the 2013 Compensation Program for Executive Officers34
Risk Analysis of Executive Compensation3759
Risk Analysis of Retail Sales Incentive PlansClawback Policy3859
Clawback PolicyHedging Policy3861
Hedging & Pledging Policy61
Stock Ownership Guidelines3861
Impact of Deduction Limit3962
2017 Compensation ActionsResults of Shareholder Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation3963
  
2013 COMPENSATION AND GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE REPORT4064
 Executive Compensation40
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION TABLES201365
2016 Summary Compensation Table4065
20132016 Components of All Other Compensation Table4166
20132016 Grants of Plan-Based Awards4267
Employment and Change in Control Agreements4268
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End 201320164572
2013 Options2016 Option Exercises and Stock Vested4674

ii

20132016 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation4774
Executive Deferred Compensation Plan4775
20132016 Other Potential Post-Employment Payments49
2013 Director Compensation51
2013 Director Compensation Table52
2013 Director Fees Earned or Paid in Cash53
Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan53
COMPENSATION & GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE REPORT5477
  
CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS AND BUSINESS RELATIONSHIPSPROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS5579
GeneralRelated Party Transactions5579
Manner for Voting ProxiesCertain Family Relationships5680
Nominees to be Re-Elected at the Annual Meeting81
COMPENSATION & GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATIONDirectors Whose Terms Extend Beyond the Annual Meeting5685
  
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF MANAGEMENT AND CERTAIN BENEFICIAL HOLDERSDIRECTOR COMPENSATION5795
Non-Employee Director Compensation StructurePrincipal Shareholders5795
Lead Independent Director Compensation and AgreementOwnership of Directors and Executive Officers5896
Director Stock Ownership PolicySection 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance96
2016 Director Compensation Table6097
Stock Awards and Options Granted to Directors in 201699
Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan100
  
PROPOSAL 2: RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITOR61102
Relationship with Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm102
AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORTIndependent Registered Public Accounting Firm’s Fees62103
Pre-Approval Policy103
  
RELATIONSHIP WITH INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM63
Change in Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm63
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Fees63
Pre-Approval Policy64
PROPOSAL 3: ADVISORY (NON-BINDING) VOTE ON COMPENSATION OF NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS (SAY-ON-PAY)65104
  
OTHER INFORMATION105
SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR 2015Certain Transactions and Business Relationships66105
Related Party Transactions105
Certain Family Relationships107
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance107
Other Matters107
Shareholder Proposals for 2018108
  
OTHER MATTERSADDITIONAL VOTING INFORMATION66109
  
APPENDIX A – INFORMATION REGARDING NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURESA-1
 
OTHER INFORMATIONLOCATION OF THE 2017 ANNUAL MEETING66Inside Back Cover

 

iiiii

 

PROXY STATEMENT
FOR
ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
OF SEACOAST BANKING CORPORATION OF FLORIDA
MAY 21, 2014

GENERAL INFORMATION

Annual Meeting Information

Date, Time and Place:Thursday, May 25, 2017, at 3:30 P.M. Eastern Time at the Founder’s Room, OrlandoScience Center, 777 E. Princeton Street, Orlando, Florida 32803. The Board of DirectorsAnnual Meeting shall be referred to herein as the “Meeting” or the “Annual Meeting.”

Street Name Holders:If your shares of Seacoast Banking Corporationcommon stock are held in a bank, brokerage or otherinstitutional account (which is commonly referred to as “street name”), you are a beneficial owner of Florida, a Florida corporation (“Seacoast” orthese shares, but you are not the “Company”) is soliciting proxiesrecord holder. If your shares are held in street name, you are invited to be votedattend the Annual Meeting; however, to vote your shares in person at the Annual Meetingmeeting, you must request and obtain a power of Shareholdersattorney or other authority from the bank, broker or other nominee who holds your shares and bring it with you to be held on Wednesday, May 21, 2014, at 3:00 P.M. Local Time (collectively,submit with any adjournments or postponements, the “Annual Meeting”)your ballot at the Wolf Technology Center, 2400 S.E. Salerno Road, Stuart, Floridameeting. In addition, you may vote your shares before the meeting by phone or over the Internet by following the instructions set forth below or, if you received a voting instruction form from your brokerage firm, by mail by completing, signing and returning the form you received. Your voting instruction form will set forth whether Internet or telephone voting is available to you. Although most brokers and nominees offer telephone and Internet voting, availability and specific processes will depend on their voting arrangements. We encourage you to record your vote through the Internet if such process is available to you.

How to View Proxy Materials Online

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the purposes set forth in2017 Shareholder Meeting

Our 2017 Proxy Statement and the attached Notice of Meeting. On or about April 9, 2014, the notice of meeting, this proxy statement, Seacoast’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period year ended December 31, 2013 (“Annual Report”),which includes our financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013, and a proxy card or voting instruction card (collectively,2016 (referred to collectively herein as the “proxy materials”) are first being made available for review online and paper copies sent to each shareholder who has requested such materials.at: www.proxyvote.com or at www.seacoastbanking.com/GenPage.aspx?IID=100425&GKP=325642.

 

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE PROXY SOLICITATION MATERIALS

AND THE PROXY SOLICITATION

Proxy Materials

Q: Why am I receiving these proxy materials?

A: Our Board of Directors has made these materials available to you on the internet or, at your request, has delivered printed proxy materials to you, because on March 20, 2014, the record date set for the Annual Meeting (the “Record Date”), you owned shares of Seacoast’s common stock, $0.10 par value (“Common Stock”). Only holders of record of our Common Stock at the close of business on the Record Date are entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting. Each holder of Common Stock is entitled to one vote for each share of Common Stock owned as of the Record Date. As of the Record Date, there were 25,985,761 shares of Common Stock issued and outstanding.

As a shareholder, you are invited to attend the Annual Meeting and are requested to vote on the proposals summarized below under “What matters will be voted on at the Annual Meeting” and described in greater detail elsewhere in this proxy statement. Seacoast’s Board of Directors knows of no other business that will be presented for consideration at the Annual Meeting other than the matters described in this proxy statement.

Q: What is included in the proxy materials?

A: The proxy materials include:

The notice of meeting and our proxy statement for the 2014 Annual Meeting;

Our 2013 Annual Report, which includes our financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013; and

A proxy card or a voting instruction card for the Annual Meeting.

Q: What information is contained in this proxy statement?

A: This proxy statement describes the matters that will be presented for consideration by shareholders at the Annual Meeting, the voting process, the compensation of our directors and certain of our executive officers, corporate governance, and certain other required information. It also gives you background information concerning the proposals to assist you in making an informed decision. Please read it carefully.

Q: Why did I receive a “Notice of the Internet Availability of Proxy Materials”, but no proxy materials?

A: We have furnished our proxy materialsmailed to certain shareholders via thea notice of internet under the “Notice and Access” method permitted by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). Therefore, unless you request hard copies, you will not receive printed copiesavailability of the proxy materials. Instead,the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice”), which was mailed to most of our shareholdersmaterials on or about April 9, 2014, instructs you as to6, 2017. This notice contains instructions on how to access and review all of the proxy materials on the internet. The Noticenotice also contains instructions on how to submit your proxy on the internet or by phone, or, if you prefer, to obtain a paper or email copy of the proxy materials.

 

This process provides a convenient and timely method for shareholders to obtain the proxy materials and vote, reduces the printing and mailing expenses paid by the Company, and reduces the environmental impact of producing the proxy materials.

Q: How can I access the proxy materials over the internet?HOW TO CAST YOUR VOTE

 

The Notice, proxy card or voting instruction card will contain instructionsYou may vote common shares that you owned as of the close of business on how to:

View our proxy materialsMarch 23, 2017, which is the record date for the Annual Meeting on the internet and vote your shares; and

Instruct us to send our future proxy materials to you electronically by email.

Our proxy materials are also available on our Investor Relations website at:Meeting.

 

https://www.snl.com/IRWebLinkX/GenPage.aspx?IID=100425&GKP=210302

Choosing to receive your future proxy materials by email will save us the cost of printing and mailing documents to you, and will conserve natural resources. If you choose to receive future proxy materials by email, you will receive an email next year with instructions containing a link to those materials and a link to the proxy voting site. Your election to receive proxy materials by email will remain in effect until you terminate it.

Q: Will the Company use the Notice and Access method to furnish proxy materials to its shareholders in the future?

A: The Company may choose to continue to use the Notice and Access method to furnish proxy materials to its shareholders in the future. By reducing the amount of materials that the Company is required to print and mail, this method provides an opportunity for cost savings as well as conservation of natural resources. The Company will evaluate the cost savings, as well as the possible impact on shareholder participation, as it considers how to furnish proxy materials to our shareholders in the future.

Q: What if I prefer to receive paper or email copies of the materials?

A: If you prefer to receive paper or email copies of the materials, you can still do so. You may request a paper copy of the materials by (i) calling 1-800-579-1639; (ii) sending an e-mail to sendmaterial@proxyvote.com; or (iii) logging ontowww.ProxyVote.com. There is no charge to receive the materials by mail or email. If requesting material by e-mail, please send a blank e-mail with the 12 digit control number (located on the Notice) in the subject line.

The Company must provide paper copies via first class mail to any shareholder who, after receiving the Notice, nevertheless requests paper copies. Even if you do not request paper copies now, you will still have the right to request delivery of a free set of proxy materials upon receipt of any notice in the future. Because first class postage is significantly more expensive than bulk mail rates and because each such request must be processed on an individual basis, the cost of responding to a single request for paper copies is likely to be significantly greater than the per shareholder cost the Company previously incurred in delivering proxy materials in bulk. Therefore, requests for paper copies could undermine or eliminate expected cost savings associated with our decision to use the Notice and Access method of furnishing proxy materials.

By developing a database of shareholders who would prefer to continue receiving paper copies of proxy materials, the Company will be able to use the full set delivery option for these shareholders, while using the Notice and Access option for other shareholders. We believe this will significantly reduce the number of requests for paper copies that the Company will need to process on an individual basis going forward and will position the Company to better capture cost savings should we continue to use the Notice and Access method in the future. We appreciate your assistance in helping us develop this database.

Voting Information

Q: What matters will be voted on at the Annual Meeting?

A: You are being asked to vote on three proposals summarized as follows:

Proposal 1.To re-elect four Class III directors, elect two Class II directors and elect one Class III director;

Proposal 2.To ratify the appointment of Crowe Horwath LLP as independent auditors for Seacoast for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2014; and

Proposal 3.To allow shareholders to endorse or not endorse, on a non-binding basis, the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers as disclosed in this Proxy Statement.

These matters are more fully described in this proxy statement.

Q: How do I vote (shareholder of record)?

A: You are a shareholder of record if your shares of Common Stock are held in your name on the Record Date. If you are a beneficial owner of Common Stock held by a broker, bank or other nominee (which is commonly referred to as “street name”), please see the instructions in the following question.

Instructions for voting are found on the Notice and proxy card. After reviewing these instructions, please submit your proxy via telephone or through the Internet, or by completing and returning a written proxy card.  By submitting your proxy, you authorize the individuals named in it to represent you and vote your shares at the Annual Meeting in accordance with your instructions.  Your vote is important, and your shares can only be voted if you are present in personimportant. Whether or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting.To ensure your representation at the Annual Meeting, we recommend you vote by proxy even ifnot you plan to attend the Annual Meeting.Meeting, we hope you will vote as soon as possible. Please vote promptly using onereview the instructions on each of your voting options described in this proxy statement, as well as in the proxy delivery ornotice you received in the mail. By voting methods indicatedprior to the Meeting, you will help ensure that we have a quorum and that your preferences will be expressed on the Notice or proxy card.You canmatters that are being considered. If you are able to attend the Meeting, you may vote your shares in person, at the Annual Meeting even if you have previously provided a proxyvoted by another means by revoking theyour proxy vote at any time prior to its exercise.exercise, pursuant to the procedures specified in “Revocation of Proxies.”

1

You may vote by any of the following methods:

BY TELEPHONE:
You can vote by calling the number on your proxy card or voting instruction form, or provided on the website listed on your notice.
BY INTERNET:
You can vote online atwww.proxyvote.com
BY MAIL:
You also may vote your shares by requesting a paper proxy card and completing, signing and returning it by mail in the envelope provided.
IN PERSON:
You can vote in person at the Annual Meeting. If you hold your shares in street name, you must obtain a proxy from the record holder in order to vote in person.

For telephone and internet voting, you will need the 16-digit control number included in your notice, on your proxy card or in the voting instructions that accompanied your proxy materials.

 

If you vote by proxy, but do not provide voting instructions, yourFor shares represented by the proxy will be voted as recommended by our Board of Directors as indicated below under “What is the recommendation of the Board of Directors with regard to each proposal?” If any other matters are properly presented at the Annual Meeting for action, the persons named and acting as proxy will have the discretion to vote for you on these matters in accordance with their best judgment. We do not currently expect that any other matters will be properly presented for action at the Annual Meeting.

Q: What if my shares are held in street name?

A: If you are a beneficial owner and a broker, bank or other nominee is the record holder (which is commonly referred to as “street name”), then you received the Notice or proxy materials from the record holder. You have the right to direct your broker or nominee how to vote your shares, and such broker or other nominee is required to vote the shares in accordance with your instructions. Your broker or nominee should have given you instructions for you to provide direction on how to vote your shares. It will then be the record holder’s responsibility to vote your shares for you in the manner you direct.

Under the rules of various securities exchanges, brokers and other record holders may generally vote on discretionary or routine matters, but cannot vote on non-routine or non-discretionary matters, such as the election of directors, unless they have received voting instructions from the person for whom they are holding shares. Proposals 1 and 3 are considered non-routine matters, and cannot be voted on by your broker without your instructions. We therefore encourage you to provide directions to your broker as to how you want your shares voted on all matters to be brought before the Annual Meeting.  You should do this by carefully following the instructions your broker gives you.

If your shares are held in street name, you are invited to attend the Annual Meeting; however, you may not vote your shares of Common Stock held in street name in person at the Annual Meeting unless you request and obtain a power of attorney or other authority from your broker or other nominee who holds your shares and bring it to the Annual Meeting. Even if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting,employee plans, we ask that you vote in advance of the Annual Meeting in case your plans change.

Q: How will my shares of stock held in Seacoast’s Retirement Savings Plan or Employee Stock Purchase Plan be voted?

A: If you are a participant in Seacoast’s Retirement Savings Plan or Employee Stock Purchase Plan,must receive your voting instructions must be received byno later than 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on May 15, 201418, 2017 (the “cut-off date”) to be counted. When your voting instructions are received byOtherwise, you may vote up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time the cut-off date, your sharesday before the meeting date.

2

PROXY SUMMARY

Introduction

Our balanced growth strategy, which is focused on organic growth and completing value creating acquisitions in these plans will be votedgrowing markets, is delivering value for our shareholders.

In this section, we summarize 2016 performance highlights and other information contained elsewhere in this proxy statement. Please carefully review the information included throughout this proxy statement and as directed by you. For the shares in your account in Seacoast’s Retirement Savings Plan, if you do not submit your voting instructions by following the instructions on the Notice or proxy card, then the trustee of the Retirement Savings Plan will vote, or not vote, in its sole discretion, the shares of Common Stock in your account. For shares held in your accountprovided in the Employee Stock Purchase Plan, your shares will not be voted if2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K before you do not give voting instructions as to such shares by proxy.vote.

 

Q: How will my shares of Common Stock held in Seacoast’s Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan be voted?2016 Performance Highlights

A: If you are a participant in Seacoast’s Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan, follow the instructions on the Notice or proxy card to provide voting instructions to the Trustee. Shares held in your plan account will be combined and voted at the Annual Meeting in the same manner in which you voted those shares registered in your own name either by proxy or in person.

Q: What does it mean if I receive more than one proxy card or Notice?

A: It means that you have multiple holdings reflected inValue Creation for our stock transfer records and/or in accounts with brokers or other nominees. For example, you may hold some of your shares individually, some jointly with your spouse and some in trust for your children. Please follow the instructions on each Notice or proxy card to ensure that all of your shares are voted.

Q: What if I change my mind after I have voted?

A: If you hold your shares in your own name, you may revoke your proxy and change your vote at any time before the polls close at the Annual Meeting. You may do this by:Shareholders

 

·timely submitting another proxy via the telephone or internet;Seacoast continued to drive positive momentum in performance metrics, leading to sustained outperformance in total shareholder returns.

 

·delivering to Seacoast a written notice bearing a date later than the date of the proxy card, stating that you revoke the proxy, with such written notice to be sent to: 815 Colorado Avenue, P. O. Box 9012, Stuart, Florida 34995, Attention: Corporate Secretary;

·signing and delivering to Seacoast a proxy card relating to the same shares and bearing a later date; or

·attending the Annual Meeting and voting in person by written ballot, although attendance at the Annual Meeting will not, by itself, revoke a proxy.

Also, please note that if you have voted through your broker, bank or other nominee and you wish to change your vote, you must follow the instructions received from such entity to change your vote. 

 

Q: How many shares must be presentTotal return combines share price appreciation and dividends paid to hold the Annual Meeting?

A: To hold a vote on any proposal, a quorum must be present in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting. A quorum is a majority ofshow the total votes entitledreturn to be cast by the holders of the outstanding shares of Common Stock as of the Record Date.

Shares are counted as present at the Annual Meeting if the shareholder either:expressed as an annualized percentage.

 

·Seacoast’s industry leading performance is present and votes in person at the Annual Meeting;supported by five key themes:
ºOur balanced growth strategy is working. We are meeting the needs of our customers and generating strong returns for shareholders.
ºWe have a singular view of how we serve the customer, leveraging analytics to deepen and broaden relationships across all lines of business.
ºWe have a deep and talented management team and experienced Board that we believe is able to execute our strategy and deliver shareholder value.
ºWe have an enviable position in a strong Florida market.
ºWe are only in the early innings of our balanced growth strategy and have a clear roadmap to continue to create value.

3

 

·has voted by proxy via the telephone or Internet; orExecution of our strategy in 2016 produced outstanding results:
ºRevenues increased $35.3 million year over year to $177.4 million, reflecting significant franchise growth from $142.1 million in 2015.
ºNet income improved $7.1 million to $29.2 million from $22.1 million in 2015, and fully diluted earnings per share rose 18% to 78 cents a share from 66 cents in 2015. Adjusted net income1 surged 51% to $37.5 million from $24.9 million a year earlier, with adjusted diluted earnings per share rising 35 percent from 74 cents per share in 2015.
ºHouseholds we serve have grown to 95,591 from 66,826 in 2013, with Orlando households now representing nearly 22% of Seacoast’s overall households served, up from 3.9% in 2013.
ºLoans climbed $723 million, or 34%, from year-ago levels, and adjusting for acquisitions, loan growth rose 18%, or $377 million. Our Accelerate commercial banking delivery platform, which we invested in four years ago, has become a significant part of our business. Also, we continue to maintain a very granular loan portfolio with modest commercial real estate exposure.
ºOur adjusted efficiency ratio1 improved to 60.8% for fourth quarter 2016 from 69.1 percent in the fourth quarter 2015, and our adjusted return on average assets1 increased to nearly 1 percent, at 0.99%, from 0.75% in the fourth quarter a year ago. Our adjusted return on tangible common equity1increased to 13.1% at year end vs. 8.5 percent in the fourth quarter of 2015.

Our balanced growth strategy combines organic growth and select strategic M&A along with prudent risk management to deliver consistent results.

 

·Growth Highlights – Our balanced growth strategy has properly submittedled to strong results since January 2014.
oHousehold growth increased 11% organically, 44% including mergers and acquisitions
oDeposit growth increased 19% organically, 95% including mergers and acquisitions
oLoan growth increased 34% organically, 115% including mergers and acquisitions
oOur focus on business banking has led to a signed proxy card or other form190% increase in business loans outstanding since the beginning of written proxy.2014
oOur focus on deepening relationships with current customers has led to organic growth as well. Since the beginning of 2014:
·240% increase in loan sales to current customers
·107% increase in deposit accounts sold to current customers
·85% increase in debit cards sold to current customers

· Mergers and Acquisitions Highlights

oBankFIRST acquired October 2014
·IRR exceeded internal target of 19%
·Household growth in acquired branches = +15%
·Customer growth highlights
oAvg Services = +29%
oConsumer Installment Loans = +88%

 

In determining whether a quorum exists at the Annual Meeting for purposes of all matters1 Non-GAAP measure; refer to be voted on, all votes “for” or “against,” as well as all abstentions and broker non-votes, will be counted.Appendix A “broker non-vote” occurs when a nominee does not have discretionary voting power with respect to that proposal and has not received instructions from the beneficial owner.- Informtion Regarding Non-GAAP Financial Measures.

 

4

On March 20, 2014, the record date, there were 25,985,761 shares of Common Stock issued, outstanding and entitled to be voted, which were held by approximately 1,560 holders of record. Therefore, at least 12,992,881 shares need to be present at the Annual Meeting or represented by proxy in order for a quorum to exist.

oConsumer Lines of Credit = +24%
oDebit Cards = +15%
oMobile Banking = +294%
oGrand Bank acquired July 2015
·IRR exceeded internal target of 24%
·Household growth in acquired branches = 9%
·Customer growth highlights
oAvg Services = +12%
oDebit Cards = +15%
oMobile Banking = +70%
oOnline Banking = +25%
oFloridian Financial Group acquired March 2016
·Strengthened presence in Daytona and Orlando, along attractive I-4 Corridor
·Compelling financial metrics announced and on track
·Approximately 20% IRR
·Tangible book value dilution earn back of 4.2 years
·EPS accretion of $0.02 in 2016
·Acquisition closed and converted in March 2016
oBMO Harris Orlando Banking Operations acquired June 2016
·Further strengthened franchise in Orlando, including business banking
·Compelling financial metrics announced and on track
·IRR in excess of 20%
·More than 6% accretive to 2016 EPS
·Acquisition closed and converted in June 2016
oFull impact of cost savings were realized in Q4 2016
oLooking ahead, we anticipate further gains upon the successful integration of GulfShore Bancshares, which we expect to close during the second half of 2017.
·Our conservative risk profile positions us well for sustainable value creation
oWhile the total loan portfolio has grown by 138% since 2011, the average loan size has decreased by 42% in the same time period. We operate a granular, diversified loan portfolio.
oThe top 10 loan relationships represent 40% of total risk based capital, down by 35% since 2011
·Our approach to Commercial Real Estate is very different than our Florida peers
·CRE loans as a percent of total capital remain relatively flat and intentionally below Florida peers, at 200% vs 271% for our peer group as of Q3 2016.

 

5

Directors

Our methodical transformation continues with strong evidence of success and executive officerssignificant implications over time.

·Digital connectivity and big data are disrupting all industries, including community banking, ushering in the age of the customer. Customers are better informed and expect companies to revolve around them, not the other way around. Thus, convenience has been fundamentally redefined, to the benefit of banks that take advantage of transformational opportunities.
·We recognized the implications early and, through efforts aimed at providing digital/electronic delivery to customers and through development of industry-leading technology and analytics, we have begun to drive growth and reduce costs.
oToday more than 80% of everything being done at a Seacoast branch can be accomplished by mobile phone or ATM. We have invested in our 24/7 call center, ATMs, ATM capabilities and use of mobile, while consolidating our high fixed-cost branch network.
oWe continue to focus on driving routine transactions to lower cost channels and have made significant progress. We expect to process more routine transactions through non-branch channels (e.g. mobile, ATMs) than branch channels by the middle of 2017. Our ATMs and mobile app today process the equivalent servicing volume of 18 branches combined.
oOver 30% of eligible consumer accounts are using Seacoast’s mobile app, following its launch only three years ago.
oMore than 37% of all physical checks are deposited outside the branch as of February 2017, up from 30% in February 2016, driven by steady adoption of mobile check deposit along with our ATM network.
oOur progress in digital delivery is leading to tangible results for shareholders. Since year-end 2012, deposits have increased 99% while branches have only increased by 27%. This has led to a significant improvement in deposits per branch, now up to $75 million compared to $48 million at year-end 2012.

The Florida Economy continues to provide tailwinds for our franchise.

·Florida is projected to be the 16th largest economy in the world in 2019 based on World Bank rankings.
·Florida’s economy is accelerating at a faster pace than the nation for next four years and becoming a $1 trillion economy in 2018
·Florida surpassed New York in 2014 to become the nation’s third largest state.
·Florida is also among the nation’s top ten fastest growing states.
·Florida offers a diversified economy, with growth in education, health services, leisure & hospitality, trade, transportation, utilities, construction and manufacturing.

We have a skilled and engaged employee base, with multiple awards over the Company beneficially hold approximately 6,593,999 shares of Common Stock, or 25.3 percent of all the votes entitled to be cast at the Annual Meeting.past year.

·Our Director of Business Technology & Data Management was recognized by Ventana Research as a Business Technology leadership award winner in Business Intelligence.

6

·Our Digital Marketing Manager was recognized by Google as a success story and also recognized as one of three Social Media Leaders of 2016 by Independent Banker Magazine.
·We’ve been granted two provisional patents based on innovation developments by our analytics and technology teams.

And our focus on customers is what makes us special.

·90 years of experience has firmly established our brand and allowed us to hone our convenience service model.
·Our customer satisfactions scores remain high. 76% of our consumer customers have recommended Seacoast to a friend, and 78% of our small business customers have done so as well.
·Gallup indicates that “a customer who is fully engaged represents an average 23%premium in terms of share of wallet, profitability, revenue, and relationship growth compared with the average customer. In stark contrast, an actively disengaged customer represents a 13%discount in those same measures.”1

Q: What if a quorum is not present at the Annual Meeting?Executive Compensation Program Highlights

 

A: If a quorumThe Compensation and Governance Committee (“CGC”) is not present atcommitted to aligning our compensation strategies with the scheduled timeneeds of our evolving business strategy, good governance and effective risk management practices, and our efforts to generate superior returns for our long-term shareholders. To this end, we emphasize pay-for-performance emphasis in our executive compensation programs and, ultimately, the Annual Meeting, a majorityalignment of the shareholders present or represented by proxy may adjourn the Annual Meeting until a quorum is present. The time and place of the adjourned Annual Meetingmanagement with shareholder interests. Significant value only will be announced at the time of the adjournment,realized if any,we exceed our long-term performance expectations and nodeliver meaningful value creation for our shareholders.

Our executive compensation strategy strongly aligns our CEO and other notice will be given. An adjournment will have no effect on the business that may be conducted at the Annual Meeting. If the Annual Meeting is adjourned more than 120 days after the date fixed for the original Annual Meeting, the Board of Directors must fix a new Record Date to determine the shareholders entitled to vote at the adjourned Annual Meeting.executives with long-term shareholder interests.

·Base salary is the sole form of fixed compensation. For our CEO, base salary represents approximately one-half of total pay.
·In general, variable or “at risk” pay approximates or exceeds greater than one-half of the pay for our named executive officers.
·All incentive compensation for FY16 performance was paid in the form of equity awards granted in April 2017.
·The majority of our variable pay opportunity is delivered as performance-based stock that only can be earned if we attain or exceed minimal levels of acceptable financial or market-based goals, as approved by the CGC.
·Performance-based stock is our primary form of incentive compensation, ensuring that pay outcomes closely align with shareholder returns.

1 Gallup Business Journal, July 22, 2014

7

Q: What is the recommendation of the Board of Directors with regard to each proposal?Program Changes in 2016

 

·Introduction of individual performance scorecards for all of our executives which, among other things, included our EPS performance goal of $1.00.
·Short-term cash bonuses for FY16 performance were replaced with performance-based stock awards for the CEO and performance-contingent stock awards for the other executive officers, which were granted in April 2017. The CGC took this action in response to guidance we received from our shareholders that they would like management to increase their direct ownership in the Company and to enhance the holding power (retention) and risk sensitivity of our incentive strategies.

A:

Please refer to theCompensation Discussion and AnalysisandThe Executive Compensation Tables in this proxy statement for additional details.

Summary of Voting Matters and Board of Directors of Seacoast believes the proposals described herein are in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders and, accordingly, unanimously recommends that shareholders vote as follows:Recommendations

 

ItemProposalManagementBoard Voting
Recommendation
Vote
Required
1Election of Four Class III DirectorsFOR ALLPlurality vote*
2Ratification of Appointment of Crowe Horwath LLP as Independent Auditor for 2017FORAffirmative vote of a majority of votes cast
3Advisory (Non-binding) Vote on Executive Compensation (Say on Pay)FORAffirmative vote of a majority of votes cast

* More fully described in Proposal 1 - Election of Directors, Manner of Voting Proxies

8

Q: What options do I have in voting on each proposal?Our Director Nominees

 

A: Except with respect to Proposal 1 for the election of directors, you may vote “for,” “against,” or “abstain” on each proposal properly brought before the Annual Meeting.  In the election of directors, you may vote “for” or “withhold authority” to vote for each nominee.  

Q: WhatYou are the voting requirements with regard to each proposal?

A: Under our Bylaws, all elections of directors are decided by plurality vote. However, notwithstanding the plurality standard, in an uncontested election for directors, which is the case for the election under Proposal 1, our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that if any director nominee receives a greater number of votes “withheld” from his or her election than votes “for” such election, then the director will promptly tender his or her resignation to the Board following certification of the shareholder vote, with such resignation to be effective upon acceptance by the Board of Directors. The Compensation and Governance Committee would then review and make a recommendation to the Board of Directors as to whether the Board should accept the resignation, and the Board would ultimately decide whether to accept the resignation. The Company will disclose its decision-making process regarding the resignation in a Form 8-K furnished to the SEC. In contested elections, the required vote would be a plurality of votes cast and the resignation policy would not apply. Full details of this policy are set forth in our Corporate Governance Guidelines, available on our website atwww.seacoastbanking.net.

Proposals 2 and 3 require approval by the affirmative vote of a majority of votes cast at the Annual Meeting.

Our Board of Directors unanimously recommends that you vote “FOR” Proposals 1, 2 and 3.

Unless otherwise required by the Company’s Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation, as amended (“Articles of Incorporation”), our Bylaws, the Florida Business Corporation Act, or by applicable law, any other proposal that is properly brought before the Annual Meeting will require approval by the affirmative vote of a majority of all votes cast at the Annual Meeting.

Please remember that Proposals 1 and 3 are each considered non-routine matters. As a result, if your shares are held by a broker or other fiduciary, your shares cannot be voted on these matters unless you have provided voting instructions to your broker or other nominee.

Abstentions and broker non-votes, if any, will not be counted for purposes of determining whether any of the proposals have received sufficient votes for approval, but will count for purposes of determining whether or not a quorum is present.  So long as a quorum is present, abstentions and broker non-votes will have no effect on any of the matters presented for a vote at the Annual Meeting.

Q: What is “householding” and how does it affect me?

A: The SEC permits delivery of one copy of the proxy materials to shareholders who have the same address and last name under a procedure referred to as “householding”. We do not utilize householding for our shareholders of record. However, if you hold your shares through a broker, bank or other nominee, you may receive only one copy of the Notice and, as applicable, any additional proxy materials that are delivered.

If you receive a single set of proxy materials as a result of householding, and you would like to have separate copies of proxy materials mailed to you in the future, please contact your broker, bank or other nominee. However, if you want to receive a paper proxy or Notice or other proxy materials for purposes of this year’s Annual Meeting, follow the instructions included in the Notice that was sent to you, or as indicated above under “What if I prefer to receive paper or email copies of the materials?”

Q: Who will pay the expenses of the proxy solicitation?

A: The Company will bear the cost of preparing, printing and mailing the proxy materials and soliciting proxies for the Annual Meeting. In addition to the solicitation of shareholders of record by mail, telephone, electronic mail, facsimile or personal contact, Seacoast will be contacting brokers, dealers, banks, and/or voting trustees or their nominees who can be identified as record holders of Common Stock; such holders, after inquiry by Seacoast, will provide information concerning quantities of proxy materials needed to supply such information to beneficial owners, and Seacoast will reimburse them for the reasonable expense of mailing proxy materials. Seacoast may retain other unaffiliated third parties to solicit proxies and pay the reasonable expenses and charges of such third parties for their services.

Q: Where do I find the voting results of the Annual Meeting?

A: If available, we will announce voting results at the Annual Meeting. The voting results will also be disclosed on a Form 8-K that we will file with the SEC within four business days after the Annual Meeting.

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Shareholder Meeting to be Held on May 21, 2014.

The Notice of Annual Meeting, the 2014 Proxy Statement and the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 are available at:

www.proxyvote.com

PROPOSAL 1

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

General

As of the date of this proxy statement, Seacoast’s Board of Directors consists of fourteen members divided into three classes, serving staggered three year terms as provided in our Articles of Incorporation.

The Annual Meeting is being heldasked to, among other things, re-electproposals, elect four Class III directors of Seacoast, elect two Class II directors and elect one Class III director, each of whom has been nominated by the Compensation and Governance Committee of the Board of Directors.Seacoast. All of the nominees, except Alvaro Monserrat, are presently directors of Seacoast andSeacoast. All of the nominees also serve as members of the Boardboard of Directorsdirectors of Seacoast’s principal banking subsidiary, Seacoast National Bank (the “Bank”). The membersAlvaro J. Monserrat has been nominated by Seacoast’s Board to replace T. Michael Crook, who intends to retire from the Company’s Board at the end of the Boards of Directors of the Bank and the Company are the same except for John H. Crane, who is currently a director of the Bank only.Annual Meeting. If re-elected,elected, each Class III director nominee will serve a three year term expiring at the 20172020 Annual Meeting and until their successors have been elected and qualified. Detailed information about each nominee’s background, skills and expertise can be found inProposal I – Election of Directors.

 

On September 17, 2013, the Board of Directors, following the recommendation of our Compensation and Governance Committee, elected Dennis J. Arczynski as a director, effective immediately, replacing John H. Crane who retired from the Company’s Board in July 2013. Mr. Arczynski has been a director of the Bank since 2007. Mr. Crane remains on the Board of Directors of the Bank. Mr. Arczynski will stand for election as a Class II director at the Annual Meeting, and, if elected, Mr. Arczynski will serve for a term expiring at the 2016 Annual Meeting, along with the other Class II directors.

NameAgeDirector
Since
Current OccupationIndependentNo. of
Other
Public
Boards
Stephen E. Bohner642003President and owner of real estate companyü0
Alvaro J. Monserrat48newCEO of a leading digital workspace technology companyü0
Julie H. Daum622013Senior director of national executive and board search firmü0
Dennis S. Hudson, III611984Chairman of Company and Bank 2

 

On October 15, 2013, the Board of Directors, following the recommendation of our Compensation and Governance Committee, increased the size of the Board from twelve to thirteen directors and appointed Julie H. Daum as a director to immediately fill the vacancy on the expanded Board. Ms. Daum will stand for election as a Class III director at the Annual Meeting, and, if elected, will serve for a term expiring at the 2017 Annual Meeting, along with the other Class III directors.

On February 24, 2014, the Board of Directors, following the recommendation of our Compensation and Governance Committee, increased the size of the Board from thirteen to fourteen directors and appointed Maryann B. Goebel as a director to immediately fill the vacancy on the expanded Board. Ms. Goebel will stand for election as a Class II director at the Annual Meeting, and, if elected, will serve for a term expiring at the 2016 Annual Meeting, along with the other Class II directors.

Currently, the Board of Directors is classified as follows:

ClassTermNames of Directors
Class ITerm Expires at the 2015 Annual MeetingH. Gilbert Culbreth, Jr.
Christopher E. Fogal
Robert B. Goldstein
Dale M. Hudson
Class IITerm Expires at the 2016 Annual Meeting

Dennis J. Arczynski

Maryann B. Goebel

Roger O. Goldman
Dennis S. Hudson, Jr.
Thomas E. Rossin

Class IIITerm Expires at the 2014 Annual Meeting

Stephen E. Bohner
T. Michael Crook

Julie H. Daum
Dennis S. Hudson, III
Edwin E. Walpole, III

 

8
9 

 

Manner for Voting Proxies

All shares represented by valid proxies, and not revoked before they are exercised, will be voted in the manner specified therein. If a valid proxy is submitted but no vote is specified, the proxy will be votedFOR the election of each of the seven nominees for election as directors. Please note that banks and brokers that do not receive voting instructions from their clients are not able to vote their client’s shares in the election of directors. Although all nominees are expected to serve if elected, if any nominee is unable to serve, then the persons designated as proxies will vote for the remaining nominees and for such replacements, if any, as may be nominated by Seacoast’s Compensation and Governance Committee. Proxies cannot be voted for a greater number of persons than the number of nominees specified herein (seven persons). Cumulative voting is not permitted.

The affirmative vote of the holders of shares of Common Stock representing a plurality of the votes cast at the Annual Meeting at which a quorum is present is required for the election of the directors listed below. However, to provide shareholders with a meaningful role in uncontested director elections, which is the case for the election of the director nominees listed below, our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that if any director nominee receives a greater number of votes “withheld” for his or her election than votes “for” such election, then the director will promptly tender his or her resignation to the Board following certification of the shareholder vote, with such resignation to be effective upon acceptance by the Board of Directors. The Compensation and Governance Committee would then review and make a recommendation to the Board of Directors as to whether the Board should accept the resignation, and the Board would ultimately decide whether to accept the resignation. The Company will disclose its decision-making process regarding the resignation in a Form 8-K furnished to the SEC. In contested elections, the required vote would be a plurality of votes cast and the resignation policy would not apply. Further details of this policy and the corresponding procedures are set forth in our Corporate Governance Guidelines, available on our website at www.seacoastbanking. net.

 

The seven nominees have been nominated by Seacoast's CompensationBoard and Governance Committee, and the Board of Directors unanimously recommends a vote “FOR” the election of all seven nominees listed below.Highlights

 

Nominees to be Elected at the Annual MeetingINFORMATION ABOUT OUR CURRENT BOARD COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP AND 2016 COMMITTEE MEETINGS

 

Dennis J. Arczynski, age 62, is the chairman of the Enterprise Risk Management Committee and has been a director of the Bank since 2007. He was appointed to the Seacoast Board of Directors in September 2013, replacing retired director John H. Crane.

Mr. Arczynski is a risk management, corporate governance, regulatory affairs and banking consultant since 2007. He previously served for 33 years in various managerial and examiner positions in the U. S. Office of the Comptroller of the Currency’s (the “OCC”) headquarters in Washington, D.C. and in several other OCC districts until 2007. As a National Bank Examiner with the OCC, Mr. Arczynski was responsible for the supervision and examination of the largest and most complex mid-size banks, community banks and trust companies; provided guidance to banks in all facets of commercial banking and fiduciary operations including international activities; performed risk assessment and conducted BSA/AML reviews and examinations of internationally active banks; and developed formal enforcement actions and corrective action plans for struggling and deficient institutions.

Mr. Arczynski’s other positions of responsibility with the OCC included Assistant Director for Trust Operations, Special Assistant to the Senior Deputy Comptroller (FFIEC Liaison), Associate Director for Financial Management (Financial and Systems Review) and Field Office Manager (Miami Field Office). His duties included the formation of national policies and programs, development of OCC supervisory initiatives, establishment of interagency relations, drafting regulations and writing OCC examiner handbooks.

In making the determination that Mr. Arczynski should be a nominee for director of Seacoast, the Compensation and Governance Committee considered these qualifications, as well as:

Director NameAuditCompensation &
Governance
Enterprise Risk
Management
Strategy &
Innovation
Dennis J. Arczynski(1)X X(2)X
Stephen Bohner(1)  X 
Jacqueline L. Bradley(1)   X
T. Michael Crook  X 
H. Gilbert Culbreth, Jr.(1) X(2)  
Julie H. Daum(1) X  
Christopher E. Fogal(1)X(2)   
Maryann Goebel(1)XXX 
Roger O. Goldman(1) (3)    
Dennis S. Hudson, Jr.  X 
Dennis S. Hudson, III(4)   X
Timothy S. Huval(1)   X
Herbert A. Lurie   X
Alvaro J. Monserrat   X
Thomas E. Rossin(1)  XX(2)
TOTAL MEETINGS HELD9857

 

·(1)his knowledge of the most effective management practices of the largest and most complex mid-size banks;

·his expertise in all facets of commercial banking and fiduciary operations, including risk assessment and BSA/AML;

·his risk management, corporate governance, and regulatory background specific to the financial services industry; and

·his public service which provides the Board of Directors with an alternative perspective in the areas of government relations and regulatory matters that impact the Company.

Stephen E. Bohner, age 60, is a member of the Company’s Compensation and Governance Committee and has been a director of Seacoast since 2003.

Mr. Bohner has been president and owner of Premier Realty Group, a real estate company located in Sewalls Point, Florida, specializing in the sale of luxury homes, since 1987. In addition to his 37 years of experience in real estate, Mr. Bohner is actively involved in several professional and community organizations, having served as president of the Greater Martin County Association of Realtors and The Pine School. He was awarded the Realtor Association’s Distinguished Service Award in 2001, and has served on numerous professional standards’ panels in arbitration hearings and chaired the Realtors Association’s grievance committee. Mr. Bohner is a graduate of Vanderbilt University with dual degrees in Business and Economics.

In making the determination that Mr. Bohner should be a nominee for director of Seacoast, the Compensation and Governance Committee considered these qualifications and his qualification as an independent director, as well as:

·his business leadership and expertise in real estate, which provides the Board of Directors with valuable insight related to local real estate markets in which the Bank’s customers are located and helps the Board make critical judgments regarding the Bank’s lending activities since such judgments rely upon the proper valuation of real estate;

·his business leadership and entrepreneurial and management skills developed over the past 37 years;

·his stature in the local community garnered from his years of professional and community involvement; and

·his experience with the Company.

10

T. Michael Crook, age 66, is a member of the Company’s Audit Committee and the Enterprise Risk Management Committee, and has been a director of Seacoast since 2003.

Mr. Crook has been a principal with the public accounting firm of Proctor, Crook, Crowder & Fogal, P.A., located in Stuart, Florida, since 1976 and a CPA certified public accountant (“CPA”) since 1975. He was a member of Barnett Bank’s Martin County board of directors for 11 years from 1986 to 1997. Mr. Crook is also active in the community, currently serving as a member of the board of the Martin County Community Foundation, and previously serving as director and president of the Economic Council and Stuart Kiwanis Club, former director of the Arts Foundation of Martin County and Stuart/Martin County Chamber of Commerce, and past chairman of the Indian River Community College Accounting Advisory Committee.

Mr. Crook’s professional affiliations include the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, the Management Advisory Services Division of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, and the local legislative contact for the Florida Institute of Certified Public Accountants.

In making the determination that Mr. Crook should be a nominee for director of Seacoast, the Compensation and Governance Committee considered these qualifications and his qualification as an independent director, as well as:

·his business experience and sound business judgment;

·his accounting expertise as a CPA for more than 38 years, and his ability to provide guidance to the Board of Directors regarding accounting and financial matters;

·his stature in the local community, including through service on the boards of the community organizations discussed above; and

·his experience with the Company.

Julie H. Daum, age 59, is a member of the Compensation and Governance Committee and was elected as a director of the Bank and Seacoast in October 2013.

Ms. Daum has been a senior director of Spencer Stuart, a privately-held global executive search firm, since 1993. As co-head of the North American Board and CEO Practice at Spencer Stuart, she has helped place over 1,000 directors on corporate boards, including the boards of Coach, Delta Air Lines, American Express, CVS Caremark, General Motors and Amazon. Prior to her work at Spencer Stuart, Ms. Daum was the executive director of the corporate board resource at Catalyst, where she managed all board of directors’ activities and worked with companies to identify qualified women for their boards.

A widely renowned expert on corporate governance topics, Ms. Daum was recognized by the National Association of Corporate Directors’ (“NACD”) as one of the top 100 most influential leaders in corporate governance in 2013. She also advises corporate boards on succession planning for themselves and their CEOs, as well as best practices and governance issues. Each year, Ms. Daum develops the Spencer Stuart Board Index, a publication detailing trends at national boardrooms. She also co-founded and developed a program for board members entitled “Fresh Insights and Best Practices for Directors” at the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania, where she earned her MBA.

In making the determination that Ms. Daum should be a nominee for director of Seacoast, the Compensation and Governance Committee considered these qualifications and her qualification as an independent director, as well as:

·her expertise in recruiting, human resources and corporate governance;

·her associations in the Florida market and insights and perspectives on public, private and not-for-profit boards;

·her stature in the corporate governance community garnered from her years of professional involvement; and

·her ability to serve as a mentor and catalyst to bring more women into senior leadership positions with the Company.

Maryann B. Goebel, age 62, is a member of the Company’s Audit Committee and Enterprise Risk Management Committee, and was elected as a director of the Bank and Seacoast in February 2014.

Ms. Goebel has been an independent IT management consultant since mid-2012. In July 2012, she retired from Fiserv, Inc. (NASDAQ: FISV) where she had served as executive vice president and chief information officer since June 2009. In this role, she was responsible for all internal Fiserv IT systems (infrastructure and applications), as well as IT infrastructure, operations, engineering and middleware services for Fiserv clients who chose to outsource the processing of their Fiserv applications.

In her 40+ year career, Ms. Goebel has shaped the strategic direction of information technology for major corporations around the world, serving in the critical role of chief information officer for: DHL Express from 2006 to 2009; General Motors North America from 2003 to 2006; General Motors Europe from 1999 to 2001; General Motors Truck Group from 1997 to 1999; Bell Atlantic NYNEX Mobile (now Verizon Mobile) from 1995 to 1997; and Frito-Lay from 2001 to 2002. She has also held senior IT leadership positions at Texas Instruments, Inc., Aérospatiale Helicopter Corporation, and the Southland Corporation, among others. Ms. Goebel received the “100 Leading Women in the North American Auto Industry” award in 2005. She has also been given an award for outstanding professional achievement from her alma mater, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, where she earned a Bachelor of Science degree in mathematics.

In making the determination that Ms. Goebel should be a nominee for director of Seacoast, the Compensation and Governance Committee considered these qualifications and her qualification as an independent director, as well as:

·her knowledge of complex information technology environments and focus on innovation;

·her expertise in strategizing and implementing best-practice processes, tools and structure that are essential to supporting a superior customer experience;

·her extensive experience in aligning IT objectives with corporate priorities; and

·her leadership and ability to help transform Seacoast into an organization that uses technology to deliver state-of-the-art customer services.Independent Director
(2)

Dennis S. Hudson, III, age 58, serves as Chairman and has been a director of Seacoast since 1984.

Mr. Hudson was named Chairman of Seacoast in July 2005, and has served as Chief Executive Officer of the Company since June 1998. Mr. Hudson has also served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Bank since 1992. He served as President of Seacoast from June 1998 to July 2005, after serving in various positions with the Company and the Bank since 1978. Mr. Hudson also serves on the board of directors and the audit committee of Chesapeake Utilities Corporation (ticker: CPK), a public gas and electric utilities company headquartered in Dover, Delaware, which merged with Florida Public Utilities Company (“FPU”) in 2009. Prior to that time, he served as a member of the board of directors of FPU. He was also a member of the board of directors of the Miami Branch of the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta from 2005 through 2010.

Committee Chair

Mr. Hudson is actively involved in the community, having served on the boards of the Martin County YMCA Foundation, Council on Aging, The Pine School, the Job Training Center, American Heart Association, Martin County United Way, the Historical Society of Martin County and as chairman of the board of the Economic Council of Martin County, on which he still serves. He has been recognized for his achievements with several awards including the Florida Senate Medallion of Excellence Award presented by Florida Senator Ken Pruitt in 2001. Mr. Hudson is a graduate of Florida State University with dual degrees in Finance and Accounting, and a Master’s degree in Business Administration.

In making the determination that Mr. Hudson should be a nominee for director of Seacoast, the Compensation and Governance Committee considered these qualifications, as well as:

·(3)his significant experience in the financial services industry and the organization, including his service as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, which provides a unique understanding of our operations;

·his knowledge and relationships with the institutional investor community, including the Company’s past and present institutional investors;

·his service on other public company boards, which provides insight regarding general public company operations, policies, internal controls and corporate governance, which is useful and applicable to Seacoast; and

·his stature in the local community, including through service on the boards of the non-profit organizations discussed above.

Edwin E. Walpole, age 78, is a member of the Company’s Compensation and Governance Committee and has been a director of Seacoast since 2006.

Mr. Walpole has been the president, owner and director of Walpole Inc., a trucking transportation company in Okeechobee, Florida which covers the Southeastern United States, since 1960. He served as chairman, president and chief executive officer of Big Lake Financial Corporation (“Big Lake”) from 1985 until Big Lake was acquired by Seacoast in April 2006. Mr. Walpole is also the president of Seminole Land Company, Walpole Feed and Supply Company, Trading Post & Farmers Market, and Fort Drum Corporation, and vice president and director of Walpole Leasing Corporation. He is a member and past president of the Okeechobee Economic Council and of the Florida Trucking Association, a member of the American Trucking Association, and formerly served on the board of trustees of Murray State University where he earned a Bachelor of Science degree in Agriculture.

13

In making the determination that Mr. Walpole should be a nominee for director of Seacoast, the Compensation and Governance Committee considered these qualifications and his qualification as an independent director, as well as:

·his business leadership, entrepreneurial and management skills, developed through his leadership of Big Lake for more than 20 years and as the president and owner of Walpole Inc. for more than 50 years;

·his stature in the local community, including through service in the leadership positions set forth above; and

·his experience with the Company.

Directors Whose Terms Extend Beyond the Annual Meeting

H. Gilbert Culbreth, Jr., age 68, is co-chairman of the Company’s Compensation and Governance Committee, was a member of the Audit Committee in 2013 and has been a director of Seacoast since 2008.

Mr. Culbreth has been chief executive officer and owner of Gilbert Chevrolet Company, Inc., a car dealership located in Okeechobee, Florida, for over 40 years. He also owns and manages Gilbert Ford, another car dealership in Okeechobee, Florida. Mr. Culbreth was previously a member of Big Lake’s Financial Corporation’s (“Big Lake”) board of directors for 10 years prior to the acquisition of Big Lake by Seacoast in April 2006, and has served on the Bank’s board of directors since the acquisition. In addition, Mr. Culbreth is president of several other family businesses, including, Culbreth Realty, Inc. (a real estate brokerage company), Parrott Investments, Inc. (a holding company for two other businesses), Gilbert Cattle Co., LLC (a cattle operation), Gilbert Marine (a watercraft sales company) and Gilbert Aviation Inc. (an aircraft sales and service company).

Mr. Culbreth is a former director of the Florida Council on Economic Education, the Okeechobee County Board of Realtors, the Okeechobee Economic Council, and the United Way of Okeechobee and is a member of the Masonic Lodge.

In making the determination that Mr. Culbreth should remain a director of Seacoast, the Compensation and Governance Committee considered these qualifications and his qualification as an independent director, as well as:

·his diversity of business experience for 40 years in the Okeechobee, Florida market, which is valuable in understanding the customer segments in this market;

·his entrepreneurial and management skills;

·his stature in and knowledge of the local community; and

·his experience with the Company.

14

Christopher E. Fogal, age 62, is chairman of the Company’s Audit Committee, was a member of the Company’s Compensation and Governance Committee in 2013 and has been a director of Seacoast since 1997.

Mr. Fogal is a certified public accountant and principal with the public accounting firm of Proctor, Crook, Crowder & Fogal, P.A. He was the managing partner of Fogal & Associates from 1979 until the firm merged with Proctor Crook in 2009. Mr. Fogal served on the board of directors of Port St. Lucie National Bank until it was acquired by Seacoast in 1996. He has also served as past chairman of the Treasure Coast Private Industry Council and past president of the St. Lucie County Chamber of Commerce, and is active in a number of professional organizations including the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and the Florida Institute of Certified Public Accountants.

In making the determination that Mr. Fogal should remain a director of Seacoast, the Compensation and Governance Committee considered these qualifications and his qualification as an independent director, as well as:

·his accounting expertise as a CPA, which provides the Board of Directors with guidance related to internal controls and financial and accounting matters;

·his business, management and decision-making skills, including his experience as managing partner of an accounting firm for 30 years;

·his stature in the local community; and

·his experience with the Company.

Roger O. Goldman, age 69, has been the Board’sIndependent Lead Independent Director since November 2012 and a director of Seacoast since February 2012. Mr. Goldman alsowho serves as an ex-officio (non-voting) member of all committees.

Mr. Goldman has been a directorcommittees

(4)Chairman of American Express Bank FSB, a federally chartered savings bank located in Salt Lake City, Utah (“AEBFSB”) since 2005, and is chairman of their audit and risk committee.1 He also serves on their compliance committee and executive committee. Mr. Goldman is also President and managing partner of Berkshire Opportunity Fund, which he founded in 2008 to provide financing and mentoring for small businesses in the Northeast. From 2009 to 2010, Mr. Goldman served as temporary volunteer CEO for 1Berkshire to create a powerful economic development engine for the Berkshires by integrating the work of four primary economic development agencies and raising larger and more sustainable funding.

Board

 

From 1997Director Attendance:All directors attended over 75% or more of the meetings of the Board andBoard committees on which they served in 2016.

10

Board Composition

Over the past four years, we have continually recruited new talent to 2000, Mr. Goldman was presidentour Board to increase diversity of thought and chief executive officerexperience and to better align overall Board capability with our strategic focus. During this time, our Chairman/CEO and our Lead Independent Director have focused considerable attention on Board refreshment and we have added six new directors (seven should Alvaro Monserrat be elected at the Annual Meeting) with skill sets needed to help navigate the fast-changing environment impacting our business. As a result, our overall Board composition has been significantly altered across a number of Global Sourcing Services, LLC,important aspects creating a start-up venture specializingvibrant Board culture and unrelenting focus on creating shareholder value over the long term.

Below is a graphic illustration of the changes in outsourced marketing services and account acquisition and customer retention programs, which he grew to a substantial size before it was sold.our Board over the past four years:

Seacoast Board of Directors

11

Currently, our board has the following characteristics:

 

 

1 AEBFSB has entered into various consent orders with each of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau regarding certain compliance related matters that AEBFSB should resolve. AEBFSB also paid certain civil money penalties, established a segregated fund to provide remediation to certain customers and agreed to make certain enhancements to its compliance and vendor oversight programs.

Mr. Goldman’s extensive banking experience also includes management positions at Citicorp from 1969 to 1983; service as president and chief executive officer of Redwood Bank, a community bank in San Francisco, California, from 1983 to 1986; executive vice president and senior operating officer of Coreast Savings Bank from 1989 to 1991; and executive vice president in charge of the community banking group of NatWest Bancorp (with $31 billion in assets) from 1991 to 1996 where he was responsible for managing all consumer and small business activities. In addition, he previously served on the boards of several public and private corporations, including Minyanville (a new media company), Cyota (an Internet security company), and American Express Centurion Bank, where he also served as a member of the audit committee. He is Chairman Emeritus of the Lighthouse International, a charitable foundation for the visually impaired which is headquartered in New York, and is the former Chairman of the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation. Mr. Goldman received his Bachelor’s degree from New York University in Marketing and his Juris Doctorate from the Washington College of Law at American University. He is an emeritus member of the New Jersey bar and former member of the Washington D.C. bar.

 

In making

Since 2013, we have managed the determination that Mr. Goldman should remain a director of Seacoast, the Compensation and Governance Committee considered these qualifications and his qualification as an independent director, as well as:

Board talent pipeline and:

·his diversity of leadership experience in the financial services industry, particularly with respectadded three women to his retail banking and consumer and small business lending background;

·his marketing and risk management expertise;

·his legal background and knowledge of corporate governance matters;

·his knowledge of and associations in the Palm Beach County market; and

·his considerable insights and perspectives garnered from years of service on public, private and not-for-profit boards.

Robert B. Goldstein, age 73, is co-chairman of the Company’s Compensation and Governance Committee, is a member of the Enterprise Risk Management Committee and has been a director of Seacoast since 2010.

Mr. Goldstein is a founding principal of CapGen Capital Advisors LLC (“CapGen LLC”), New York, New York, an investment program fund formed in 2007 that invests in banks and financial institutions. He is also a member of CapGen LLC’s investment committee. As of March 20, 2014, an affiliate of CapGen LLC was the beneficial owner of 5,470,090 shares of the Company’s common stock, representing 21.1 percent of outstanding shares.

Mr. Goldstein is also currently a director of FNB Corporation (since 2003), a member of their executive committee and chairman of their compensation committee; is a director of Hampton Roads Bankshares (since 2010) and a member of their compensation, governance/nominating, and risk oversight committees; and is lead director of Palmetto Bancshares, Inc. and a member of the board of its banking subsidiary, Palmetto Bank (since 2010) and member of their credit and governance/nominating committees. Mr. Goldstein is also chairman of the board of directors of THE BANKshares, Inc., a member of the audit, ALCO, compensation and executive committees of THE BANKshares, Inc., and a director of its banking subsidiary, BankFIRST, since 2007. Mr. Goldstein’s other senior executive and director experience includes service as director and chairman of the executive committee of Great Lakes Bancorp from 2005 to 2006; chairman of the board and chief executive officer of Bay View Capital Corporation, a $6 billion bank holding company, from 2001 to 2006; director of Cobalt Holdings, LLC (an accredited credit rating agency and asset management company) from 2003 to 2010, as well as numerous other executive and/or director positions with financial institutions over a career that has spanned 50 years. Mr. Goldstein is nationally recognized for his expert investing and operational experience in turning around and implementing growth strategies for banks under the most challenging circumstances.

Mr. Goldstein’s appointment to the Board of Directors is pursuant to the Stock Purchase Agreement (the “Stock Purchase Agreement”), dated October 23, 2009, between Seacoast and CapGen Capital Group III LP (“CapGen LP”), an affiliate of CapGen LLC. CapGen LP purchased 6,000,000 shares of our Common Stock on December 17, 2009 for $13.5 million pursuant to the Stock Purchase Agreement. Under the Stock Purchase Agreement, CapGen LP is entitled to appoint one director to our Board of Directors as long as CapGen LP or an affiliate retains ownership of the shares purchased under the agreement.

Although Mr. Goldstein’s directorships on outside boards exceed the number specified in the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, the Compensation and Governance Committee currently believes that the number of directorships is acceptable since Mr. Goldstein’s full-time job is to represent and provide expertise to boards of the banks in which CapGen LLC and its affiliates invest, and his directorships on these boards were approved by the Federal Reserve.

In making the determination that Mr. Goldstein should remain a director of Seacoast, the Compensation and Governance Committee considered these qualifications and his qualification as an independent director, as well as:

·his significant experience in the financial services industry;

·his leadership and service on other public company boards, which provides insight regarding general public company operations, policies, internal controls and corporate governance, which is useful and applicable to Seacoast; and

·his knowledge and perspective on the interests of the institutional investor community.

Dale M. Hudson, age 79, has been a director of Seacoast since 1983.

Mr. Hudson served as Vice Chairman of Seacoast from July 2005 until his retirement on December 31, 2010, having previously served as Chairman from June 1998 to July 2005. He served as Chief Executive Officer of Seacoast from 1992 to June 1998, as President of Seacoast from 1990 to June 1998, and as Chairman of the Board of the Bank from September 1992 to June 1998. He also served on the board of directors of the Florida Bankers Association for five years. In addition to his 55+ years in banking, Mr. Hudson is extremely active in the community and charitable organizations. He has served on the Martin Memorial Hospital Foundation and Community Boards, as well as on the boards of the American Cancer Society, Honorary Advisory Board of the Florida Oceanographic Society, Indian River Community College, Treasure Coast Blood Bank Advisory Board and The Pine School for 15 years, including two years as chairman.

Mr. Hudson has also devoted 19 years of service as chairman of Mary’s Kitchen, a local soup kitchen for the homeless. He has received numerous awards and honorary titles, including the first Martin County Citizen of the Year Award by the March of Dimes in 1995 and the National Philanthropy Award with his wife in 2006.

In making the determination that Mr. Hudson should remain a director of Seacoast, the Compensation and Governance Committee considered these qualifications, as well as:

·his significant experience in the financial services industry and the organization, including his prior service as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, which provides a unique understanding of our operations;

·his tenure as director that spans a full range of banking and economic cycles affecting the Company; and

·his stature in the local community, including through the leadership positions with the community organizations and philanthropic work discussed above.

Dennis S. Hudson, Jr., age 86, is a member of the Enterprise Risk Management Committee and has been a director of Seacoast since 1983.

Mr. Hudson retired in June 1998 after a 48-year career with the Company and Bank. He served as Chairman of the Board of Seacoast from 1990 to June 1998. Prior thereto, he served as Chief Executive Officer of Seacoast from 1983 until 1992, President of Seacoast from 1983 until 1990 and Chairman of the Bank from 1969 until 1992. Mr. Hudson also served on the board of the Miami Branch of the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta from 1983 to 1985. Active in the community and with charitable organizations, he has served as chairman of the American Red Cross of Martin County, president of the Stuart Rotary, and as a director of Hospice of Martin County.

In making the determination that Mr. Hudson should remain a director of Seacoast, the Compensation and Governance Committee considered these qualifications, as well as:

·his significant experience in the financial services industry and the organization, including his prior service as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, which provides a unique understanding of our operations;

·his tenure as director that spans a full range of banking and economic cycles affecting the Company; and

·his stature in the local community, including the leadership positions with the community organizations discussed above.

Thomas E. Rossin, age 80, is a member of the Enterprise Risk Management Committee, was a member of the Compensation and Governance Committee in 2013 and has been a director of Seacoast since 2004.

Mr. Rossin has been a practicing attorney in West Palm Beach, Florida, since 1993, currently serving as management chairman with the firm of St. John, Rossin, Podesta, Burr & Lemme, PLLC. He served as a Florida State Senator from 1994 to 2002, the last two years as minority leader, and was a candidate for Florida Lt. Governor in 2002. He founded Flagler National Bank in 1974, serving as president, chief executive officer and director and growing it to the largest independent bank in Palm Beach County with over $1 billion in assets. Forming The Flagler Bank Corporation, the holding company for Flagler National Bank, in 1983 and serving as president, chief executive officer and director, he took it public in 1984 and facilitated the acquisition of three financial institutions, until both Flagler National Bank and the holding company were sold in 1993 to SunTrust Bank.

Prior thereto, Mr. Rossin was vice chairman and director of First Bancshares of Florida, Inc. after consolidating four banks under one charter, including First National Bank in Riviera Beach at which he served as president and chief executive officer. He has served as past president of the Community Bankers Association of Florida and Palm Beach County Bankers Association, and is a member of the Palm Beach County Bar Association, American Bar Association and the Florida Bar Association. In March 2014, Mr. Rossin received the Exemplary Elected Official Award from the Forum Club of the Palm Beaches.

In making the determination that Mr. Rossin should remain a director of Seacoast, the Compensation and Governance Committee considered these qualifications and his qualification as an independent director, as well as:

·his legal background and, in particular, his knowledge of legal issues related to financial institutions and underlying corporate governance matters;Board;
·his public service which, combined with his legal background, provides the Board of Directors with knowledgeadded expertise in the areas of government relations and regulatory matters, that impact the Company;risk management, talent acquisition, corporate governance, credit management, strategic planning, investment banking and technology; and

·his significant experience in the financial services industry; and

·his experience with the Company.transitioned four retiring long-tenured directors.

 

Non-Director Executive OfficersShould Alvaro Monserrat be elected at the Annual Meeting, we will have reduced the average tenure of our non-executive directors from 13.7 years to 9.5 years and decreased the average age by nearly 6.8 years.

12

Our Board is committed to identifying, appointing and developing directors who reflect the diverse profiles of our existing and prospective customers, have experience and expertise aligned with our strategic objectives, and who can add significant value to the Board’s efforts to oversee Seacoast on behalf of our shareholders. Constructing an effective Board and positioning it for success are key objectives for Seacoast. Under our Independent Lead Director Goldman’s guidance, we have made significant progress in expanding the experience of the Board. These outcomes have increased overall Board effectiveness while increasing its agility and the velocity of decision making, which are critical inputs in the governance process. Under Mr. Goldman’s leadership, the Board is well-positioned to fulfill its duties to our shareholders and meet the evolving needs of Seacoast.

13

 

Maria G. FriasOur Corporate Governance Framework, age 52, has served as Executive Vice President and Chief Risk Officer of Seacoast since April 2012.  Ms. Frias served as the Bank’s Senior Vice President and Chief Auditor from July 2003 to April 2012 and as Compliance Officer from April 1996 to April 2012.  She held various positions in the Company’s Internal Audit Department since October 1990.  Ms. Frias holds a B.S. in Finance and a Master’s degree in Business Administration from the City University of New York.  She maintains a number of professional designations, including: Certification in Risk Management Assurance, Certified Risk Professional, Certified Internal Auditor, Certified Bank Auditor, Certified Financial Services Auditor, Certified Regulatory Compliance Manager and FINRA Series 7.  Ms. Frias is actively involved with the South Florida Compliance Association, National Association of Chartered Bank Auditors and the Palm Beach Chapter of the Institute of Internal Auditors, where she has served on the Board of Governors since October 2000.

William R. Hahl, age 65, has served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Seacoast and the Bank since July 1990.  Previously, he worked for Ernst and Young for 13 years, before leaving to start his own consulting firm. Mr. Hahl is a graduate of Kent State University, a CPA and member of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, Florida Institute of Certified Public Accountants and the Ohio Society of Certified Public Accountants.

David D. Houdeshell, age 53, has served as Executive Vice President and Chief Credit Officer of Seacoast and the Bank since June 2010.  Before joining the Company, Mr. Houdeshell served from April 2007 to May 2010 as executive vice president and credit administrative executive for The South Financial Group in Greenville, South Carolina, a $12 billion commercial bank holding company. In this role, he had oversight and direction of credit administration, policy and procedure development, credit monitoring, loan review, credit processes and technology initiatives.  From October 2005 to March 2007, Mr. Houdeshell was senior vice president and director of credit portfolio risk management at The South Financial Group.  Prior thereto, he was chief credit officer of Bombardier Capital, a $13 billion financial services entity of a global transportation manufacturer, for five years. Mr. Houdeshell holds a B.S. in Finance from Florida State University and a Master’s degree in Business Administration from Stonier Graduate School of Banking, University of Delaware.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Corporate Governance Framework

 

Board Independence

·    10Assuming the election of director nominee Monserrat, 11 of our 14 directors arewill be independent.

·    Our CEO is the only member of management who serves as a director.

Board CompositionRefreshment & Diversity

·    Directors regularly reviewWe seek a board that, considered as a group, will possess a diversity of experience, which may, at any one or more times, include differences with respect to personal, educational or professional experience, gender, ethnicity, national origin, geographic representation, community involvement and age.

·    We have a mix of new and longer tenured directors to help ensure fresh perspectives as well as continuity and experience. The average tenure of our non-management directors is 9.5 years.

·    In the event that director nominee Monserrat is elected to the Board, performance; assess gaps in skills and experience; look forwe have added 8 new directors to provide a fresh prospective and ensure sufficient succession planning while maintaining continuity.our Board since 2012, including three women.

Board Committees

·    We have threefour standing boardBoard committees—Audit; Compensation and Governance; andGovernance (“CGC”); Enterprise Risk Management.Management (“ERMC”); and Strategy and Innovation (“S&I”).

·    The Audit Committee and the Compensation and Governance CommitteeCGC consist entirely of independent, non-management directors.

·    Chairs of the committees shape the agenda and information presented to their committees.

Strong Independent Lead Director

·    Our independent directors elect an independent lead director.

·    Our independent lead director chairs regularly scheduled executive sessions, without management present, at which directors can discuss management performance, succession planning, board informationinformational needs, board effectiveness or any other matter.

·    Our lead independent director strongly influences our strategy and direction, and facilitates our annual strategic planning sessions.

Board Oversight of Strategy & Risk

·    Our Board maintains thehas ultimate oversight responsibility for strategy and risk management.

·    Our Board directly advises management on development and execution of the company’s strategy and provides oversight through regular updates.

·    The S&I Committee helps ensure that the strategic vision for the Company is fulfilled by challenging, proposing, reviewing, and monitoring strategic initiatives of the Company relating to M&A activity, capital allocation and planning, business model transformation, innovation, and shareholder relations.

·    Through an integrated enterprise risk management process, key risks are reviewed and evaluated by the Enterprise Risk Management Committee (“ERMC”)ERMC before they are reviewed by the Board.

·    The ERMC oversees the integration of risk management at Seacoast, monitors the risk framework and makes recommendations to the Board regarding the Company’s risk appetite.

·    The Audit Committee oversees the Company’s financial risk management process.

·    The Compensation and Governance CommitteeCGC oversees risks and exposures related to the Company’s corporate governance, director succession planning, and compensation practices to ensure that they do not encourage imprudent or excessive risk-taking.

·    The Compensation and Governance CommitteeCGC assists the Board with its leadership assessment and succession planning with respect to the position of CEO.

·   Our Board directly oversees and advises management on development and execution of the Company’s strategy.CEO succession.

Accountability

·    We have a plurality vote standard for the election of directors, with a director resignation policy for uncontested elections.

·    Each common share is entitled to one vote.

·    AllWe have a process by which all shareholders are able to raise concerns tomay communicate with our Board, a boardBoard committee or non-management directors as a group, or other individual directors.

Director Stock Ownership·     A personalminimum stock holding of fivethree times theirthe annual base retainer is recommendedrequired for each director.director, to be acquired within four years of joining the Board.
Succession Planning·    CEO and management succession planning is one of the Board’s highest priorities. Our Board ensures that appropriate attention is given to identifying and developing talented leaders.
Board Effectiveness

·    Our Board strives to continually improve its effectiveness.

·    The Board meets in a director-only session prior to each regular meeting to discuss the Company’s business condition. Each regular meeting is followed by an executive session of non- management directors led by the lead independent director.

·    The Board and its independent committees annually evaluate their performance.

Open Communication

·    Our Board promotes open and frank discussions with senior management and shareholders.receives regular updates from business leaders regarding their area of expertise.

·    Our directors have access to all management and employees on a confidential basis.

·    Our Board and its committees are authorized to hire outside consultants at their discretion and at the Company’s expense.

14

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AT SEACOAST

Our goal is to maintain a corporate governance framework that supports an engaged, independent board with diverse perspectives and judgment that is committed to representing the long-term interests of our shareholders. We believe our directors should possess the highest personal and professional standards for ethics, integrity and values, as well as practical wisdom and mature judgment. Therefore, our Board, with the assistance of management and the CGC, regularly reviews our corporate governance principles and practices.

Corporate Governance Principles and Practices

Governance Policies

Important elements of our corporate governance framework are our governance policies, which include:

·our Corporate Governance Guidelines
·our Code of Conduct (applicable to all directors, officers and employees)
·our Code of Ethics for Financial Professionals (applicable to, among others, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer); and
·charters for each of our Board Committees

You may view these and other corporate governance documents at our investor relations website located at www.SeacoastBanking.com, or request a copy, without charge, upon written request to Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida, c/o Corporate Secretary, 815 Colorado Avenue, P. O. Box 9012, Stuart, Florida 34995.

Board Independence

Our governance principles provide that a substantial majority of our directors will meet the criteria for independence required by Nasdaq. If director nominee Monserrat is elected by our shareholders at the Annual Meeting, over 78% of our Board will meet our criteria for independence.

 

The Company’s Common Stockcommon stock is listed on the Nasdaq Global Select Market (“Nasdaq”). Nasdaq requires that a majority of the Company’s directors be “independent,” as defined by the Nasdaq’sNasdaq rules. Generally, a director does not qualify as an independent director if the director (or, in some cases, a member of the director’s immediate family) has, or in the past three years had, certain relationships or affiliations with the Company, its external or internal auditors, or other companies that do business with the Company. The Board of Directors has determined that a majority of the Company’s directors are independent directors under the Nasdaq rules. The Company’s current independent directors are: Dennis J. Arczynski, Stephen E. Bohner, T. Michael Crook,Jacqueline L. Bradley, H. Gilbert Culbreth, Jr., Julie H. Daum, Christopher E. Fogal, Maryann Goebel, Roger O. Goldman, Robert B. Goldstein,Timothy S. Huval and Thomas E. Rossin, and Edwin E. Walpole, III.Rossin.

 

15

Board Leadership Structure

Board leadership is provided through: 1) a combined Chairman and CEO role, 2) a clearly defined and substantial lead independent director role, 3) active committees and committee chairs, and 4) talented directors who are committed and independent-minded. At this time, the Board believes this governance structure is appropriate and best serves the interests of our shareholders.

Chairman and CEO Roles

 

The Chairman of the Board of Directors provides leadership to the Board of Directors and works with the Board of Directors to define its structure and activities in the fulfillment of its responsibilities. The Company believes that the members of the Board of Directors possess considerable experience and unique knowledge of the challenges and opportunities the Company faces, and therefore are in the best position to evaluate the needs of the Company and how to best organize the capabilities of the Company’s directors and executives to meet those needs. As a result, the Company believes that the decision as toperiodically assesses who should serve as Chairman and as Chief Executive Officer, and whether the offices should be combined or separate, is properly the responsibility of the Board of Directors, to be exercised from time to time inwith appropriate consideration of then-existingcurrent facts and circumstances.

 

The Company’s current Chief Executive Officer, Dennis S. Hudson, III, also serves as the Chairman of the Board of Directors. He has held the post of Chief Executive Officer for the past 1619 years, Chairman for the past nine12 years, President for the eightnine years prior to being named Chairman, and has also served as Chief Executive Officer of the Bank for the past 2124 years. During this time, Mr. Hudson has led the Company through its growth from a local community bank to an institutionthe fourth largest Florida bank with $2.3nearly $4.7 billion in assets and 3449 full-service branches and five Accelerate business officescommercial banking centers in 12 counties.15 counties today. In light of Mr. Hudson’s significant leadership tenure with the organization, his breadth of knowledge of the Company and his relationship with the institutional investor community, as well as the efficiencies, accountability, unified leadership and cohesive corporate culture that this structure provides, the Board of Directors believes it is appropriate that he serve as both Chief Executive Officer and Chairman.

Independent Lead Director

 

To further strengthen our corporate governance environment, our independent directors select a lead director from the independent directors if the positions of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer are held by the same person or if the Chairman of the Board is not an independent director. The lead director: coordinates the activitiesrole of the independent directors; collaborates with and makes recommendations to the CEO in setting Board meeting agendas; serves as an ex-officio member of each committee of the Board if not otherwise a member of the committee; reviews responses to director shareholder communications with the Board and if requested by a major shareholder or the CEO,our Lead Independent Director is available for consultation or direct communication; prepares the agenda for executive sessions of the independent directors and chairs those sessions; and is primarily responsible for communications between the independent directors and the CEO. A more complete description of the lead director’s role is containeddescribed in our Corporate Governance Guidelines and availablein the table at the end of this section.

Our current Lead Independent Director is Mr. Roger Goldman. He has served in this capacity since 2012. Mr. Goldman’s experience includes a number of high profile leadership assignments at or on behalf of shareholders or other constituent groups at organizations significantly larger than Seacoast. The depth and breadth of his experience and his willingness and capacity to dedicate a significant portion of his time on behalf of the Company’s website at www.seacoastbanking.net. Roger O. Goldman was selected as Lead DirectorBoard and our shareholders are key inputs in November 2012.our transformative efforts. We aspire to be a significantly larger organization. Our ability to attain our aspirations depends heavily on our success in developing and implementing innovative products and services that are easily accessible, secure, and that make a meaningful difference to our customers. His vision for our future and his “operator” level understanding of the required strategies, investments, talent needs, capabilities, infrastructure and the associated risks provide our Board with an independent and objective perspective on our management.

21
 16

Executive SessionsMr. Goldman’s affiliation with Seacoast enhances our reputation within the industry, improves the performance and effectiveness of the Board, and enhances our exposure with the investment community. He is uniquely suited to lead the Board during the normal course of business and in its day-to-day interactions with and oversight of management.

 

In addition to Mr. Goldman’s efforts to ensure an effective and results-oriented Board, he engages on the Board’s behalf with management and employees across the Company. Frequent active, independent, and effective engagement by Mr. Goldman aids our Board of Directors in making informed decisions on our business and risk strategies. He also is well-positioned to assess our executive and managerial talent, succession readiness plans, and leadership development efforts, which are key to our success. Finally, his accessibility and high level of visibility within the Company provides employees with ongoing opportunities to raise issues or concerns free from management’s direct influence. Mr. Goldman provides a wide array of highly valuable services to Seacoast. We believe the associated replacement costs if he were to step down from the Lead Independent Director role are significantly greater than the costs that we would incur to engage a replacement to replicate the services he provides to the Board and our shareholders.

Mr. Goldman devotes significant time to serving as our Lead Independent Director. While the structure of his role and scope of responsibilities are significantly greater than most other US companies, we view his contributions and level of commitment as material to the Company’s success. In order to induce Mr. Goldman to accept the role of Lead Independent Director and ensure that he is paid appropriately for his contributions and time, the Board of Directors approved a compensation package that is discussed below in the “Director Compensation” section under “Lead Independent Director Compensation and Agreement.”

17

BOARD LEADERSHIP STRUCTURE - DEFINITION OF ROLES

Lead Independent Director RoleChair/CEO Role
Full Board Meetings

·    Participates in Board meetings

·    Acts as Chairperson of the Board in situations where the Chairperson/ CEO is unable to serve in that capacity, including chairing meetings of the Board in the absence of the Chairperson/CEO

·    Has the authority to request meetings of the Board of Directors and drafts the agenda for each meeting

·    Chairs board meetings and meetings of shareholders

Executive Session Responsibilities

·    Has the authority to call meetings of the Independent Directors

·    Chairs executive sessions of the non-management directors

·    Sets the agenda for executive sessions

·    Meets separately with the Chair/CEO after executive sessions to review the matters discussed during the executive sessions

·    Receives full feedback from Lead Independent Director on the matters discussed in executive sessions and required follow-up
Board Communications Responsibilities

·    Facilitates communication among the non- management Directors on key issues and concerns outside of Board meetings

·    Serves as the principal, but non-exclusive, liaison and intermediary between the CEO and the Independent Directors regarding views, concerns, and issues of the Independent Directors

·    Functions as a resource to the CEO on Board issues and other matters affecting the Company

·    Communicates with all Directors on key issues and concerns outside of Board meetings

·    Expected to inform the Lead Independent Director of all significant issues facing the Company

Board Agenda and Information Responsibilities

·    Collaborates with the Chair/CEO to set the Board meeting agendas and communicates Board information

·    Seeks Board meeting agenda input from other Directors

·    Drafts the Board meeting agendas and works with Lead Independent Director to ensure that the requisite agendas and information is provided to the Board for it to fulfill its duties
External Stakeholder Responsibilities

·    Reviews responses to direct shareholder communications with the Board

·    If requested by major shareholder or the CEO, is available for consultation and direct communication

·    Represents the Company and interacts with external stakeholders and employees

18

Lead Independent Director RoleChair/CEO Role
Strategy and Execution Responsibilities
·    Collaborates with the Board and the CEO to establish and support appropriate short term and long term strategies, objectives, goals, and programs that support sustainable growth and profitability.

·    Leads the management team to establish and support the development of appropriate short term and long term strategies

·    Leads the development of overall corporate and business unit objectives and goals

·    Develops and implements programs, and drives overall execution to achieve desired objectives and goals

Company Operations Responsibilities

·    Has no role in managing Company operations

·    Officers and employees report to the CEO, not to the Lead Independent Director

·    Leads Company operations

·    Officers and employees report to the CEO

Non-Management Executive Sessions

In order to give a significant voice to our non-management directors, our corporate governance guidelines provide for executive sessions of our non-management and independent directors. Our board believes this is an important governance practice that enables the Board to discuss matters (such as strategy, CEO and management performance, succession planning and board effectiveness) without management present.

Our non-management directors our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide forgenerally meet in executive sessions of our independent directors.session following each regularly scheduled Board meeting. Our independent directors have established a policy to meet separately from the other directors in regularly scheduled executive sessions at least twice annually, and at such other times as may be deemed appropriate by the Company’s independent directors. As specified in the Corporate Governance Guidelines, ourOur Lead Independent Director presides at all executive sessions of the independent directors and non-management directors, and sets the agenda for such executive sessions. Any independent director may call an executive session of independent directors at any time. The independent directors met twiceeight times in executive session in 2013. Interested parties, including the Company’s shareholders, may communicate directly with non-management directors by sending written communications to Non-Management Directors, c/o Corporate Secretary, Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida, 815 Colorado Avenue, P. O. Box 9012, Stuart, Florida 34995.2016.

Committee Structure & Other Matters

 

Oversight is also provided through the extensive work of the Board’s committees – Audit;Audit Committee; Compensation and Governance; andGovernance Committee (“CGC”); Enterprise Risk Management Committee (“ERMC”); and Strategy and Innovation (S&I) Committee – in key areas such as financial reporting, internal controls, compliance, corporate governance, succession planning, compensation programs, strategic planning and risk management. The Audit Committee and the Compensation and Governance CommitteeCGC consist entirely of independent, non-management directors.

 

In addition, at the end of each year, the Board and each of its committees review a schedule of agenda topics to be considered in the coming year. Each Board and committee member may raise subjects that are not on the agenda at any meeting and suggest items for inclusion in future agendas.

 

19

The Company believes that the foregoing structure, policies, and practices, when combined with the Company’s other governance policies and procedures, provide appropriate opportunities for oversight, discussion, and evaluation of decisions and direction from the Board of Directors.

 

Shareholder Engagement and Board Responsiveness

The company engages with our shareholders to ensure that the Board and management are aware of and address issues of importance to our investors. We regularly meet with various institutional shareholders and welcome feedback from other shareholders, which is considered by the Board or appropriate Board committee.

The company communicates with shareholders in a number of ways:

·Discussing important business developments and answering shareholder questions at annual meetings;
·Holding conference calls regarding quarterly earnings and significant corporate developments;
·Through this proxy statement, chairman’s letters, news releases, website, participation in industry conferences, and other periodic events.

The Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines provide for a process by which shareholders may communicate with the Board, a Board committee or the non-management directors as a group, or other individual directors. Shareholders who wish to communicate with the Board of Directors, a Board committee, the Lead Independent Director, Nominating Processother directors or an individual director may do so by sending written communications addressed to the Board of Directors, a Board committee or such group of directors or individual director, c/o Corporate Secretary, Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida, 815 Colorado Avenue, P.O. Box, 9012, Stuart, Florida 34995. All communications will be compiled by the Company’s Secretary and submitted to the Board of Directors, a committee of the Board of Directors or the appropriate group of directors or individual director, as appropriate, at the next regular meeting of the Board.

Since 2009 the Company has annually included in its proxy statement a separate advisory vote on the compensation paid to its executives, as disclosed in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the compensation tables and related proxy disclosure, commonly known as a “say-on-pay” proposal. Independent surveys have shown that an annual vote is the preferred frequency of most institutional investors. Our Board also endorses an annual vote as we believe it gives shareholders an opportunity to voice their concerns with respect to executive compensation. Shareholder support of our say-on-pay proposal at our 2016 annual meeting declined compared to prior years. (See “Outcome of our 2016 Say-On-Pay vote” in the table below.) Shareholder support of directors standing for re-election at the 2016 annual meeting also dropped compared to prior year. To better understand shareholder interests and concerns, we expanded our shareholder outreach in 2016, taking the following actions:

20

·Members of our Board and executive management team met in-person and by phone with shareholders representing a significant portion of Seacoast’s outstanding unaffiliated shares.
·In March 2016, the Company entered into an Observer Rights Agreement with one of our largest shareholder, Basswood Capital Management, L.L.C. (“Basswood”) and Matthew Lindenbaum, a principal of Basswood, pursuant to which we gave Mr. Lindenbaum the right to attend all meetings of our Board of Directors in a non-voting observer capacity, and to receive materials provided to board members, subject to certain exceptions. The agreement can be terminated by either party at any time, but remains in effect. Mr. Lindenbaum’s viewpoint on matters impacting institutional investors has been very insightful and beneficial to the Company.
·We have hosted visits with a number of large investors at our facilities in Stuart to provide them with a better understanding of the depth and talent of our management team, the execution of our balanced strategy and our progress in creating shareholder value.
·We hosted an Investor Day and webcast on February 22, 2017, where Seacoast’s management team provided a detailed update of the Company’s strategy and long-term vision.

In these meetings, our shareholders expressed a wide range of viewpoints relating to our performance, compensation, governance and other matters. This engagement process was very informative and constructive.

Below are highlights of the feedback we have received from shareholders and our Board’s response:

What We HeardOur Board’s Response
Improve financial performance to deliver results expected from acquisitionsDelivered Promised Results.Achieved our 2016 earnings target of $1.00 fully diluted adjusted earnings per share1 (“EPS”) despite economic headwinds. Improved adjusted efficiency ratio1 by 12% year over year, and from 74.9% in fourth quarter of 2014 to 60.8% in the fourth quarter of 2016.
Higher stock ownership by management and directorsReplacing Cash Bonuses with Equity.Replaced 2016 cash bonuses paid to executive officers for achievement of performance objectives with performance based and performance-contingent stock awards. All of our directors are paid a stock retainer; several participated in our recent capital raise.
Reduce Board tenure and the risk of entrenchmentThree New Directors.In 2016, our Board appointed two new directors, Timothy S. Huval and Herbert Lurie, further enforcing its commitment to a balanced mix of new directors with fresh perspectives and, for continuity, seasoned, experienced directors with deep knowledge of the Company and its markets. In 2017, our Board has nominated another new Board member, Alvaro Monserrat, to replace a longer-tenured director. In addition, two long-tenured directors rotated off the CGC in 2016 and one short-tenured director was added, resulting in the majority of the CGC now comprised of short-tenured directors.

1 Non-GAAP measure; refer to Appendix A - Informtion Regarding Non-GAAP Financial Measures.

21

What We HeardOur Board’s Response
Concerns regarding our severance payments under Change-in-Control agreements and award agreementsModifications to Existing Named Executive Officer (“NEO”) Change-in-Control (“CIC”) Agreements.In September 2016, we entered into new CIC agreements with our NEOs which: i) eliminate excise tax gross-up payments, and ii) do not provide benefits that are paid before a CIC closes or if the acquirer retains the executive. Since 2015, our equity award agreements require a CIC and job loss or failure of the acquirer to convert awards into new issuer awards before vesting occurs.
Outcome of our 2016 Say-On-Pay voteAt our 2016 annual meeting of shareholders, our say-on-pay proposal received the support of 67.6% of the votes cast. In contrast, since 2009, our previous annual say-on-pay proposals received support of over 94% of the votes cast. Our CGC considered the vote in relation to: 1) the alignment of our compensation program with the long-term interests of our shareholders, 2) the evolution of our business strategy with emerging opportunities and in fulfilling customer demand for innovative products and services, and 3) the relationship between risk-taking and the incentive compensation provided to our executives. The CGC will continue to evaluate and refine our executive compensation plan to place greater emphasis on creating shareholder value, long-term performance and profitability based on emerging opportunities.
Suggestion to better articulate our business strategyWe have redoubled our efforts in our quarterly communications with shareholders and investors, and our enhanced our investor outreach, to convey our balanced business strategy of: 1) organic growth, 2) accretive and thoughtful M&A, and 3) innovation and digitally-engaged distribution. We formed the S&I Committee to provide oversight of these efforts.

The Board and the CGC will continue to monitor best practices, future advisory votes on executive compensation and other shareholder feedback to guide it in addressing issues of importance to our investors.

Management Succession Planning and Development

Our Board understands that a strong succession framework reduces Company risk and therefore ensures that appropriate attention is given to identifying and developing talented leaders. Consequently, we have a robust management succession and development plan which is reviewed and updated annually.

22

The Board maintains oversight responsibility for succession planning with respect to the position of CEO and monitors and advises management regarding succession planning for other executive officers. The Board’s goal is to have a long-term and continuing program for effective senior leadership development and succession. The Board also has short-term contingency plans in place for emergency and unexpected occurrences, such as the sudden departure, death, or disability of our CEO or other executive officers.

 

The CompensationCGC, working with the CEO, annually evaluates succession planning at the senior levels of management and Governance Committeereports the results of such evaluation to the Board, along with recommendations on management development and succession planning. The updated succession plan is reviewed and approved by the Board to ensure that competencies are in alignment with our strategic plan. The annual review of the CEO succession planning includes a review of specific individuals identified as active CEO succession candidates, and each of those individuals is reviewed with respect to progress in his or her current job position and progress toward meeting his or her defined leadership development plan. The Company’s CEO and senior management are similarly responsible for supporting “next generation” leadership development by: identifying core talent, skills and capabilities of future leaders within the Company; assessing the individuals against leadership capabilities; identifying talent and skill gaps and development needs; assisting with internal candidate development; and identifying significant external hiring needs.

The Board and individual Board members may meet with, advise and assist CEO succession candidates and become familiar with other senior and future leaders within the Company. Directors are encouraged to become sufficiently familiar with the Company’s executive officers to be able to provide perspective on the experience, capabilities and performance of potential CEO candidates. The Board urges senior management, as well as other members of management who have future leadership potential within the Company, to attend and present at Board meetings so that each can be given appropriate exposure to the Board. The Board may contact and meet with any employee of the Company at any time, and are encouraged to make site visits, to meet with management, and to attend Company, industry and other events.

23

Executive Officers

Executive officers are appointed annually at the organizational meeting of the respective Boards of Directors of Seacoast and the Bank, to serve until the next annual meeting and until successors are chosen and qualified.

Dennis S. Hudson, III

Age: 61

Education: MBA,

Florida State University 

Tenure with Seacoast:

40 years

CURRENT ROLE:
Chairman and CEO of Seacoast and Bank
SELECT PRIOR EXPERIENCE:
·   Chairman of Seacoast since July 2005
·   CEO of Seacoast since June 1998
·   Chairman and CEO of the Bank since 1992
·   Director of Seacoast since 1984
·   40 years of banking experience with Seacoast
OTHER AFFILIATIONS/CERTIFICATIONS:

·   Member of board of directors and audit committee of Chesapeake Utilities Corporation, Dover, DE
·  Board member, Miami Branch of Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta from 2005 to 2010
·   Independent director, PENN Capital Funds, a mutual fund group managed by PENN Capital Management
·   Served on boards of Martin County YMCA Foundation, Council on Aging, American Heart Association, and as Chairman of the Economic Council of Martin County

Stephen A. Fowle

Age: 51

Education: MBA,

Northwestern University

Tenure with Seacoast:

2 years

CURRENT ROLE:

EVP and former CFO of Seacoast and
Bank from April 2015 to March 15, 2017

SELECT PRIOR EXPERIENCE:

·  CFO of WSFS Financial Corporation, a $4.9 billion publicly-traded financial institution in Wilmington, Delaware, from 2005 to March 2015 

·  CFO at Third Federal Savings and Loan Association of Cleveland, MHC, an $8+ billion multibank holding company of 15+ subsidiaries, from 2000 to 2004 

OTHER AFFILIATIONS/CERTIFICATIONS:

·Member, Financial Executives International

24

Charles K. Cross, Jr.

Age: 59
Education: BSBA,
University of Florida
Tenure with Seacoast: 5 years

CURRENT ROLE:
EVP of Commercial Banking of Bank since July 2013
SELECT PRIOR EXPERIENCE:
·  Seacoast’s SVP & Commercial Market Executive for Palm Beach County from March 2012 to July 2013
·  30 years of banking experience and thorough knowledge of Palm Beach and Broward County markets
·  Market leader for EverBank in Palm Beach County, FL from August 2010 to March 2012
OTHER AFFILIATIONS/CERTIFICATIONS:
·  Chairman, District Board of Trustees of Palm Beach State College
·  Past board member of Florida Atlantic University College of Business Dean’s Council, Economic Council of Palm Beach County, West Palm Beach Chamber of Commerce, Business Development Board of Palm Beach County and Black Business Investment Corporation.

David D. Houdeshell

Age: 56
Education: MBA, The Stonier
Graduate School of Banking
Tenure with Seacoast: 7 years

CURRENT ROLE:
EVP and Chief Risk Officer of Seacoast and Bank since May 2015
SELECT PRIOR EXPERIENCE:
·   EVP and Chief Credit Officer of Seacoast and Bank since June 2010
·   EVP and Credit Administrative Executive for The South Financial Group in Greenville, SC for 3 years
·   Chief Credit Officer of Bombardier Capital, a financial services entity of a global transportation manufacturer, for 4 years
OTHER AFFILIATIONS/CERTIFICATIONS:
·   Member of audit & compliance committee of Martin Health System, Stuart, FL

25

Charles M. Shaffer

Age: 43
Education: MBA,
University of Central Florida
Tenure with Seacoast: 19 years

CURRENT ROLE:
EVP, CFO and Head of Strategy of Seacoast and Bank since March 15, 2017
SELECT PRIOR EXPERIENCE:

·   EVP and Community Banking Group of Bank from October 2013 to March 2017

·   SVP and Controller of Bank from 2005 to 2013

·   Diverse experience from multiple roles including strategy, corporate finance, traditional sales, and alternative sales platforms

OTHER AFFILIATIONS/CERTIFICATIONS:

·   CPA licensed in Florida

·   Chartered Global Management Accountant

·   Board member, United Way of Martin County

·   Board member, Girl Scouts of Southeast Florida

Management Stock Ownership

As of the Record Date, based on available information, all directors, director nominees and executive officers of Seacoast as a group (19 persons) beneficially owned approximately 1,286,400 outstanding shares of common stock, constituting 3.2% of the total number of shares of common stock outstanding at that date. In addition, as of the Record Date, various subsidiaries of Seacoast, as fiduciaries, custodians, and agents, had sole or shared voting power over 49,621 outstanding shares, or 0.1% of the outstanding shares, of Seacoast common stock, including shares held as trustee or agent of various Seacoast employee benefit and stock purchase plans.

Director Nomination Process

The CGC serves as the nominating committee of the Company. The Committeecommittee annually reviews and makes recommendations to the full Board of Directors regarding the composition and size of the Board of Directors and its committees, and if determined necessary, recommends potential candidates to the Board for nomination for election to the Board.Board by the Company’s shareholders. The CGC’s goal is to ensure that the Board of Directors consists of a diverse group of members with the proper expertise, skills, personal attributes and personal and professional backgrounds who, individually and collectively, are appropriate to achieve the Company’s strategic vision and business objectives, and best serve the Company’s and shareholders’ long-term interests.

 

26

As part of the assessment process, the Compensation and Governance CommitteeCGC evaluates whether the addition of a director or directors with particular attributes, experience, or skill sets could enhance the Board’s effectiveness. During the candidate search process, the CommitteeThe CGC identifies director candidates through business, civic and legal contacts, and may consult with other directors and senior officers andof the Company. The CGC may also hire a search firm to assisthelp it to identify, evaluate and conduct due diligence on potential director candidates. Once a candidate has been identified, the CommitteeCGC confirms that the candidate meets the minimum qualifications for Directordirector nominees, and gathers information about the candidate through interviews, questionnaires, background checks, or any other means that the CommitteeCGC deems to be helpful in the evaluation process. Director candidates are interviewed by a Co-Chairmanthe Chairman of the Compensation and Governance CommitteeCGC and at least one other member of the committee. Each member of the committee participates in the review and discussion of director candidates. Where appropriate, directors who are not on the CommitteeCGC are encouraged to meet with and evaluate the suitability of potential candidates. The CommitteeCGC then evaluates the qualities and skills of each candidate, both on an individual basis and taking into account the overall composition and needs of the Board in relation to the Company’s strategic goals, and recommends nominees to the Board. The full Board formally nominates candidates for director to be included in the slate of directors presented for shareholder vote based upon the recommendations of the Compensation and Governance CommitteeCGC following this process.

 

Given the evolving needs and challengesbusiness strategy of the Company, the Compensation and Governance CommitteeCGC believes that the Board of Directors as a whole should have diversity of thought and experience, which may, at any one or more times, include differences with respect to personal, educational or professional experience, gender, ethnicity, national origin, geographic representation, community involvement and age. However, the Compensation and Governance CommitteeCGC does not assign specific weights to any particular criteria. Its goal is to identify nominees that, considered as a group, will possess the talents and characteristics necessary for the Board of Directors to fulfill its responsibilities.responsibilities and advance our strategic mission. In addition, each director must have the qualifications if any, set forth in the Company’s Bylaws, as well as the following qualifications:personal characteristics and core competencies described below as our Director Eligibility Guidelines:

Director Eligibility Guidelines
Personal Characteristics·Core Competencies

·the highest ethical character an appropriate

·     a personal and professional reputation and must share theconsistent with Seacoast’s values of the Company as reflected in its Code of Conduct;

Conduct

 

·

the ability to exercise sound business judgment; and
judgment

 

·     a willingness to listen to differing points of view and work in a mutually respectful manner

·     the absence of any real or perceived conflict of interest that would impair the director’s ability to act in the interest of shareholders

·

·substantial business or professional experience and be able to offer meaningful advice and guidance to the Company’s management based on that experience.experience

·     professional achievement through service as a principal executive of a major company, partner in a law or accounting firm, successful entrepreneur, a prominent academic or similar position of significant responsibility

 

27

The Compensation and Governance CommitteeCGC also considers numerous other qualities, skills and characteristics when evaluating director nominees, such as:as a candidate’s:

 

·an understanding of and experience in the financial services industry, as well as accounting, finance, legal, real estate, corporate governance and technology expertise;

·leadership experience with public companies or other major organizations, as well as civic and community relationships; and

·qualificationsavailability and commitment to carry out the responsibilities as a director;

·knowledge, experience and skills that enhance the mix of the Board’s core competencies and provide a different perspective; and

·qualification as an independent director.

 

AnyIn addition to nominations by the CGC, any Company shareholder entitled to vote generally on the election of directors may recommend a candidate for nomination as a director. A shareholder may recommend a director nominee by submitting the name and qualificationsproviding advance notice of the candidate the shareholder wishes to recommendsuch proposed nomination to the Corporate Secretary at the Company’s Compensation and Governance Committee, c/o Seacoast Banking Corporationprincipal offices. The written submission must comply with the applicable provision in the Company’s Articles of Florida, 815 Colorado Avenue, P. O. Box 9012, Stuart, Florida 34995.Incorporation. To be considered, recommendations with respect to an election of directors to be held at an annual meeting must be received not less than 60 days nor more than 90 days prior to the anniversary of the Company’s last annual meeting of shareholders (or, if the date of the annual meeting is changed by more than 20 days from such anniversary date, within 10 days after the date that the Company mails or otherwise gives notice of the date of the annual meeting to shareholders), and recommendations with respect to an election of directors to be held at a special meeting called for that purpose must be received by the 10th day following the date on which notice of the special meeting was first mailed to shareholders. Recommendations meeting these requirements will be brought to the attention of the Company’s Compensation and Governance Committee.CGC. Candidates for director recommended by shareholders arein compliance with these provisions and who satisfy the Director Eligibility Guidelines will be afforded the same consideration as candidates for director identified by Company directors, executive officers or search firms, if any, employed by the Company. In 2013, there were2016, no shareholder nominee recommendations were received.

 

Since last year’s annual meeting, three directors, Dennis J. Arczynski, Julie H. Daum and Maryann Goebel, were elected to the Company’s  

28

Board of Directors. Dennis J. Arczynski has served as a director of the Bank since 2007, and was identified by the Compensation and Governance Committee as an appropriate candidate to replace retiring Seacoast director John H. Crane.Evaluation Process

 

In May 2013, the Board retained Spencer Stuart to conduct a director candidate search for two additional directors. In this capacity, Spencer Stuart conducted an extensive search for candidates with the experience, skills, and characteristics that the Compensation and Governance Committee had identified for potential candidates, and presented the most qualified candidates to the Committee for consideration. During this process, the Committee asked Julie H. Daum, who was leading Spencer Stuart’s search on behalf of the Company, whether she would consider joining Seacoast’s Board of Directors. Following the formal nomination process described above, Ms. Daum was appointed to the Board in October 2013.

Annually, our Board and each Board committee evaluate their performance and effectiveness, along with processes and structure, to identify areas for enhancement. The process is described below.

 

Maryann Goebel was initially identified as a potential candidate for the Board by Spencer Stuart, and her appointment to the Board and nomination for election at the 2014 Annual Shareholders’ Meeting was a result of the process outlined above.

Shareholder Communications

ElementDescription
Corporate Governance Review and Investor FeedbackThe CGC reviews corporate governance principles with consideration given to generally accepted practices and feedback from investors and advocacy groups and makes recommendations for Board changes. This committee also oversees the process for annual board evaluations.
Annual Board & Committee Self-EvaluationsThe Board and committee evaluations for 2016 were conducted through a questionnaire completed by each director or committee member and reviewed s described below.
Summary and ReviewFor the 2016 Board evaluation, an independent consultant to the CGC compiled and summarized the Board evaluation responses, including comments, which were then reviewed by Lead Independent Director Goldman and Chairman Hudson. Committee evaluations were reviewed by the respective committee chairs. Chairman Hudson discussed the individual results of the Board evaluation with each director, and together with Lead Independent Director Goldman, presented summary results to the Board. The committee chairs discussed the results with their respective committees and the full Board.
ActionsAs a result of the Board evaluation process, the Board conducted a rigorous search and assessment of experienced potential new director candidates. Following this search, the Board selected Alvaro Monserrat asa director nominee for the 2017 Annual Meeting.

 

The Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines provide for a process by which shareholders may communicate with the Board, a Board committee or the non-management directors as a group, or other individual directors. Shareholders who wish to communicate with the Board of Directors, a Board committee, the Lead Director or any other directors or an individual director may do so by sending written communications addressed to the Board of Directors of Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida, a Board committee or such group of directors or individual director, c/o Corporate Secretary, Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida, 815 Colorado Avenue, P. O. Box, 9012, Stuart, Florida 34995. All communications will be compiled by the Company’s Secretary and submitted to the Board of Directors, a committee of the Board of Directors or the appropriate group of directors or individual director, as appropriate, at the next regular meeting of the Board.BOARD MEETINGS AND BOARD COMMITTEES 

 

Corporate Governance Guidelines

The Board of Directors has adopted the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines that are available on the Company’s website atwww.seacoastbanking.net, or without charge, upon written request to Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida, c/o Corporate Secretary, 815 Colorado Avenue, P. O. Box 9012, Stuart, Florida 34995.

Code of Conduct and Ethics

The Board of Directors has adopted a Code of Conduct applicable to all directors, officers and employees and a Code of Ethics for Financial Professionals applicable to the Company’s chief executive officer and its chief financial officer, both of which are available on the Company’s website atwww.seacoastbanking.net, or without charge, upon written request to Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida, c/o Corporate Secretary, 815 Colorado Avenue, P. O. Box 9012, Stuart, Florida 34995. The Company will post on its website any amendment to or waiver from a provision of its Code of Conduct or Code of Ethics for Financial Professionals.

Board Meeting Attendance

 

The Board of Directors held eight regular meetings threeand two special meetings and one joint strategic planning meeting with the Bank’s board of directors during 2013.2016. All of the directors attended at least 75 percent75% of the total number of meetings of the Board of Directors and committees on which they served.

Annual Meeting Attendance

Ten of the Company’s 12 then-incumbent Directors attended the Company’s 20132016 annual shareholders’ meeting. The Company encourages all of its directors to attend its shareholders’ meetings and all meetings of the Board of Directors and committees on which the directors serve.but understands that situations may arise that prevent such attendance.

 

29

Risk Oversight

  

The Board of Directors maintains oversight responsibility for the management of the Company’s risks. A fundamental part of risk management is not only anticipating and understanding the risks the Company faces and the steps management is taking to manage those risks, but also understanding what level of risk is appropriate for the Company. The Board believes that risk management is an integral part of the Company’s annual strategic planning process which addresses, among other things, the risks and opportunities facing Seacoast. The types of risks that the Company faces include:

·macro-economic risks, such as inflation, reductions in economic growth, or recession;

·political or regulatory risks, such as restriction on access to markets;

·event risks, such as natural disasters; and

·business specific risks related to strategy, financial reporting, credit, asset/liability management, market, operational execution (corporate governance, legal and regulatory compliance), and reputation.

While the Board of Directors maintains the ultimate oversight responsibility for risk management, the Company has adopted an enterprise risk management initiative to assist the Board. This process involves the Board of Directors, management and other personnel in an integrated effort to identify, assess, prioritize and manage the risks that affect our ability to execute on our corporate strategy and fulfill our long-term business objectives. This holistic process includes the development of plans to balance and manage these risks or mitigate their effects. As part of this process, the Board and its committees have been assigned responsibility for risk management oversight of specific areas.

The Enterprise Risk Management Committee (“ERMC”) assists the Board in overseeing the integration of risk management at the Company, monitoring the risk framework which enables the full Board to identify, consider, and oversee critical issues and opportunities. The Board adopts a risk appetite based on ERMC’s comprehensive assessment of Seacoast’s key risks, the interrelationships between these key risks, and their relative rewards. The ERMC may also propose strategic actions that determine the short, medium, and long term risk posture of Seacoast; and recommends to the Board risk-based decisions to achieve Seacoast’s strategic, operational and financial objectives.

The Audit Committee is charged with overseeing the Company’s financial risk management process each year, including ensuring that management has taken steps to monitor, control and report such risks and reviewing with management the most significant risks identified and management’s plans for addressing and mitigating the potential effects of such risks.

The Compensation and Governance Committee oversees risks and exposures related to the Company’s programs and policies for corporate governance and director succession planning. The Compensation and Governance Committee also has oversight responsibility related to executive compensation matters. In addition, the Compensation and Governance Committee assists the Board with its leadership assessment and succession planning with respect to the position of CEO, and monitors and advises on management’s succession planning for other executive officers.

Succession Planning & Management Development

Our Board understands that a strong succession framework reduces risk to the organization and therefore ensures that appropriate attention is given to identifying and developing talented leaders. The Board maintains oversight responsibility for planning for succession with respect to the position of CEO and monitoring and advising on management’s succession planning for other executive officers. The Board’s goal is to have a long-term and continuing program for effective senior leadership development and succession. The Board also has short-term contingency plans in place for emergency and unexpected occurrences, such as the sudden departure, death, or disability of the CEO or other executive officers.

The Compensation and Governance Committee, working with the CEO, annually evaluates succession planning at the senior levels of management and reports the results of such evaluation to the Board, along with recommendations on management development and succession planning. The updated succession plan is reviewed and approved by the Board to ensure that competencies are in alignment with the strategic plan. The annual review of the CEO succession planning process includes a review of specific individuals identified as active CEO succession candidates, and each of those individuals is reviewed with respect to progress in his or her current job position and progress toward meeting his or her defined leadership development plan. The Company’s CEO and senior management are similarly responsible for supporting “next generation” leadership development by: identifying core talent, skills and capabilities of future leaders within the Company; assessing the individuals against leadership capabilities; identifying talent and skill gaps and development needs; assisting with internal candidate development; and identifying significant external hire needs.

The Board and individual Board members may meet with, advise and assist CEO succession candidates and become familiar with other senior and future leaders in the Company. Directors are encouraged to become sufficiently familiar with the Company’s executive officers to be able to provide perspective on the experience, capabilities and performance of potential CEO candidates. The Board urges senior management, as well as other members of management who have future leadership potential within the Company, to attend and present at Board meetings so that each can be given appropriate exposure to the Board. The Board may contact and meet with any employee of the Company at any time, and are encouraged to make site visits, to meet with management, and to attend Company, industry and other events.

Board Committees

 

The Company’s Board of Directors has threefour standing permanent committees: the Audit Committee, the Compensation and Governance Committee, and the Enterprise Risk Management Committee, and the Strategy and Innovation Committee. These committees serve the same functions for the Company and the Bank. The current composition of each Company committee is set forth in the below table.

Director NameAudit

Compensation &

Governance

Enterprise Risk

Management

Dennis J. ArczynskiX(1)
Stephen Bohner(2)X
T. Michael Crook(2)XX
H. Gilbert Culbreth, Jr.(2)X(1)
Julie H. Daum(2)X
Christopher E. Fogal(2)X(1)
Maryann Goebel  (2)XX
Roger O. Goldman(2) (3)
Robert B. Goldstein(2)X(1)X
Dale M. Hudson
Dennis S. Hudson, Jr.X
Dennis S. Hudson, III
Thomas E. Rossin(2)X
Edwin E. Walpole(2)X

(1)Committee Chairman

(2)Independent director

(3)Independent Lead Director who serves as an ex-officio (non-voting) member of all committees.

Audit Committeetable underProxy Summary - Board and Governance Highlights.

 

Each committee has a charter specifying such committee’s responsibilities and duties. The Audit Committee is currently composed of Mr. Fogal (Chairman), Mr. Crook and Ms. Goebel, all of whom the Board of Directors has determinedCGC charters are independent directors under Nasdaq and SEC rules. The Board of Directors has also determined that Mr. Fogal is an “audit committee financial expert” as defined by the SEC. The Audit Committee has the responsibilities set forth in the Audit Committee charter, as adopted by the full Board of Directors, including reviewing Seacoast’s and its subsidiaries’ financial statements and internal accounting controls, and reviewing reports of regulatory authorities and determining that all audits and examinations required by lawreviewed annually. These charters are performed. The Audit Committee charter is available on the Company’s website atwww.seacoastbanking.net www.SeacoastBanking.com or upon written request to c/o Corporate Secretary, Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida, 815 Colorado Avenue, P. O. Box 9012, Stuart, Florida 34995. The Audit Committee appoints the independent auditors, reviews their audit plan, and reviews with the independent auditors the results of the audit and management’s response thereto. The Audit Committee also reviews the adequacy of the internal audit budget and personnel, the internal audit plan and schedule, and results of audits performed by the internal audit staff. The Audit Committee is responsible for overseeing the audit function and appraising the effectiveness of internal and external audit efforts. The Audit Committee also reviews the procedures for the receipt, retention and treatment of complaints received by the Company regarding accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters, and changes to the Company’s Code of Conduct, and approves related party transactions. The Audit Committee periodically reports its findings to the Board of Directors. This committee held seven meetings in 2013. During one of the meetings, the Audit Committee met once in private session with our independent auditor, once in private session without members of management present, and once in private session with individual members of management.

Compensation and Governance Committeerequest.

 

In January 2013, the Salary and BenefitsAudit Committee and the Nominating and Governance Committee of the Company were combined to form the Compensation and Governance Committee. The two committees were combined as part of a comprehensive review of the Company’s and the Bank’s committee structure by the Company’s Board of Directors intended to reduce redundancy, create greater efficiencies, and clarify roles and responsibilities while preserving corporate governance and Board oversight. The

Members:

Christopher E. Fogal (Chair), Dennis J. Arczynski and Maryann Goebel

Comprised of members who have not participated in the preparation of the financial statements of the Company or any current subsidiary at any time during the last three fiscal years.
As set forth in the Audit Committee charter, as adopted by the full Board of Directors, this committee:
Responsibilities:

·      reviews Seacoast’s and its subsidiaries’ financial statements and internal accounting controls, and reviews reports of regulatory authorities and determines that all audits and examinations required by law are performed;

·      appoints the independent auditors, reviews their audit plan, and reviews with the independent auditors the results of the audit and management’s response thereto;

·      reviews the adequacy of the internal audit budget and personnel, the internal audit plan and schedule, and results of audits performed by the internal audit staff and those outsourced to a third party;

·      oversees the audit function and appraises the effectiveness of internal and external audit efforts;

·       reviews the procedures for the receipt, retention and treatment of complaints received by the Company regarding accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters, and changes to the Company’s Code of Conduct, and approves related party transactions; and 

·      periodically reports its findings to the Board of Directors. 

# of Meetings:This committee held nine meetings in 2016. Following these meetings, the Audit Committee met two times in private session with our independent auditor, and two times in private session without members of management present, but with a third party accounting firm who co-sources a portion of the Company’s internal audit function.
Independence:Our Board has determined that each member of the committee is independent under Nasdaq and SEC rules. Our Board has also determined that Mr. Fogal is an “audit committee financial expert” as defined by Item 407 of Regulation S-K.

30

Compensation and Governance Committee is currently composed of Mr. Culbreth (Co-Chair), Mr. Goldstein (Co-Chair), Mr. Bohner, Ms. Daum and Mr. Walpole, all of whom the Board of Directors has determined are independent directors under Nasdaq and SEC rules. This committee has the authority set forth in its charter, and approved by the Board of Directors, including:(“CGC”)

 

Members:

·H. Gilbert Culbreth, Jr. (Chair), Julie H. Daum and Maryann Goebel.
determiningAs set forth in the CGC’s charter, and as adopted and approved by the full Board of Directors, this committee:

Responsibilities:

·      determines the compensation of the Company’s and the Bank’s key executive officers;

·

overseeing      oversees the preparation of a “compensation discussion and analysis” on executive compensation and an annual compensation committee report which is included herein under “Compensation and Governance Committee Report”;

 

·

administering      administers the provisions of the Company’s incentive compensation plans and other employee benefits plans;

 

·

identifying      identifies and recommends to the Board qualified individuals to serve as members of the boardboards of directors of the Company and/or the Bank;

 

·

recommending      oversees efforts to the boards of directors of the Companycreate a diverse workforce that fosters and the Bank the director nominees for the next annual meeting of shareholders;

supports an inclusive culture; 

·

taking      takes a leadership role in shaping corporate governance policies and practices, including recommending to the Board of Directors the corporate governance guidelines applicable to Seacoast and monitoring Seacoast’s compliance with these policies and guidelines; and

 

·

making      makes recommendations to the Board of Directors concerning management development and succession planning activities at the senior levels of management, including an appropriate successor in the event of the unexpected death, incapacity or resignation of the CEO.

The CGC has the resources and authority to discharge its responsibilities, including authority to retain and terminate any compensation consulting firms, director search firms, independent legal counsel and other compensation advisers used to assist in carrying out its responsibilities. The CGC may delegate to a subcommittee consisting of two or more members, to the extent permitted by applicable law, such of its duties and responsibilities as it deems appropriate and advisable.
# of Meetings:This committee held eight meetings in 2016.
Independence:Our Board of Directors has determined that each member of the committee is independent under Nasdaq and SEC rules.

CGC Interlocks

and Insider Participation:

None of the members of the committee is a former or current officer or employee of the company or any of its subsidiaries. None of them has any relationship with the Company requiring disclosure under this caption under the rules of the SEC.

 

The Compensation and Governance Committee has the resources and authority to discharge its responsibilities, including authority to retain and terminate any compensation consulting firms, director search firms, independent legal counsel and other compensation advisers used to assist in carrying out its responsibilities, including the sole authority to approve the fees and other retention terms for such consultants, lawyers, and advisers, with such fees to be borne by the Company. The committee may delegate to a subcommittee consisting of two or more members, to the extent permitted by applicable law, such of its duties and responsibilities as it deems appropriate and advisable. The committee periodically reports its activities to the Board of Directors. 

31

  

The responsibilities and duties of the Compensation and Governance Committee are more fully set out in the committee’s charter, available on the Company’s website atwww.seacoastbanking.net or upon written request to c/o Corporate Secretary, Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida, 815 Colorado Avenue, P. O. Box 9012, Stuart, Florida 34995. In 2013, the Compensation and Governance Committee held nine meetings.

Enterprise Risk Management Committee

The Enterprise Risk Management Committee (“ERMC”) is currently composed of Mr. Arczynski (Chair), Mr. Crook, Ms. Goebel, Mr. Goldstein, Mr. Hudson, Jr. and Mr. Rossin. This committee has the authority set forth in its charter, and approved by the Board of Directors, including:

 

Members:·

Dennis J. Arczynski (Chair), Stephen E. Bohner, T. Michael Crook, Maryann Goebel, Dennis S. Hudson, Jr. and Thomas E. Rossin

monitoring

As set forth in the ERMC’s charter, and as adopted and approved by the full Board of Directors, this committee:

Responsibilities:

·     monitors the risk framework to assist the full Board of Directors in identifying, considering, and overseeing critical issues and opportunities;

·

evaluating     evaluates strategic opportunities being considered by Seacoast from a risk perspective, highlightinghighlights key risk considerations embedded in such strategic opportunities, for the full Board, and makingmakes recommendations on courses of action to the Board based on the ERMC’ssuch evaluation;

 

·

providingprovides oversight of the risk management monitoring and reporting functions at Seacoast to help ensure these functions are independent of business line or risk-taking processes;

·

reviewing     reviews key management, systems, processes and decisions, and assessingassesses the integrity and adequacy of the risk management function of Seacoast to help build risk assessment data into critical business systems, and reporting anyreports significant issues to the Board;

 

·

making     makes recommendations to the Board regarding the Company’s risk appetite, limits and policies and reviewing the strategic plan to help ensure it aligns with the Board-approved risk appetite; and

 

·

recommending     recommends to the Board the capital policy consistent with the Company’s risk appetite and reviewing thereviews capital adequacy of Seacoast’s capital and its allocation to each line of business.

# of Meetings:This committee held five meetings in 2016.

 

Strategy and Innovation (“S&I”) Committee

Members:Thomas E. Rossin (Chair), Dennis J. Arczynski, Dennis S. Hudson, III, Timothy S. Huval and Herbert A. Lurie
As set forth in the S&I Committee charter, and as adopted and approved by the full Board of Directors, this committee:

Responsibilities:

·     supports, sources and/or challenges M&A activities related to banks and non-bank entities as pertinent to the Company’s stated strategic objectives;

·     supports, sources and/or challenges business model transformation activities including investments in technology and/or partners;

·     reviews capital allocations and planning to ensure an acceptable return on capital while ensuring timely exits from businesses that do not provide an acceptable return or have limited growth prospects;

·     ensures that the Company actively promotes and rewards a culture of innovation in a manner that benefits customers and shareholders;

·     ensures that appropriate strategic metrics and modeling capabilities are used in order to assess the strength of existing strategies and potential investments, aligned with the Company’s stated strategic objectives; and

·     ensures that management is effectively and consistently communicating with shareholders in a manner that is consistent with the Company’s broader strategic vision.

# of Meetings:This committee held seven meetings in 2016.

32

The ERMC hasBoard’s Role in Strategy and Risk Oversight

The Board of Directors actively reviews our long term strategy and the resourcesplans and authorityprograms that management develops to dischargeimplement our strategy. While the Board meets formally at least once every year to consider overall long term strategy, it generally reviews various elements of strategy, and our progress towards implementation, at every regular meeting. Under the leadership of Lead Independent Director Goldman, our directors are active in our strategic planning process and exercise robust oversight of and challenges to both strategies and our implementation of the strategies.

The Board believes that strategic risk is an exceptionally important risk element among a number of risks that the Company faces and works to ensure that this risk is appropriately managed in the context of the rapidly changing environment in which the Company and its responsibilities, including directcustomers operate. The Board does not believe this risk can be delegated and unrestricted access to Seacoast’sthe Board as a whole regularly spends a significant amount of its time engaged with management and non-management personnelin executive session discussing our long term strategy, the effectiveness of our plans to implement such strategy, and all corporate records. In exceptional circumstances,our progress against those plans.

The Board believes that an integral part of managing strategic risk is the appointment of a strong lead director to: i) regularly engage with the adviceCEO on an ongoing basis, ii) interact from time to time with other key members of management and consentother leaders throughout the Company to examine alignment around our chosen long-term strategy, and iii) ensure that the Board’s views are considered as our strategy evolves. The Board strongly believes that having an active and engaged lead director better ensures that the Board as a whole can serve as a credible challenge to management’s plans and programs and increases transparency into the fast-paced changes management is implementing.

The Board’s committees also work to ensure that we have the right alignment to support our long-term strategic direction including: (i) an active Board recruitment process focused on developing or acquiring the skill, experience and attributes of both individuals and the Board as a whole needed to support our strategy, (ii) ensuring an appropriate link is established between our compensation design and our long-term strategy to encourage and reward the achievement of our long-term goals and protect shareholder value by discouraging excessive risk, and (iii) ensuring that our risk management structure can effectively manage the inherent risks that underlie our strategy.

Other types of risks that the Company faces include:

·macro-economic risks, such as inflation, reductions in economic growth, or recession;

·political or regulatory risks, such as restriction on access to markets;

·event risks, such as natural disasters; and

·business specific risks related to financial reporting, credit, asset/liability management, market, operational execution (corporate governance, legal and regulatory compliance), and reputation.

Our ERMC regularly accesses our overall risk profile and oversees our risk management programs which are implemented by our chief risk officer.

33

AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

The Audit Committee is currently comprised of three directors, Christopher E. Fogal (Chair), Dennis J. Arczynski and Maryann Goebel.

The purpose of the full Board, theAudit Committee (the “Committee”) is authorized to: i) engage independent legal, accounting, and other advisors as it deems necessary to carry out its duties, and ii) compel management to develop and/or implement any additional procedures in support of risk policies. The committee may delegate to a subcommittee consisting of two or more members, to the extent permitted by applicable law, such of its duties and responsibilities as it deems appropriate and advisable. The committee periodically reports its activities toassist the Board of Directors.

The responsibilities and dutiesDirectors (the “Board”) of the Enterprise Risk Management Committee are more fully set out in the committee’s charter, available on the Company’s website atwww.seacoastbanking.net or upon written request to c/o Corporate Secretary, Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida 815 Colorado Avenue, P. O. Box 9012, Stuart, Florida 34995. In 2013,(the “Company”) in its general oversight of the ERMC held 12 meetings.Company’s accounting, auditing and financial reporting practices. Management is primarily responsible for the Company’s financial statements, systems of internal controls and compliance with applicable legal and regulatory requirements. The Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, Crowe Horwath LLP, for the year ended December 31, 2016 is responsible for performing an independent audit of the consolidated financial statements and expressing an opinion on the conformity of those financial statements with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, as well as expressing an opinion (pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting.

 

Executive OfficersThe members of the Committee are not professional auditors, and their functions are not intended to duplicate or to certify the activities of management and the independent registered public accounting firm, nor can the Committee certify that the Company’s registered public accounting firm is “independent” under applicable rules. The Committee serves a board-level oversight role, in which it provides advice, counsel and direction to management and the independent registered public accounting firm on the basis of the information it receives, discussions with management and the independent registered public accounting firm, and the experience of the Committee’s members in business, financial and accounting matters. To carry out its responsibilities, the Committee held nine meetings in 2016.

 

Executive officers are appointed annuallyIn the performance of its oversight responsibilities, the Committee has reviewed and discussed with management and Crowe Horwath LLP the audited financial statements of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2016. Management represented to the Committee that all financial statements were prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and that these statements fairly present the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the organizational meetingdates and for the periods described. The Committee has relied upon this representation without any independent verification, except for the work of Crowe Horwath LLP. The Committee also discussed these statements with Crowe Horwath LLP, both with and without management present, and has relied upon their reported opinion on these financial statements. The Committee’s review included discussion with Crowe Horwath LLP of the respective Boards of Directors of Seacoastmatters required to be discussed under Public Company Accounting Oversight Board standards.

With respect to the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, the Committee, among other things, discussed with Crowe Horwath LLP matters relating to its independence and received from Crowe Horwath LLP the written disclosures and the Bank followingletter required by applicable requirements of the annual meeting ofPublic Company shareholders, to serve untilAccounting Oversight Board regarding the next annual meeting and until successors are chosen and qualified.independent accountant’s communications with the Committee concerning independence.

34

 

Management Stock OwnershipOn the basis of these reviews and discussions, and subject to the limitations of its role, the Committee recommended that the Board approve the inclusion of the Company’s audited financial statements in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016, for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

The Audit Committee: 

Christopher E. Fogal, Chairman 

Dennis J. Arczynski 

Maryann Goebel 

March 14, 2017

OWNERSHIP OF OUR COMMON STOCK SHARES

The tables below provide information regarding the beneficial ownership of our common stock as of the Record Date by:

·each of the Company’s directors;

·each of the executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table;

·all current directors and executive officers as a group; and

·each beneficial owner of more than 5%.

 

As of the Record Date, March 20, 2014,40,729,656 shares of common stock were outstanding. Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with SEC rules and regulations. Unless otherwise indicated, and subject to community property laws where applicable, the Company believes that each of the shareholders named in the tables below has sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares indicated as beneficially owned. Some of the information in the tables is based on available information all directors, director nominees and executive officers of Seacoast as a group (19 persons) beneficially owned approximately 6,593,999 outstanding shares of Common Stock, constituting 25.4 percent ofincluded in filings made by the total number of shares of Common Stock outstanding at that date. In addition, as ofbeneficial owners with the Record Date, various subsidiaries of Seacoast, as fiduciaries, custodians, and agents, had sole or shared voting power over 121,410 outstanding shares, or less than 0.5 percent of the outstanding shares, of Seacoast Common Stock, including shares held as trustee or agent of various Seacoast employee benefit and stock purchase plans. See “Questions and Answers about the Proxy Solicitation Materials and the Proxy Solicitation” and “Security Ownership of Management and Certain Beneficial Holders.”

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION & ANALYSISSEC.

 

Overview

The Company’s executive compensation programs were influenced by several factors in 2013. During 2013, the Florida economy showed steady improvement. The housing market rebounded with home salesPrincipal Shareholders (5% Owners Exclusive of Directors and prices rising. Business activity picked up. Tourism, which has been growing for two years, remained strong. However, the national economic outlook remained uncertain during the year as a result of the impact of new federal health care law, continued high levels of unemployment and debate concerning the impacts of anticipated changes for both monetary and fiscal policy.

Seacoast achieved a number of significant milestones during 2013. Many of these milestones were important elements of our strategic plan which are expected to serve as a foundation for growth in the future. We grew our core operating earnings throughout the year. We ended the year with $52.0 million in net income, including a reversal of our tax valuation allowance of $40.4 million which significantly increased our tangible common equity. We successfully raised additional common equity to support future growth and redeemed all outstanding shares of our Series A Preferred Stock totaling $50 million. We reduced our total expense structure, while also rolling out our innovative Accelerate commercial banking platform in three Florida cities, increasing our investment in new digital products and adding new business bankers in every market we serve. In addition, we continued to produce improvements in asset quality and growth in our customer base.

The Company was a participant in the U.S. Department of the Treasury under the Capital Purchase Program (“CPP”) from December 2008 through March 2012. During this period, the Company was prohibited from offering certain bonuses or incentive compensation awards (other than certain long-term restricted stock awards), or paying severance benefits, to our five most highly compensated senior executive officers. During our participation in the CPP, the traditional components of our compensation program changed. Specifically, the relative portion of base salary to total direct compensation increased as a result of: i) the payment of additional salary in the form of stock, ii) the elimination of the annual cash incentive, iii) the exclusion of the use of stock options and stock appreciation rights, and iv) limits on the amount of restricted stock that could be granted.

After our participation in the CPP ended, the Compensation and Governance Committee, which we refer to in this section as the Committee, worked to develop a new executive compensation program that would support strong earnings performance and growth, reward our leadership team for delivering positive results, and build shareholder value without encouraging unnecessary risk-taking. The new program was partially implemented in 2013, with grants of stock options and performance-based restricted stock units. The remainder of the program, which includes annual incentive awards and short-term performance-based stock awards, is being implemented in 2014.Officers)

 

The following discussiontable sets forth information regarding the number and analysis describespercentage of shares of common stock held by all persons and entities known by the compensationCompany to beneficially own 5% or more of the Company’s outstanding common stock. The information regarding beneficial ownership of common stock by the entities identified below are included in reliance on reports filed by the entities with the SEC, except that the ownership percentage is based on the Company’s calculations.

Name of Beneficial OwnerAmount and Nature of Beneficial
Ownership
Percentage of
Outstanding Shares
Basswood Capital Management, LLC
645 Madison Avenue, 10th Floor2,355,043(1)6.2%
New York, NY 10022
BlackRock, Inc.
55 East 52nd Street2,692,607(2)7.1%
New York, NY 10055

1 Non-GAAP measure; refer to Appendix A - Informtion Regarding Non-GAAP Financial Measures.

35

(1)According to a Schedule 13D/A filed jointly by Basswood Capital Management, LLC, Matthew Lindenbaum, Bennett Lindenbaum, and their affiliates on December 12, 2016 with the SEC with respect to Seacoast common stock beneficially owned, each reporting person has shared voting and dispositive powers with respect to the following number of shares of Seacoast common stock:

Reporting Person# of Shares
Basswood Capital Management, LLC2,355,043
Basswood Partners, LLC430,430
Basswood Enhanced Long Short GP, LLC1,236,601
Basswood Financial Fund, LP180,649
Basswood Financial Fund, Inc.47,394
Basswood Financial Long Only Fund, LP38,576
Basswood Enhanced Long Short Fund, LP1,236,601
Basswood Opportunity Partners, LP211,205
Basswood Opportunity Fund, Inc.162,564
Matthew Lindenbaum2,355,043
Bennett Lindenbaum2,355,043

(2)According to a Schedule 13G/A filed by BlackRock, Inc. (“BlackRock”) on January 27, 2017 with the SEC with respect to Seacoast common stock beneficially owned as of December 31, 2016, BlackRock, Inc. has sole voting power with respect to 2,692,607 shares of Seacoast common stock and sole dispositive power with respect to 2,692,607 shares of Seacoast common stock. The Schedule 13G provides that BlackRock is a parent holding company and that the shares of common stock listed on the Schedule 13G are owned by various subsidiaries of BlackRock. In addition, BlackRock reported that various persons have the right to receive, or the power to direct the receipt of, dividends from, or the proceeds from the sale of, these shares of common stock, and that no one person is known to have more than 5% of Seacoast common stock.

 

36

Ownership of Directors and Executive Officers

Name of Beneficial Owner Amount and Nature of
Beneficial Ownership
  Percentage 
Dennis J. Arczynski  44,819(1)   X 
Stephen E. Bohner  54,452(2)   X 
Jacqueline L. Bradley  16,954(3)   X 
T. Michael Crook  85,566(4)   X 
H. Gilbert Culbreth, Jr.  68,054(5)   X 
Julie H. Daum  45,839(6)   X 
Christopher E. Fogal  31,075(7)   X 
Maryann Goebel  19,563(8)   X 
Roger O. Goldman  264,955(9)   X 
Dennis S. Hudson, Jr.  323,555(10)   X 
Dennis S. Hudson, III  409,813(11)   1.0%
Timothy S. Huval  1,255(12)   X 
Herbert A. Lurie  28,819(13)   X 
Alvaro J. Monserrat  5,142   X 
         
Thomas E. Rossin  18,237(14)   X 
Charles K. Cross, Jr.  33,780(15)   X 
Stephen A. Fowle  35,096(16)   X 
David D. Houdeshell  34,297(17)   X 
Charles M. Shaffer  34,304(18)   X 
All directors and executive officers as a group (19 persons)  1,148,923   2.8%

X Less than 1%

(1)Includes 1,672 shares held in a limited liability company, as to which shares Mr. Arczynski has sole voting and investment power. Also includes 9,110 shares held jointly with his wife, as to which shares Mr. Arczynski may be deemed to share both voting and investment power. Also includes 24,475 shares held in the Bank’s Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan for which receipt of such shares has been deferred, and as to which shares Mr. Arczynski has no voting or dispositive power. Also includes 5,561 shares that Mr. Arczynski has the right to acquire by exercising options that are exercisable within 60 days after the Record Date.

(2)Includes 15,702 shares held in the Bank’s Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan for which receipt of such shares has been deferred, and as to which shares Mr. Bohner has no voting or dispositive power. Also includes 5,561 shares that Mr. Bohner has the right to acquire by exercising options that are exercisable within 60 days after the Record Date.

37

(3)Includes 5,533 shares held in the Bank’s Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan for which receipt of such shares has been deferred, and as to which shares Ms. Bradley has no voting or dispositive power. Also includes 4,421 shares that Ms. Bradley has the right to acquire by exercising options that are exercisable within 60 days after the Record Date.

(4)Includes 17,800 shares held jointly with Mr. Crook’s wife and 2,800 shares held by Mr. Crook’s wife, as to which shares Mr. Crook may be deemed to share both voting and investment power. Also includes 42,032 shares held in the Bank’s Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan for which receipt of such shares has been deferred, and as to which shares Mr. Crook has no voting or dispositive power. Also includes 5,561 shares that Mr. Crook has the right to acquire by exercising options that are exercisable within 60 days after the Record Date.

(5)Includes 10,000 shares held in an IRA, 26,000 shares held in a family limited liability company, and 8,200 shares held in a family sub-S corporation, as to which shares Mr. Culbreth has sole voting and investment power. Also includes 1,000 shares held jointly with Mr. Culbreth’s children and 10,328 shares held jointly with his wife, as to which shares Mr. Culbreth may be deemed to share both voting and investment power. Also includes 8,712 shares held in the Bank’s Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan for which receipt of such shares has been deferred, and as to which shares Mr. Culbreth has no voting or dispositive power. Also includes 2,142 shares that Mr. Culbreth has the right to acquire by exercising options that are exercisable within 60 days after the Record Date.

(6)Includes 12,859 shares held in the Bank’s Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan for which receipt of such shares has been deferred, and as to which shares Ms. Daum has no voting or dispositive power. Also includes 5,561 shares that Ms. Daum has the right to acquire by exercising options that are exercisable within 60 days after the Record Date.

(7)Includes 4,490 shares held jointly with Mr. Fogal’s wife and 738 shares held by Mr. Fogal’s wife, as to which shares Mr. Fogal may be deemed to share both voting and investment power. Also includes 8,925 shares held in the Bank’s Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan for which receipt of such shares has been deferred, and as to which shares Mr. Fogal has no voting or dispositive power. Also includes 5,561 shares that Mr. Fogal has the right to acquire by exercising options that are exercisable within 60 days after the Record Date.

(8)Includes 8,002 shares held in the Bank’s Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan for which receipt of such shares has been deferred, and as to which shares Ms. Goebel has no voting or dispositive power. Also includes 5,561 shares that Ms. Goebel has the right to acquire by exercising options that are exercisable within 60 days after the Record Date.

(9)Includes 11,660 shares held in IRAs, as to which shares Mr. Goldman shares both voting and investment power with his wife. Also includes 1,200 shares held in a special needs trust of which Mr. Goldman’s wife is trustee, as to which shares Mr. Goldman may be deemed to share voting and investment power and as to which Mr. Goldman disclaims beneficial ownership. Also includes 39,762 shares held in the Bank’s Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan for which receipt of such shares has been deferred, and as to which shares Mr. Goldman has no voting or dispositive power. Also includes 185,561 shares that Mr. Goldman has the right to acquire by exercising options that are exercisable within 60 days after the Record Date.

38

(10)Includes 224,356 shares held by Sherwood Partners, Ltd., a family limited partnership (“Sherwood Partners”), of which Mr. Hudson and his son, Dennis S. Hudson, III, are general partners, and Mr. Hudson and his children are limited partners. Mr. Hudson may be deemed to share voting and investment power with respect to such shares, but disclaims beneficial ownership, except to the extent of his 1.0% interest in Sherwood Partners. Also includes 8,298 shares held in the Bank’s Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan for which receipt of such shares has been deferred, and as to which shares Mr. Hudson has no voting or dispositive power.

(11)Includes 224,356 shares held by Sherwood Partners, of which Mr. Hudson and his father, Dennis S. Hudson, Jr., are general partners. Mr. Hudson may be deemed to share voting and investment power with respect to such shares with the other general partners, but disclaims beneficial ownership, except to the extent of his 35.0% interest in Sherwood Partners and his beneficial interest in trusts having a 53.2% interest in Sherwood Partners. Also includes 49,386 shares held jointly with Mr. Hudson’s wife which were pledged as security for a margin loan, as to which shares Mr. Hudson may be deemed to share voting and investment power. Also includes 30,866 shares held in the Company’s Retirement Savings Plan, and 55,743 shares that Mr. Hudson has the right to acquire by exercising options that are exercisable within 60 days after the Record Date. Also includes 280 shares held by Mr. Hudson’s wife as custodian and 20 shares held by his son, as to which shares Mr. Hudson may be deemed to share both voting and investment power and as to which Mr. Hudson disclaims beneficial ownership.

(12)Includes 1,175 shares held in the Bank’s Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan for which receipt of such shares has been deferred, and as to which shares Mr. Huval has no voting or dispositive power.

(13)Includes 3,258 shares held in the Bank’s Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan for which receipt of such shares has been deferred, and as to which shares Mr. Lurie has no voting or dispositive power.

(14)Includes 200 shares held by Mr. Rossin’s wife, as to which shares Mr. Rossin may be deemed to share both voting and investment power and as to which Mr. Rossin disclaims beneficial ownership. Also includes 8,298 shares held in the Bank’s Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan for which receipt of such shares has been deferred, and as to which shares Mr. Rossin has no voting or dispositive power.

(15)Includes 23,808 shares that Mr. Cross has the right to acquire by exercising options that are exercisable within 60 days after the Record Date.

(16)Includes 16,855 shares held jointly with Mr. Fowle’s wife, as to which shares Mr. Fowle may be deemed to share both voting and investment power. Also includes 490 shares held in the Company’s Retirement Savings Plan, and 895 shares that Mr. Fowle has the right to acquire by exercising options that are exercisable within 60 days after the Record Date.

(17)Includes 22,760 shares that Mr. Houdeshell has the right to acquire by exercising options that are exercisable within 60 days after the Record Date.

39

(18)Includes 1,571 shares held jointly with Mr. Shaffer’s wife, as to which shares Mr. Shaffer may be deemed to share both voting and investment power. Includes 797 shares held in the Company’s Retirement Savings Plan and 1,577 shares held in the Company’s Employee Stock Purchase Plan. Also includes 22,868 shares that Mr. Shaffer has the right to acquire by exercising options that are exercisable within 60 days after the Record Date.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS

Executive Summary

2016 Performance Considerations

The attainment of adjusted EPS1 of $1.00 set the stage for the CGC’s qualitative assessment of management’s performance and the resulting pay actions for 2016. The assessment process included scorecards that identified shared and individual goals for the year. The CGC relied on scorecards for each of our NEOs as performance guidelines in arriving at pay decisions for our named executive officers during 2013, as well as our compensation objectives and policies,(“NEOs”) in 2016. Based on the material elementsCGC’s assessment of our compensation program,adjusted EPS1 performance and in the material factors considered in setting executive compensation. Our named executive officers for 2013 are listed below:areas of operations, technology, innovation, risk, talent, and business transformation, our NEO’s received a rating of “exceeds” expectations.

2016 NEO PAY

 

·Dennis S. Hudson, III, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and the Bank;Cumulative base salaries for our NEOs increased year-over-year by 4%.

 

·William R. Hahl, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company and the Bank;Cumulative bonus equivalent cash values for our NEOs increased year-over-year by 44%.

 

·David Houdeshell, Executive Vice PresidentOur NEOs, other than our CEO, received awards of Performance-contingent Restricted Stock Units (“PRSUs”) in April 2017 for performance in 2016. These awards were issued in lieu of cash bonuses and Chief Credit Officerwill be earned over three years upon the satisfaction of service and risk conditions. Proxy rules require disclosure of PRSU award values in the Company and the Bank;2018 Summary Compensation Table.

  

·Maria G. Frias, Executive Vice President and Chief Risk OfficerOur CEO received a performance-based equity award in April 2017 for performance in 2016. The CGC increased the target value of the Company and the Bank; andCEO’s performance-based equity award in lieu of a cash bonus or PRSU award for 2016 performance.

 

·H. Russell Holland, III, former Executive Vice President and Chief Lending OfficerEach continuing NEO received a bonus cash equivalent value that will be used to estimate the value of the Company and the Bank, who served until his resignation effective on July 19, 2013.change-in-control (“CIC”) severance benefits that otherwise would be unfairly reduced for a zero bonus value in an “exceeds” performance year.

The compensation of the named executive officers is presented in the tables and related information and discussed under “Executive Compensation” following this section.

Summary

The following is a brief overview of the information provided in this section.

General

 

·The objectives ofCGC approved changes effective with our compensation2017 equity program arein response to attract and retain talented executives, to align their interests with those of our shareholders and to recognize their individual contributions to the achievement of the Company’senhance and advance incentive governance and the Bank’s performance objectives, while discouraging unnecessary or excessivesensitivity between incentives and risk.

 

·Our goalAs a group, the year-over-year change in 2016 NEO Total Direct Compensation (“TDC”), representing base salary and the target award values of performance-based equity granted in February 2016, and as disclosed in our 2016 Summary Compensation Table, declined by 17%. The negative trajectory in 2016 NEO TDC is to be competitive with our total direct compensation, using industry data to benchmark compensation.solely a function of proxy disclosure rules rather than the CGC’s assessment of NEO performance.

 

·1In 2013, compensation for our executives included:Non-GAAP measure; refer to Appendix A - Informtion Regarding Non-GAAP Financial Measures.

  

-40base salary;

 

 

-41stock options;

 

-performance-vesting restricted stock units;

-benefits that include the same group health and welfare benefit programs and tax-qualified retirement plans available to all of our employees, in addition to a non-qualified deferred compensation plan and supplemental executive life and disability coverage; and

-limited executive perquisites.

·Messrs. Hudson and Hahl (and before his resignation, Mr. Holland) each have an employment and/or change in control agreement that provides severance pay if the executive’s employment is terminated in certain circumstances.

2013 Compensation

 

In early 2013, the Committee decided not to increase the base salaries of CEO Dennis S. Hudson, III or CFO William R. Hahl. However, the Committee did approve base salary increases for Ms. FriasOur Executive Compensation Design Priorities and Mr. Houdeshell.Prohibitions

 

The Committee did notCGC is committed to make any short-term cashestablishing and maintaining an executive compensation philosophy that allows us to attain our business and talent objectives, is transparent, reflects a high standard of corporate governance, ensures that our incentive awardsprograms are sensitive to anyrisk, and above all else, promotes and protects the interests of our shareholders. The CGC accomplishes these objectives by continuously assessing our executive compensation program and adhering to the Company’s executive officers in 2013 based on the Company’s 2013 earnings projections. After careful considerationfollowing set of various equity compensation alternatives, the Committee granted time-vesting stock optionsDesign Priorities and performance-vesting restricted stock units in June 2013. The stock options vest in annual installments over a five year period, and the restricted stock units are variable, based on the achievement of goals relating to after tax earnings and classified assets over a period of two and one-half years (through 2015), and vest in annual installments over a period of five years after the end of the performance period. The Committee decided not to grant any short-term equity incentive awards in 2013.Prohibitions.

 

Governance and Evolving Compensation Practices

The Committee and Company management are mindful of evolving practices in executive compensation and corporate governance. In response, we have adopted certain policies and practices that are in keeping with “best practices” in many areas. For example:

Design Priorities (what we do)
·
We do not provide excessive✓    Manage our executive perquisites or extraordinary relocation benefitscompensation programs to have a strong pay-for-performance orientation
    Fully link participation in and settlement of performance-based incentive awards to the attainment of enterprise-wide and individual performance goals.
✓    Emphasize long-term stock-based awards in our executive compensation and total incentive strategies, typically representing 65% to 75% of the total incentive value we provide to our namedexecutives.
✓    Set meaningful performance goals that align management with shareholder interests. Ensure that incentives are sensitive to risk considerations.
✓    Provide minimal executive officers.benefits and perquisites.
·Our 2013 Incentive Plan has “double-trigger” vesting for equity awards in the context    Maintain executive stock ownership requirements, post-settlement holding periods or mandatory deferral of a change in control if the awards are assumedperformance-based awards.
    Prohibit hedging and limit pledging of our common shares by the acquiring company.

·Our 2013 Incentive Plan expressly prohibits repricing of options (directly or indirectly) without prior shareholder approval.

·The Committee engages an independent compensation consultant.

·Company policy prohibitsour directors and executive officers from engaging
    Provide reasonable executive post-employment and change-in-control protections.
    Discuss our CEO’s pay and performance in hedging activities involving Company stock.

·Company policy requires the recoveryexecutive sessions in which our CEO does not participate. Require “clawback” of certain incentive-based compensation paid to current or former executive officers in the event of an accounting restatement.
    Engages with shareholders on their concerns or priorities for our director and executive compensation programs.

Design Prohibitions (what we don’t do)

    No issuance of time-based restricted stock to executives except in connection with offers of employment, individual retention or recognition programs, or as considered by the CGC on a case-by-case basis.

    No repricing of underwater stock options without shareholder approval.

    No incentives that encourage improper risk taking.

    No excise tax gross-ups upon a change in control.

    No single trigger accelerated lapse of restrictions on unvested equity in connection with a change-in-control for new awards granted since 2014.

 

42

Summary of Compensation PhilosophyDecisions in 2016

For planning purposes, the CGC focuses on the sum of base salary paid during the performance year and Objectivesthe values it considers and approves for cash bonus value and the new performance-based equity award earned for the performance year but approved in a subsequent year. We refer to this planning value as Total Direct Compensation or “TDC”. TDC provides a different perspective on pay than is provided by SCTP, which reflects the values shown in the summary compensation table less all other compensation. The CGC considered TDC in its decision process when determining the value of the total incentive award value to approve in 2017 for 2016 performance.

 

The concentrationfollowing chart illustrates the relative emphasis of wealth oneach pay element in relation to TDC, as disclosed in our 2016 Summary Compensation Table (“SCT”). Base salary represents the southeast coastsole component of Florida makes the areaTDC that is not “at risk” for performance. The percentage of TDC “at risk” would have increased in which the Company operates onerelation to fixed pay if our NEO’s received cash bonuses for 2016 performance rather than PRSUs.

2016 NEO Mix of the most attractive regions in Florida for banks to operate and therefore a highly competitive employment market. The Company competes for talent with large national and regional bank franchises who seek local executive and production personnel, and with small local bank franchises who seek executive level talent.Total Direct Compensation

 

 

In ordergeneral, the CGC typically structures NEO pay so that at least one-half of TDC is structured as “at risk” incentive pay. The incentive pay portion of TDC is allocated to operatecash bonus and performance-based equity using target weightings of 25% to 35% and 65% to 75%, respectively. The value allocated to performance-based equity is further allocated into PSUs and options using target weightings of 65% and 35%, respectively. The CGC relies on this structure to ensure that both short-term and long-term incentive awards are fully reflective of performance for the year in which cash bonuses are earned and new target award values are determined and that performance-based equity serves as our primary form of incentive compensation. For 2016, the weightings used to allocate total incentive award values represented a departure from this highly competitive market, the Company has implemented a complex business modelphilosophy given that requires bankers who can leverage the best strategies100% of both largeeach NEO’s total incentive was granted as performance-contingent and small banking institutions. Specifically, the Company’s size allows it to competeor performance-based equity for larger commercial relationships, supported by a complete product offering which includes trust, investment services, private banking and specialty financing, in addition to more common consumer and business banking services. However, to compete with smaller community banks in its markets, the Company also maintains a relationship banking focus on both consumer and commercial business customer needs. We believe this dual strategy requires an organizational culture driven by the value systems of its employees—where disciplines such as taking high levels of personal responsibility, creating effective relationships and providing superior customer service, ultimately drive profitability.2016 performance.

43

  

The Company strives to satisfy the demandsCGC approved PRSU awards in lieu of its business model by rewarding executive officers bothcash bonuses for the successful implementation of Company corporate objectives and2016 performance for individual performance. The Company considers a full range of compensation elements in order to compare favorably with its peers as it seeks to attract and retain key personnel.

In designing the compensation program for executive officers, the Committee seeks to achieve the following key objectives:three reasons:

 

·increase the level of Seacoast stock ownership among our NEOs in response to shareholder concerns

·reinforce the holding power (retention) of our equity compensation program during a critical time in our corporate history, and

·maintain and reinforce the sensitivity between incentives and risk for those most accountable for our success and the safety and soundness of the Company.

PRSU target award values were developed for each of our continuing NEOs using the total incentive methodology described previously. This effort was led by our CEO, who is responsible for developing pay proposals for the management team, which are then presented to the CGC for consideration. The first step in the process involved the CEO’s assessment of each recipient’s performance, as defined by their contributions in helping Seacoast attain the goal of adjusted EPS1 of $1.00 and in terms of individual goals defined on their scorecards.

Our CEO then developed total incentive compensation proposals for each of our continuing NEOs, relying on input from the CGC and to a lesser extent our Chief Human Resources Officer. In developing pay proposals for the NEOs, our CEO considered a number of factors, including: performance; the target value of past total incentive awards; the potential of each executive; flight risk and succession readiness; the holding power (retention) of prior equity awards, including performance-based equity awards granted in April 2017; relative internal value considerations; and market competitiveness. The total incentive values were then allocated to a bonus equivalent cash value and the target award values of performance-based equity.

Bonus equivalent cash values were converted into target PRSU values using an equity value adjustment factor of 1.4. The CEO and the CGC, with input from its consultant, relied on the equity adjustment factor to balance the different risk profiles of unrestricted cash and a restricted stock-settled award subject to service and risk conditions over a multi-year vesting period. The CEO, working in concert with the CGC, evaluated equity value adjustment factors from 1.2 to 1.5 times the bonus equivalent cash value. Based on input from the CEO and the CGC’s consultant, the CGC approved an equity value adjustment factor of 1.4 and an equity structure featuring three-year ratable vesting conditions tied to continuing service and Seacoast’s ongoing compliance with its Tier 1 Regulatory Capital requirement.

The following table summarizes the CGC’s actions in regards to 2016 bonus cash equivalent values, how it compared to 2015 cash bonuses, and the target value of PRSU awards issued in April 2017 for 2016 performance.

1 Non-GAAP measure; refer to Appendix A - Informtion Regarding Non-GAAP Financial Measures.

44

Cash Equivalent Bonus Values & Target PRSU Award Values for 2016

Named Executive Officer 2015 Cash
 Bonus (a)
  2016 Bonus
Equivalent
 Cash (b)
  % Change
(c = b / a - 1)
  2016 Target PRSU
Award Value
(d = c x 1.4)(1)
 
Dennis S. Hudson, III $100,000  $140,000   40%  0(2)
Charles K. Cross, Jr. $125,000  $150,000   20% $210,000 
David D. Houdeshell $75,000  $100,000   33% $140,000 
Charles M. Shaffer $100,000  $185,000   85% $259,000 
NEOs as a Group          44%    

(1)The 2016 Target PRSU Award Values reflects the planning values approved by the CGC, which will differ from the accounting values disclosed in next year’s Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Plan-based Awards Table pursuant to the proxy disclosure rules.

(2)Our CEO did not receive a PRSU award. Instead, the CGC increased the target value of the performance-based equity award he received in April 2017.

The remaining portion of each NEO’s total incentive award was granted as performance-based equity awards in April 2017 for 2016 performance. Seacoast will disclose details of these awards in next year’s proxy statement. The CGC applied the same methodology as used by our CEO to determine the target value of his performance-based equity award granted in April 2017 for 2016 performance.

Base Salary.All of our named-executive officers receive a base salary that appropriately reflectsthe CGC’s assessment of NEO’s skills and value to Seacoast. This process generally results in base salaries that are within a competitive market range. The CGC reviews base salaries annually. It is the CGC’s philosophy to increase base salaries in response to increases in the size, scope or complexity of an executive’s job, in connection with a promotion or other forms of recognition that appropriately reflect value considerations, or to maintain the desired level of internal relative value. 2016 annualized base salary actions for our named executive officers are summarized in the following table.

2016 Annualized Base Salary Actions

Named Executive Officer 2015  2016  % Change 
Dennis S. Hudson, III $550,000  $550,000   0%
Steven A. Fowle $330,000  $330,000   0%
Charles K. Cross, Jr. $275,000  $300,000   9%
David D. Houdeshell $265,000  $265,000   0%
Charles M. Shaffer $250,000  $300,000   20%
NEOs as a Group          4%

45

Mr. Cross and Mr. Shaffer received base salary adjustments in 2016 given the impact of their respective businesses on our performance, organic growth and the expansion of their businesses in response to recent acquisitions, their leadership, and the maturation of our executive compensation philosophy and the underlying strategies.

2016 Total Incentives.The following table identifies the various forms of incentive compensationthat the CGC approved for our NEOs during 2016 or in connection with 2016 performance, excluding the target value of performance-based equity granted in April 2017 that will be disclosed in our 2018 proxy statement.

Named Executive
Officer
 Cash
Bonus
(a)
  Target Value of
PSUs granted
 in Feb 2016 (b)
  Target Value of
Options granted
in Feb. 2016 (c)
  Target Value of
PRSUs granted in
Apr. 2017 (d)
  Cumulative 2016
Total Incentive
Value (e=a+b+c+d)
 
Dennis S. Hudson, III $0  $357,489  $175,881  $0  $533,370 
Steven A. Fowle $0  $97,486  $47,968  $0  $145,454 
Charles K. Cross, Jr. $0  $168,992  $83,144  $210,000  $462,136 
David D. Houdeshell $0  $90,995  $44,769  $140,000  $275,764 
Charles M. Shaffer $0  $146,244  $71,952  $259,000  $477,196 

Equity Awards

Seacoast’s equity strategy has continued to evolve since the financial crisis. For each of the past three years, the CGC took action to accelerate the acquisition of our stock by our senior leadership team and other key contributors across the Company upon the attainment of performance and risk-based goals. These actions increased the alignment of equity recipients with shareholder interests, revitalized our retention strategies, and elevated our visibility and appeal as an employer of choice for highly skilled talent. The following tables summarize the evolution and emphasis of our equity strategies since 2014.

Evolution of Seacoast’s Performance-based Equity Strategies, 2013-2016

Grant CycleType of
 Equity
Performance Period /
 Payout Range /
Option Vesting Period
Performance
Objective(s)
2013 (Jun)PSUs

· 3-year Performance Period

· Payout as % of Target: 0-150%

· Cumulative Earnings
Options· 3-year ratable vesting· Stock Price Appreciation
2015 (Jan)PSUs

· 4-year Performance Period with catch-up

· Payout as % of Target: 0-150%

· Cumulative Earnings

· Return

· Tier 1 Capital Compliance

Options· 4-year monthly vesting, starting when stock price closes above exercise price by 120%

· Stock Price Appreciation

· Tier 1 Capital Compliance

2016 (Feb)PSUs

· 4-year Performance Period with catch-up

· Payout as % of Target 0-175%

· Cumulative Earnings

· Return

· Tier 1 Capital Compliance

Options· 4-year monthly vesting, starting when stock price closes above exercise price of 120%

· Stock Price Appreciation

· Tier 1 Capital Compliance


46

In 2016, the CGC approved two forms of stock-based long-term incentive awards in connection with Seacoast’s incentive compensation strategy for our named executives. Collectively, we refer to each award type as “performance-based equity.”

2016 Performance Stock Unit (“PSU”) Awards

2016 PSUs represent stock-settled incentive awards where payout can vary from 0% to 175% of the target number of shares granted based on our cumulative four-year earnings and average return on average tangible common equity. For each of the past two award cycles, the CC approved cumulative earnings goals that require escalating levels of double digit growth at threshold, goal and maximum performance levels. The CGC also approved a return on tangible common equity goal that is set above our cost of capital for 2016. The return goal will modify the performance score that is generated by our cumulative earnings by up to +/- 25%, resulting in a long-term incentive opportunity that reflects earnings and return. The CGC selected earnings and return as metrics for our PSU program given the influence they exert on stock price over sustained periods of time. PSU awards also include a “catch-up” provision that allows for a reduced payout after the end of year four if our year five performance equals or exceeds the original four-year goal. This feature reduces the motivation for our executives to take excessive or inappropriate risks by extending the performance period during slower economic periods that could adversely affect our growth expectations and our ability to retain our executives.

2016 Performance Stock Options (“Options”)

Options allow recipients to purchase shares of our common stock in the future at a predetermined price. In order to ensure that our shareholders receive an appropriate return before management can exercise its vested stock options, the awards are issued with a stock price performance hurdle equal to 120% of the grant date closing price of the underlying shares. Once the stock price hurdle is attained for a specified number of days, restrictions start to lapse on stock options at a rate of 1/48 per month for four years. As is the case with PSUs, the CGC relies on an extended vesting period to provide holding power. The CGC relies on Options to reward management for value creation, which is of paramount importance to our shareholders. We issue Options to our executives given the simplicity and transparency of this type of award structure. In recognition that Options could be perceived as motivating the recipient to take excessive risks, the CGC manages the target value of the awards so that they represent significantly less award opportunity than might be realized from PSU awards.

Other Considerations Involving 2016 Equity Awards

As is the case with PRSUs, employees must meet service, performance or market, and a risked-based condition (e.g., Tier 1 Regulatory Capital) in order to receive their performance-based equity awards. The CGC relies on compliance with our Tier 1 Regulatory Capital requirement since it relates our equity capital to our total risk weighted assets, determining our level of capital adequacy. Our NEOs are also subject to stock ownership requirements and holding periods in connection with stock-settled incentive awards. In addition, we will be introducing a mandatory deferral on PSUs starting with the 2017 grant cycle.

47

Time-Based Restricted Stock Units

Given our strong pay-for-performance orientation, we typically limit the use of time-based restricted stock awards for our top executives to offers of employment, to enhance holding power (retention) of our stock incentive strategy, or in special situations that are evaluated on a case-by-case basis at the discretion of the CGC.

Overview of Executive Compensation

Compensation Philosophy and Objectives

Our Board of directors views equity compensation as the foundation of our performance, talent and incentive strategies. We rely on equity compensation to motivate recipients to create significant wealth for themselves and our shareholders. Our stock price performance over the past few years has reinforced the attractiveness of equity compensation to our associates, as evidenced by the number of our executives and middle managers who elected to receive PRSUs in lieu of all or in connection with reduced cash bonuses for 2016 performance. Associate participation levels also are increasing in our Employee Stock Purchase Plan. Seacoast provides multiple paths to associate stock ownership. All of these paths lead to higher engagement scores and a unique and differentiating associate and customer experience. The CGC intends to continue to rely on significant performance-based stock awards for our CEO, NEOs and other key associates given the benefits of executive and associate stock ownership for our shareholders.

In terms of the broader aspects of our executive compensation program, we consider: 1) the alignment of our compensation program with the long-term interests of our shareholders, 2) the desire to structure pay in ways that promotes the evolution of our business strategy in response to emerging opportunities and customer demand for innovative products and services, and 3) the relationship between risk-taking and incentive compensation provided to our executives.

Specific Objectives of our executive compensation program include:

·Attract and Retain Talented Executives. The compensation program should provide each executive officer with a total compensation opportunity that is market competitive. This objective is intended to ensure that there are highly competent leaders in the organization, while maintaining an appropriate cost structure for the Company.

 

·Alignment with Shareholders. The compensation program should align executives’ interests with those of the Company’s shareholders, promoting actions that will have a long-term positive impact on total shareholder returns.Establish clear and enterprise-wide expectations for growth, return and risk management

 

·Recognize Individual Contributions. The compensation program should reward executive officers for individual contributions to the success of the Company’s operating performance. The Committee believes that over time the achievement of the Company’s performance objectives is the primary determinant of share price.Alignment with Shareholders

·Recognize Individual Contributions

·Encourage Entrepreneurial Thinking

·Discourage Taking Excessive Risk. The compensation program should limit any features that could lead to the senior executive officers taking unnecessary or excessive risks that could threaten the value of the Company.

 

In the second half of 2012, when the Company was no longer restricted by its participation in the CPP, the Committee decidedOur business and talent strategies dictate that we seek to develop a new incentive program for those individualshire and retain entrepreneurial-minded executives who are focused on value creation, share our values and commitment to effective risk management, and possess the skills required to support our business strategies and to attain our goals and objectives. Our goals are to motivate and reward high performance levels, as well as enhance morale and associate engagement in positionsorder to meaningfully impact the Company’s bottom line goals. In August 2012, the Committee engaged Grant Thornton, a nationally known independent consulting firm, to conduct a review of compensation of the Company’s executive officers, which is described under “Role of thedrive superior customer service within our defined risk parameters.

48

Determining Executive Compensation Consultant” below. The information obtained from the study was used by the Committee to develop the incentive compensation program for executive officers for 2013.

 

Determining Executive Compensation

Role of the CommitteeCGC

The CommitteeCGC is responsible for establishing our compensation philosophy and for overseeing our executive compensation policies and programs generally. As part of this responsibility, the Committee:CGC:

·regularly interacts with our executives in order to make informed decisions on performance, potential, developmental needs and their value to Seacoast;

 

·approves our executive compensation programs, including grantsconstruction of our peer group, issuance of equity awards;awards, and certification of results;

 

·evaluates the performance of the CEO and determines the CEO’s compensation; and

·reviews the performance of other members of executive management and approves their compensation based on recommendations made by the CEO.CEO; and

·assesses our incentive strategies from a risk perspective, ensuring that earnings opportunities strike the right balance between risk and reward and that our executives are not motivated to take excessive risks.

 

The CommitteeCGC reviews executive officer compensation to ensure that such compensation supports the business and talent needs of our business and is consistentfully aligned with our compensation philosophies, Company and personal performance, changes in market practices and changes in individual responsibilities.

Role and Independence of the Compensation Consultant

 

From timeThe CGC endeavors to time,adhere to effective governance practices and principles. As such, our Committee is comprised solely of independent directors. The CGC pursuant to its Charter oversees executive compensation and talented-related considerations, such as succession planning, and our efforts in creating a diverse and inclusive high performance workforce capable of feeding our leadership needs across the Committee has engaged independent compensation consultants and advisors. In general, these consultants and advisors have provided compensation benchmarking and analytical data and have rendered advice to the Committee regarding all aspects of the Committee’s compensation decisions.Company. The Committee has direct access to consultants and control over their engagement.

In August 2012, themet eight times in 2016. The Committee engagedretained Grant Thornton in 2015 and 2016 to conduct a review of the compensation of the Company’s executive officers in comparison to a peer group of banks which was selected byserve as its independent consultant. Grant Thornton attended CGC meetings, including executive sessions, and approved byprovided information and advice independent of management and, at the Committee.direction of CGC Chairperson, assisted management with various activities that support Seacoast’s executive compensation program. Grant Thornton was also engaged to provide assistance with development of a short-term incentive compensation plan and a long-term equity-based incentive plan for executive officers and key managers, and to conduct a review of compensation paid to directors. In 2012, the firm was paid a total of $85,245 for such services with the Committee and did not provide any services directly to the Company or to management. Grant Thornton’s work on the design and implementation of the new compensation plan continued in 2013. In 2013, the firm was paid a total of $20,790 for such services with the Committee and did not provide any services directly to the Company or to management.

In August 2012, and again in March 2014, the Committee evaluated the independence of Grant Thornton in light of SEC rules and Nasdaq listing standards, which require consideration of the following factors:

whether any other services are provided to the Company by the consultant;

the fees paid by the Company as a percentage of the consulting firm’s total revenue;

the policies or procedures maintained by the consulting firm that are designed to prevent a conflict of interest;
any business or personal relationships between the individual consultants involved in the engagement and a member of the Committee;

any company stock owned by the individual consultants involved in the engagement; and

any business or personal relationships between our executive officers and the consulting firm or the individual consultants involved in the engagement.

Seacoast. The CommitteeCGC discussed these considerations pursuant to SEC and NASDAQ rules and concluded that the engagement of Grant Thornton and the services it provided to the Committee by Grant Thornton did not raise any conflict of interest.

  

49

Benchmarking and Comparator Group

 

Grant Thornton’s 2012 reviewThe CGC relies on market pay data and related research to inform its decision on the construction and expected outcomes of our director and executive compensation included a comparison of salary, bonus and other forms of compensation, including stock based compensation, for aprograms. In considering peer group construction, the CGC recognizes that Seacoast competes for executive talent against a wide variety of 20 publicly held regional banksfinancial services organizations and companies in other industries that were identifiedrely on or want to acquire the skill sets that our executives offer. As a result, the CGC relies substantially on information developed from a size-appropriate, high-performing core bank industry compensation peer group in its decision process. It also considers, to a lesser extent, the pay strategies employed by Grant Thornton as being comparable tolarge, most admired or innovative financial services companies, and high-performing customer service and technology companies. In terms of assessing the Company in size and geography. The asset sizeeffect of the CGC’s decisions on how we position pay vis-à-vis market, we rely exclusively on pay and performance data developed using our core bank industry compensation peer group ranged between $1.5 billion and $2.9 billion, with an average asset size of $2.4 billion, based on dataor, as needed, from the most recent fiscal quarter-end available at the time of the study. While theMcLagan Regional Bank Survey.

The 2016 peer group was primarily based on asset size and geography, Grant Thornton also consideredis unchanged from the peer bank’s business model, financial performance and future company focus. Given the dramatic changes in the banking landscape in the last few years and the limited number of banks of Seacoast’s size remaining in Florida, the study included two Florida-headquartered banks and other banks in the Southeastern U.S. The2015 peer group, also containedexcept that Bridge Capital Holdings, which was acquired by Western Alliance, a combination of banks that had participatedbank with $16.7 billion in the CPP and those not limited by CPP restrictions, as well as banks located in similar but less stressed markets. The peer groupassets, was removed. Our Core Bank Peer Group is now comprised of:

 

1. Ameris Bancorp (ABCB)•  Hampton Roads Bankshares, Inc. (HMPR)11. Horizon Bancorp (HBNC)
2. BNC Bancorp (BNCN)•  Metro Bancorp, Inc. (METR)12. Lakeland Financial (LKFN)
•  Capital City Bank Group, Inc. (CCBG)3. Cardinal Financial (CFNL)•  Newbridge Bancorp (NBBC)13. Mainsource Financial (MSFG)
•  Cardinal Financial Corporation (CFNL)4. City Holdings (CHCO)•  Southeastern Bank Financial Corp. (SBFC.OB)14. Pacific Premier Bancorp (PPBI)
•  CenterState Banks, Inc. (CSFL)5. Eagle Bancorp (EGBN)•  Southern Community Financial Corp (SCMF)15. Renasant Corp. (RNST)
•  City Holding Company (CHCO)6. Enterprise Financial (EFSC)•  State Bank Financial Corp. (STBZ)
•  Eagle Bancorp Inc. (EGBN)•  Stellarone Corp. (STEL)
•  Fidelity Southern Corporation (LION)16. Sterling Bancorp (STL)
•  First Community Bancshares, Inc. (FCBC)7. Fidelity Southern (LION)•  Univest Corporation of Pennsylvania (UVSP)17. Stock Yards Bancorp (SYBT)
•  FNB United Corp (FNBN)8. First Long Island Corp. (FLIC)•  Virginia Community18. Tompkins Financial (TMP)
9. German American Bancorp Inc. (VCBI)(GABC)19. Washington TR Bancorp (WASH)
10. Great Southern Bancorp (GSBC)

 

The previousCGC does not identify a specific target level or percentile of base salary, incentive cash, or the target value of stock-based awards for our named executive officers. Instead, pay outcomes, which include the target value of stock awards to be earned for future performance, initially are determined by internal performance and talent considerations. The CGC then compares its initial thinking on NEO pay actions against market pay levels. Market assessments serve as key points of reference and validation in the CGC’s process. Ensuring that are pay is appropriate positioned appropriately vis-à-vis those organization against which we compete for talent, customers, and investors. Pay for our NEOs always will be sensitive to performance and risk considerations. The CGC expects that for performance reasons NEO pay over-time will fluctuate within an appropriate range of market pay levels.

50

Executive Compensation Framework Highlights

StructureReasoning
PEER GROUP:
A core peer group of banks of similar size, business model and financial performance, and, for a secondary reference, select companies beyond the banking industry.Our business model requires us to compete with these groups for executive talent in order to achieve our business objectives related to growth, innovation and profitability.

BASE SALARY, TOTAL INCENTIVE & TDC:

·     No specific target level or percentile of pay relative to comparable positions

·     Pay decisions reflect the performance of the Company and each executive in relation to prior year pay and performance, planning considerations, and pay relationship to market pay levels and pay practices of  peer group

·     Competitiveness will vary based on performance in terms of the calibration of total incentive awards and amounts ultimately earned from our long-term stock incentive program

·      Improve pay for performance linkage

·      Align pay with overall value of each individual to Seacoast

CASH BONUS:
Performance scorecards serve as the basis for cash bonuses and the target value of performance-based long-term incentive/equity awardsEstablish clear expectations for individual goals as well as link with enterprise-wide growth, return and risk management objectives
EQUITY:

·     Simple, performance-based, shareholder-friendly structure with 2 components, PSUs and stock options, both with a long-term emphasis, but weighted more heavily with PSUs

·      Meaningful stock-based award opportunities “right-sized” for company and individual performance considerations and needs

·      Approximately 50% or more of TDC for our named executive officers delivered as performance-based pay.

·     Annual award cycles

·     4-year PSU performance period, with an opportunity for reduced awards after five years

·     Risk considerations serve as an additional vesting requirement on both PSUs and Performance Options

·      PSUs allow for upside in underlying shares, providing direct linkage between potential award payouts and management’s success at driving earnings growth and improving returns without inappropriate risk taking

·      Performance Options first require that shareholders receive a meaningful return before option begins to vest

·     Provide more compensation contingent upon achievement of performance goals or our stock’s performance

·      Aligns more closely with the shareholder interests

·      Continuously recalibrate performance expectations and promote consistent improvement

·      Enhance retention of management team

·      Enhance long-term performance accountability

·      Improves retention

·      Augment alignment with shareholder interests

·      Provide executives with an economic incentive to deliver sustainable results within a risk appropriate framework

51

Please note that 2016 was the first year in which the CGC relied on PRSU awards to motivate and retain our NEOs. For this reason, PRSUs are not identified or discussed in the preceding table.

2016 Executive Compensation Actions

Each year the CEO makes a qualitative assessment of NEO performance and the CGC makes a qualitative assessment of CEO performance. The assessment process relies on scorecards that are approved at the start of each year, establishing performance guidelines against which results are compared at the end of the year. Performance ratings are then developed for each NEO, which are used to inform the CGC’s decision regarding pay actions for the corresponding year’s performance. Despite refinements to various aspects of our executive compensation philosophy and the underlying strategies for 2016, the performance assessment process did not change.

The CGC and our CEO rely on qualitative assessments of the performance of our NEOs and other members of senior management team given our accelerated growth, the rapid evolution of business, and the changing demands on our executives. The CGC believes that qualitative assessments of NEO performance for the purpose of compensation, development and advancement continue to serve the best interests of our shareholders.

The culmination of the CGC’s activities in regards to CEO and NEO performance and pay are reflected in the following tables.

 

52

Compensation Paid to Chief Executive Officer in 2016

Dennis. S. Hudson, III, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer

Key Influences in the CGC’s Decision Process2016 Pay Outcomes

·      Achievement of adjusted EPS1goal of $1.00 for FY16; leading contributor to our efforts to attain this goal to the benefit of our shareholders

·      Adjusted net income1 of $37.5 million compared to $25.3 million in 2015

·      Adjusted return on tangible common equity1for 4Q16 of 13.1%, representing a 480 basis point improvement from 4Q15 of 8.3%

·      Enhanced executive talent and performance management system to drive improved accountability and performance by executive management

·      Strong credit quality and appropriate risk management

·      No major risk operational risk failures and significant upgrades and oversight in our risk management capabilities, across the Company in general and in regards to compensation and retail sales related risks in particular

·      Successful integration of Floridian and Orlando BMO franchises

·      Attainment of growth and strategic initiatives measured by household growth, accretive acquisitions, increased percentages of new accounts and loans originated through alternative channels, and a lower fixed cost structure

·      Implementation of plan to improve operating leverage and customer experience via channel optimization

·      Associate engagement and enterprise-wide alignment with the business strategy

·      Heightened community and investor outreach and engagement

·      No Base Salary Increase

·      Replaced Bonus by increasing the target value of the Performance-based Equity award granted in April 2017 for 2016 performance as compared to 2015 Bonus of $100,000

·      Performance-based equity (PSU granted in 2016) valued at $357,489 compared to $454,049 in 2015

·      Performance Option valued at $175,881 compared to $39,773 in 2015

·      All Other Compensation of $33,530

·      Bonus equivalent cash value of $140,000 to be used as an input in our CIC calculations.

1 Non-GAAP measure; refer to Appendix A - Informtion Regarding Non-GAAP Financial Measures.

53

Compensation Paid to Our Other Named Executive Officers in 2016

Charles K. Cross, Jr., Executive Vice President, Commercial Banking

Key Influences in the CGC’s Decision Process2016 Pay Outcomes

·      Achievement of adjusted EPS1 goal of $1.00 for FY16

·      Adjusted Net Income1 of $37.5 million compared to $25.3 million in 2015

·      Adjusted return on tangible common equity1for 4Q16 of 13.1%, representing a 480 basis point improvement from 4Q15 of 8.3%

·      No major risk operational risk failures

·      Contributions to enterprise-wide business transformation efforts

·      Line of Business and Specialty Line of Business performance, on average, of 146% of goal

·      Development and successful implementation of business process improvements regarding sales function

·      Development and successful implementation of talent and staffing initiatives

·      Enhanced and advanced customer engagement scores

·      Annualized Base Salary increase to $300,000 effective April 1, 2016 compared to an annualized 2015 Base Salary of $275,000

·      PRSUs with a target award value of $210,000 granted in lieu of a cash bonus compared to a 2015 cash bonus of $125,000

·      Performance-based equity (PSU granted in 2016) valued at $168,992 compared to $249,443 in 2015

·      Performance Option valued at $83,144 compared to $21,850 in 2015

·      All Other Compensation of $23,165

·      Bonus Equivalent Cash Value of $150,000 to be used as an input in our CIC calculations

1 Non-GAAP measure; refer to Appendix A - Informtion Regarding Non-GAAP Financial Measures.

54

David D. Houdeshell, Executive Vice President, Chief Risk Officer

Key Influences in the CGC’s Decision Process2016 Pay Outcomes

·      Achievement of adjusted EPS1 goal of $1.00 for FY16

·      Adjusted Net Income1 of $37.5 million compared to $25.3 million in 2015

·       Adjusted return on tangible common equity1for 4Q16 of 13.1%, representing a 480 basis point improvement from 4Q15 of 8.3%

·      No major risk operational risk failures

·      Contributions to enterprise-wide business transformation efforts

·      Maintained credit quality metrics during a high growth year

·      Successful implementation of Credit Origination System for small business loans

·      Developed and implemented significant enhancements to our enterprise and operational risk capabilities through new programs, systems and performance analytics

·      Effective partnering with other functions in the development and launch of new products and services

·      No Base Salary increase.

·      PRSUs with a target award value of $140,000 granted in lieu of a cash bonus compared to a 2015 cash bonus of $75,000

·      Performance-based equity (PSU granted in 2016) valued at $90,995 compared to $163,559 in 2015

·      Performance Option valued at $44,769 compared to $14,327 in 2015

·      All Other Compensation of $11,141

·      Bonus Equivalent Cash Value of $100,000 to be used as an input in our CIC calculations

1 Non-GAAP measure; refer to Appendix A - Informtion Regarding Non-GAAP Financial Measures.

55

Charles M. Shaffer, Executive Vice President, Community Banking

Key Influences in the CGC’s Decision Process2016 Pay Outcomes

·      Achievement of adjusted EPS1goal of $1.00 for FY16; major contributor to our efforts to attain this goal to the benefit of our shareholders

·      Adjusted Net Income1 of $37.5 million compared to $25.3 million in 2015

·      Adjusted return on tangible common equity1for 4Q16 of 13.1%, representing a 480 basis point improvement from 4Q15 of 8.3%

·      Double digit growth in consumer and small business commitments

·      Successful development and implementation of sales and service transformation strategies

·      Double digit growth in trust revenue and highest year ever in terms of growth in new trust assets

·      Changed the mindset of Community Banking team members to one of a high performing organization that consistently wins in the marketplace by providing a unique and differentiating customer experience

·      Ongoing leadership of and contributions to our business transformation and strategy efforts

·      Annualized Base Salary increase to $300,000 effective April 1, 2016 compared to an annualized 2015 Base Salary of $250,000

·      PRSUs with a target award value of $259,000 granted in lieu of a cash bonus compared to a 2015 cash bonus of $100,000

·      Performance-based equity (PSU granted in 2016) valued at $146,244 compared to $204,606 in 2015

·      Performance Option valued at $71,952 compared to $17,923 in 2015

·      All Other Compensation of $19,901

·      Bonus Equivalent Cash Value of $185,000 to be used as an input in our CIC calculations

Stephen A. Fowle, Executive Vice President, & Chief Financial Officer

The CGC took separate actions for Mr. Fowle given his departure from the Company was selected by Grant Thorntonon March 31, 2017. Details are provided in 2009 during a similar reviewthe section below entitled “Transition Agreement with CFO”.

1 Non-GAAP measure; refer to Appendix A - Informtion Regarding Non-GAAP Financial Measures.

56

Other Elements of the Company’s executive compensation. The peer group above includes many of the same financial institutions used in the 2009 study. Seven financial institutions that either had been closed by the FDIC, had become less than well-capitalized, were located outside the Southeastern U.S., or had become less comparable due to a change in asset size, business model or type of charter were eliminated from the list. Ten banks were added to replace those eliminated and round out the peer group to a total of 20 banks.

Grant Thornton concluded that between 2009 and the 2012 study, total compensation for the Company’s executive officers had declined in comparison to the market. To improve the competitiveness of the Company’s executive compensation package, Grant Thornton recommended the development of a long-term incentive plan designed to provide an opportunity for executives to earn equity compensation over a multi-year performance period based on achievement of specific performance targets.

Overview of2016 Compensation Program for Executive Officers

 

The Company’s executive compensation program historically included short-term incentive compensation through an annual cash incentive plan and long-term equity compensationChange in the form of restricted stock, stock options and/or stock-settled stock appreciation rights. However, the Company did not offer these elements of compensation to executive officers in 2008, 2009 or 2010 due to the Company’s performance and its participation in the CPP. In 2011, when our performance improved, short and long-term incentive compensation was again provided through compensation forms which were permitted for participants in the CPP. After the compensation restrictions under the CPP ended in the first half of 2012, the Committee formulated a new incentive compensation program for executive officers which was partially implemented in 2013.

The new executive compensation program consists of the following elements: 1) base salary, 2) annual cash incentive award, 3) and equity compensation, in three forms, referred to as portfolio stock awards, incentive stock awards and stock options. Each element of the executive compensation program addresses different objectives. Those elements implemented in 2013 are described more fully below under “Elements of the 2013 Compensation Program for Executive Officers”. Base salary represents the fixed portion of each executive’s compensation and is generally targeted at or around the 50th percentile of comparable positions. The annual cash incentive award is another form of cash compensation that is earned based on achieving specific measurable objectives which, when met, result in acceptable overall operating results for the Company. The stock compensation is provided to align the executive’s compensation with growth in shareholder value. Each component of the stock compensation has a different time horizon and performance measure(s) designed to align with specific short-term and long-term goals which support our long-term strategic direction, as reflected below:

Stock Compensation

Component

Time HorizonPerformance GoalsPerformance Measures
Portfolio Stock Grants3 Years

·Control BenefitsProfitability & Growth

·Shareholder Value Creation

·Net Income Growth

·Relative Total Shareholder Returns

Incentive Stock Grants1 Year

·Profitability & Growth

·Shareholder Value Creation

·Strategic Milestones

·Unit Profitability

·Other Financial Measures

·Board Evaluation of milestone goals achieved

Stock Options5-10 Years·Shareholder Value Creation·Stock Price

The new executive compensation program was partially implemented in 2013, with grants of portfolio stock awards (in the form of performance-vesting restricted stock units) and stock options. The Committee expects to implement the remainder of the program, which includes annual cash incentive awards and short-term incentive stock awards, in 2014.

 

Elements of the 2013 Compensation Program for Executive Officers

As describedWe provide change in more detail below, the elements of the Company’s 2013 executive compensation program included:

·base salary;

·stock options;

·performance-vesting restricted stock units, which we refercontrol benefits to as “portfolio stock awards”;

·benefits that include the same group health and welfare benefit programs and tax-qualified retirement plans available to all of our employees, in addition to a non-qualified deferred compensation plan and supplemental executive life and disability coverage; and

·limited executive perquisites.

34

Setting 2013 Total Direct Compensation Opportunities

When setting base salary and target amounts for equity awards, the Committee examined each component of pay on both a stand-alone basis and as a total, as well as over a three-year period assuming target level performance is achieved in all periods and full implementation of all short-term and long-term compensation components described above. Pay decisions were based on the Committee’s business judgment, informed by the comparative data, professional advice and other considerations, including the individual executive’s position, experience and performance, internal pay equity and mastery of position responsibilities.

The table below reflects the targeted percentage of each element of direct compensation for the named executive officers to encourage them to consider the best interests of shareholders by stabilizing any concerns about their own personal financial well-being in 2013, excluding indirect formsthe face of compensation such as health, retirementa potential change in control of the Company. These agreements are described under “Employment and welfare benefitsChange in Control Agreements”, and perquisites.detailed information is provided under “2016 Other Potential Post-Employment Payments.”

 

2013 Target Compensation ElementsIn the event that our NEOs qualify for change-in-control severance benefits, a portion of the payments they might receive are a function of highest paid bonus or average bonus paid for the three-year period preceding the year in which a change-in-control (“CIC”) occurs. While issuing PRSUs in lieu of cash bonuses, or in the case of our CEO increasing the value of his performance-based equity award, creates multiple potential benefits, the CGC recognized that it also disadvantaged our NEOs if a CIC occurs. Specifically, as Percentagenone of Total Compensation

  Base Salary  

Stock Options

Target Value(1)

  

Performance-Vesting

RSUs

Target Value (2)

 
Dennis S. Hudson, III  49%   6%   45% 
William R. Hahl  55%   3%   42% 
Maria G. Frias  61%   2%   37% 
David Houdeshell  55%   3%   42% 
H. Russell Holland, III         


(1)Grant date value, determined using a Black-Scholes analysis. This grant date value is reflected in the Summary Compensation Table and the Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table. The number of options granted is shown in the All Other Option Awards column of the Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table.

(2)Grant date value, assuming achievement of target performance goals. This grant date value is reflected in the Summary Compensation Table and the Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table. The number of RSUs vesting at threshold, target and maximum performance is shown in the Equity Incentive Plan Awards column of the Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table.

Base Salaryour NEOs received a cash bonus for 2016 performance, under the terms of their agreements their highest paid or average bonus paid for the purpose of CIC severance benefits will reflect a zero value for a performance year in which a high value bonus otherwise would have been paid.

 

The base salaryIn response to the unintended negative consequence created by granting PRSUs in lieu of cash bonuses for 2016 performance or in the case of our CEO increasing the target value of his performance-based equity award, the CGC approved the same bonus cash equivalent values that it relied on in determining the value of PRSU awards. An analysis of the impact of a zero cash bonus and the bonus equivalent cash value for each of our executive officers represents the fixed portion of their total compensation. In establishing executive officer base salaries, the Committee has historically considered individual annual performance and contribution to the Company’s overall profitability, as well as the relationship of an executive’s total compensation compared to similar executives in other banks. Information regarding salaries paidcontinuing NEOs appears in the market is obtained annually through publicly available salary surveys and proxy statement data, and is used to evaluate the Company’s competitiveness in the employment market with its peers and competitors. Independent consultants selected by the Committee may also be used periodically to assess the competitiveness of the Company’s salaries. For additional information regarding the determination of the Company’s peer group, see “Determining Executive Compensation – Benchmarking and Comparator Group.”following table.

 

The Company’s general philosophy is to provide base pay competitive with the market, and to reward individual performance while positioning salaries consistent with Company performance. Given our highly competitive employment market in South Florida and the Company’s business strategy, the base salary level for key executives generally is targeted at or around the 50th percentile of comparable positions.

Changes in the base salaries paid to executive officers, including the named executive officers, are recommended by the chief executive officer based on annual performance assessments and are reviewed and approved by the Committee. Performance assessments for base salary adjustments in 2013 were subjective, non-formulaic and were not based upon objective financial criteria. The Committee considers and approves any change in the base salary paid to the chief executive officer after meeting in executive session.Cash Bonus CIC Severance Input Analysis, 2014-2016

 

Per Agreement: D. Hudson  C. Cross  D. Houdeshell  C. Shaffer 
2014 Cash Bonus $0  $80,000  $35,000  $48,100 
2015 Cash Bonus $100,000  $125,000  $75,000  $100,000 
2016 Cash Bonus $0  $0  $0  $0 
CIC Severance Input $100,000  $68,333  $36,667  $49,367 

The Committee met in March 2013

Per CGC Directive: D. Hudson  C. Cross  D. Houdeshell  C. Shaffer 
2016 Cash Equivalent Bonus $140,000  $150,000  $100,000  $185,000 
Modified CIC Severance Input $140,000  $118,333  $70,000  $111,033 

CIC severance benefits attributable to cash bonus for Mr. Hudson reflect the highest value payment he receives during the three-years prior to a transaction. CIC severance benefits attributable to cash bonuses for our other continuing NEOs reflect the value of average cash bonus they receive during the three-years prior to a transaction. A CIC and decided notjob loss must occur within a stated period of time before our executives will be eligible to increase the base salaries of the CEO and the Company’s executive officers for 2013, except for Ms. Frias and Mr. Houdeshell, who received increases.

Stock Optionsreceive CIC severance benefits.

 

57

The Company granted stock options to the executive officers on June 28, 2013. The options vest in annual installments over a five-year period and have a term of ten years. Because stock options provide compensation opportunity upside based solely on the growth in the Company’s share price, the objective of the options is to directly align the Company’s executive compensation program with the achievement of superior long-term shareholder returns.

Portfolio Stock Awards (Performance-Vesting RSUs)

 

The Company also granted performance-vesting restricted stock units (RSUs) on June 28, 2013. We sometimes refer to these awards as the “portfolio stock awards.” These awards have a measurement period of 2½ years (through December 31, 2015), with goals relating to after tax earnings (weighted at 75%) and classified assets (weighted at 25%). Payouts range from 87.5% of the target amount at threshold performance to 151% of the target amount at maximum performance. Achievement of the threshold goal for both measures is required for any of the awards to become eligible to vest. The number of shares that become eligible to vest are based on these performance factors and will then vest in equal annual installments over a three-year period following the performance period. These awards are designed to focus the executives on the Company’s earnings and asset quality while investing in long-term growth initiatives and provide retention value during the vesting period.

Retirement and Employee Welfare Benefits

 

The Company sponsorsWe sponsor a retirement savings plan for employees of the Company and its affiliates (the “Retirement Savings Plan”) and a nonqualified deferred compensation plan for certain executive officers (the “Executive Deferred Compensation Plan”). We offer these plans, and make contributions to them, to provide employees with tax-advantaged savings vehicles and to encourage them to save money for their retirement.

 

The Retirement Savings Plan is a tax-qualified defined contribution plan. All employees who satisfy service eligibility requirements may participate in the plan. The Retirement Savings Plan has various features, including:

·an employer matching contribution for salary deferrals,

·an annual retirement contribution, and

·a profit sharing contribution.

In addition, the Retirement Savings Plan has a feature under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”) that allows employees to make voluntary “salary savings contributions” ranging from one percent to 75 percent of compensation (as defined by the Retirement Savings Plan), subject to federal income tax limitations. After-tax contributions may also be made by employees through “voluntary contributions” (as defined in the Retirement Savings Plan for each plan year) subject to certain statutory limitations. A retirement contribution is made on an annual discretionary basis by the Company of up to two percent of “retirement eligible compensation,” as defined in the Retirement Savings Plan. The Company contributions to the Retirement Savings Plan vest at the rate of 25 percent for each year the participant has worked at least 1,000 hours, with full vesting after four years of service. A participant becomes 100 percent vested in the event of death, disability or retirement on or after age 55.

The Company match on salary savings contributions was $0.50 for each dollar contributed up to 4% of the employee’s annual compensation in 2013. The retirement contribution in 2013 was 2% of annual compensation. The Company’s Board of Directors decided not to make a profit sharing contribution for 2013.

The Executive Deferred Compensation Plan is described under “Executive Compensation–Nonqualified Deferred Compensation.”

 

In addition to our retirement programs, the Company provideswe provide employees with welfare benefits, including hospitalization, major medical, disability and group life insurance plans and paid vacation. We also maintain a Section 125 cafeteria plan that allows our employees to set aside pre-tax dollars to pay for certain benefits. All of the full-time employees of the Company and the Bank, including the named executive officers, are eligible to participate in the Retirement Savings Plan and our welfare plans, subject to the terms of those plans.

 

The Bank provides supplemental disability insurance to certain members of executive management, including the named executive officers, in excess of the maximum benefit of $10,000 per month provided under the group plan for all employees. The supplemental insurance provides a benefit up to 70% of the executive’s monthly pre-disability income based on the executive’s base salary and annual incentive compensation. Coverage can be converted and maintained by the individual participant after employment ends. The benefit may be reduced by income from other sources, and a partial benefit is paid if a disabled participant is able to work on a part-time basis. In 2013,2016, the Company paid a total of $10,604$4,917 for supplemental disability insurance for the named executive officers.

 

The retirement and employee welfare benefits paid by the Company for the named executive officers that are required to be disclosed in this proxy statement are included below in the “Summary Compensation Table,” the “Components of All Other Compensation,” and the “Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Table,” and are described in the footnotes thereto.

Executive Perquisites

 

We do not consider perquisites to be a significant element of our compensation program. However, we believe they are important and effective for attracting and retaining certain executive talent. We do not provide tax reimbursements, or “gross-ups,” on perquisites. For 2013, perquisites were limited to a car allowance for Mr. Holland, and personal use of Company-provided cell phones for Ms. Frias and Mr. Houdeshell. For additional details regarding the executive perquisites, see below the “Summary Compensation Table” and the “Components of All Other Compensation.”

 

58

Risk Analysis of Executive Compensation

 

In 2013,2016, the CommitteeCGC and our head of human resourcesChief Human Resources Officer conducted a risk assessment of our compensation plans and programs to determine whether our incentive compensation programs are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company. This risk assessment consisted of a review of cash and equity compensation provided to our employees, with a focus on incentive compensation plans which provide variable compensation to employees based upon performance of the Company, one of its subsidiaries or business units, or the individual employee. The incentive plans are designed to provide a strong link between performance and pay.

 

In light of the review, the Company concluded that the compensation programs are designed with the appropriate balance of risk and reward in relation to our overall business strategy and do not create risk that is reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on us.the Company. The Company also concluded that risks can be effectively monitored and managed. The CommitteeCGC will continue to consider compensation risk implications when making decisions regarding our compensation programs.

 

37

Risk Analysis of Retail Sales Incentive Plans

Seacoast initiated a proactive review of our retail sales incentive plans in May 2016. Management, including our Chief Risk Officer, Chief Human Resources Officer, and head of Community Banking, initiated this effort in connection with our ongoing enterprise-wide business transformation efforts. After speaking to a number of third party firms, Seacoast engaged McLagan Partners (“McLagan”), to lead the effort. We asked McLagan to provide an independent assessment of the alignment of our retail sales incentive plans with industry best practices and our business and customer strategies. We also asked McLagan to identify and recommend action in regards to any potential points of concern that could motivate our incentive eligible associates to engage in inappropriate, unsafe or unsound sales practice.

McLagan presented its findings and recommendations to management in August 2016. Management reviewed McLagan’s work and, in response, developed a Phase I implementation Plan that is currently underway. Our Phase I Implementation Plan is resulting in modifications to our plans and how we oversee and manage incentive-related risks. One example is the formation of our Incentive Oversight Committee (“IOC”), which we established in the Fall of 2016. Our senior leaders, including those identified above, serve on the IOC. The IOC benefits Seacoast by providing centralized oversight of our retail sales incentive plans and other incentive plans. The IOC also ensures that we are making satisfactory progress on our Phase I Implementation activities, which we intend to expand in the future. The expanded effort will encompass other incentive eligible associates in different areas of the Company. It also will enhance and advance the existing controls and governance of our incentive plans, along with the supporting training and performance management processes.

 59

 

60

Clawback Policy

 

In 2013, weWe have adopted a Compensation Recoupment Policy to recover, to the extent practicable and appropriate, incentive compensation from any executive officer when:

 

·the incentive compensation payment or award (or the vesting of such award) was based upon the achievement of financial results that were subsequently the subject of a restatement, regardless of whether the executive engaged in misconduct or otherwise contributed to the requirement for the restatement; and

 

·a lower payment or award would have been made to the executive officer based upon the restated financial results.

 

The policy is available on our website atwww.seacoastbanking.net. www.SeacoastBanking.com. The policy, as written, anticipates the final rules implementing the clawback provision of the Dodd Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010, but will be amended, if necessary, when final regulations are issued by the SEC.

 

Hedging and Pledging Policy

 

In March, 2014, theThe Company has adopted a new hedging and pledging policy. The policy prohibits our employees, including our executive officers and directors, from purchasing any financial instrument or entering into any transaction that is designed to hedge or offset any decrease in the market value of our stock, including exchange funds, prepaid variable forward contracts, equity swaps, puts, calls, collars, forwards or short sales.

 

In addition, directors and executive officers are required to obtain advance approval of any pledging of Company shares as collateral for loans, including holding Company shares in margin accounts. The policy also limits pledging to reasonable purposes (as defined in the policy) and limits the value of the securities pledged in connection with a loan or other indebtedness to $250,000.

Stock Ownership Guidelines

 

The Executive Equity Compensation Program (“Equity Compensation Program”), established in 2006, was designed to provide a framework for annual grants of restricted stock and stock-settled stock appreciation rights under the Company’s shareholder-approved equity plans, in order to promote the corporate objective of increasing executive stock ownership. Equity awards, if any, are granted to certain participants under the program based on guidelines established by the Committee.

As part of the Equity Compensation Program, the Board has established stock ownership guidelines for its officers and directors, as described below:

 

  

Holding Requirement

Individual/GroupStock Ownership Target

Before Ownership

Target Met

After Ownership

Target Met

Chief Executive Officer5 times annual base salary75% of net shares until target number of shares is met50% of net shares held for one year after vesting/ exercise
Tier 1 OfficerOther Senior Executive Officers3 times annual base salary
Tier 2 OfficerNon-Employee Directors2 times annual salary
Tier 3 Officer2 times annual salary
Tier 4 Officer1 times annual salary
Board Members5 times annual retainer

 

61

The Equity Compensation Program was

Our executive compensation program is designed to allow a participant to earn targeted ownership over a reasonable period, usually within five to sevenfour years, provided individual and Company targets are achieved and provided the participant fully participates in the program. The CEO is a Tier 1 participant and each“Net Shares” means shares of stock in excess of those sold or withheld to satisfy the other named executive officers is a Tier 2 participant in the Equity Compensation Program. Tiers 3 through 5 are comprised of Bank officers, including line of business and support officers, senior managers and division heads, and other key contributors. Except forminimum tax liability upon vesting or conversion. CEO Dennis S. Hudson, III and CFO Stephen A. Fowle have met the stock ownership guidelines. The other named executive officers, two of whom have been in senior executive officer positions for less than four years, have not yet met the established stock ownership guidelines, since no equity awards were made in 2008, 2009, 2010 and 2012.guidelines.

 

38

Impact of Deduction Limit

 

Code Section 162(m) generally establishes, with certain exceptions, a $1 million deduction limit for all publicly held companies on compensation paid to an executive officer in any year. The CommitteeCGC gives strong consideration to the deductibility of compensation in making its compensation decisions for executive officers, balancing the goal of maintaining a compensation program which will enable the Company to attract and retain qualified executives with the goal of creating long-term shareholder value.The Committeevalue. The CGC reserves the right to pay executives’ compensation that is not deductible under Section 162(m).

 

Results of Shareholder Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation

62

 

In accordance2017 Compensation Actions

The CGC met in March 2017 and approved a number of changes to our equity incentive strategy, starting with this year’s grant cycle. These changes were made in direct response to shareholder feedback and to ensure that our performance-based equity strategies continue to support our governance and risk management efforts. Specifically:

Impetus for ChangeDesign Changes
Shareholder feedback that our executives needs to own more shares of Seacoast stock

·    PRSUs were granted in lieu of cash bonuses for 2016 performance

·    Performance period for new PSU awards reduced from four years to three years, accelerating the rate at which our executives accumulate shares of Seacoast stock if we perform

·    Vesting period for new Option awards reduced from four years to three years, accelerating the rate at which our executives have the right to exercise their options and receive shares of our common stock

Shareholder feedback that Seacoast needs to perform at levels that equal or exceed the industry

·    PSU metrics changed from cumulative earnings with a modifier based on Return on Tangible Common Equity (“ROTCE”) to three-year compound annualized growth in EPS and average return on equity, which our shareholders views as key indicators of our performance

·    Option performance feature modified so that the stock price vesting hurdle used for prior awards is replaced by a premium option feature for new awards whereby the exercise price of the option is set above the face value of the closing stock price on the date of grant, placing shareholders in front of management for value realized through stock price appreciation

Governance Considerations

·    Reduced PSU performance period, allowing for direct and relevant pay and performance comparisons with industry competitors and alternative investments that share our risk profile

·    Increased the transparency of our PSU program and performance goals by replacing a single type of PSU award with two types of PSU awards. Starting with PSUs granted in April 2017, one type of PSU will be earned for compound annualized growth in EPS and one type of PSU will be earned for average return on equity.

Risk-Considerations

·    Implemented a mandatory deferral feature on new PSU awards so that settlement of 50% of any shares earned for performance will be delayed for an additional 12 months

·    Maintained the 12-month stock holding requirement on 50% of the net shares received upon the exercise of options

·    Maintained service and risk-based vesting requirements on all new performance-contingent and performance-based equity awards and options

·    Continue to grant options with a target value significantly less than the target value of PSU awards and, in most years, and total incentive award values

63

COMPENSATION AND GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE REPORT

The Compensation and Benefits Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis with management. Based on such review and discussions, the Compensation and Benefits Committee recommended to the board of directors, and the board of directors approved, that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statement.

This report shall not be deemed to be “soliciting material” or to be “filed” with the Securities Exchange Commission, nor shall this report be incorporated by reference by any general statement incorporating by reference this 2017 Proxy Statement into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, (the “Exchange Act”) and the Company’s former status as a CPP participant, since 2009 the Company has annually included in its proxy a separate advisory vote on the compensation paid to its executives, as disclosed in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the compensation tables and related proxy disclosure, commonly known as a “say-on-pay” proposal. Our say-on-pay proposals received the majority approval of shareholders every year since 2009. Of the 88,251,626 votes cast on the say-on-pay proposal at the 2013 Annual Meeting (excluding broker non-votes), 66,299,293 votes were cast in favor of the resolution and 2,456,060 were cast against the resolution. The proposal was approved by a vote of 96.4 percent of the total number of votes cast on the proposal. The Company and the Committee have considered these results and concluded that a significant majority of the shareholders supported the Company’s executive compensation program.shall not otherwise be deemed filed under such Acts.

 

As noted above, following the end to the compensation restrictions under the CPP and in order to promote the Board’s comprehensive plan to improve profitability in 2013 and beyond, the Committee adopted a new compensation program in 2013, which is being fully implemented in 2014. The Committee will continue to monitor best practices, future advisory votes on executive compensation and other shareholder feedback to guide it in evaluating the alignment of the Company’s executive compensation program with the interests of the Company and its shareholders.

Compensation and Governance Committee:
H. Gilbert Culbreth, Jr., Chair
Julie H. Daum
Maryann Goebel

 

39
64 

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION TABLES

 

20132016 SUMMARY COMPENSATION

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION TABLE

 

The table below sets forth the elements that comprise total compensation for the named executive officers of the Company for the periods indicated.

 

2013 SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

                Non-Equity       
          Stock  Option  Incentive Plan  All Other    
Name and Principal   Salary  Bonus  Awards  Awards  Compensation  Compensation  Total 
Position Year ($)(1)  ($)(2)  ($)(3)  ($)(3)  ($)  ($)(4)  ($) 
                        
Dennis S. Hudson, III 2016  550,000      357,489   175,881      33,530   1,116,900 
Chairman & CEO of 2015  537,852   100,000   454,049   39,773      42,434   1,174,108 
Seacoast and Bank 2014  500,000      264   111,168      24,669   636,101 
                               
Stephen A. Fowle 2016  330,000      97,486   47,968      2,750   478,204 
EVP & CFO of Seacoast 2015  243,903   150,000(5)  757,998         93,216   1,245,117 
and Bank                              
                               
Charles K. Cross, Jr. 2016  293,750      168,992   83,144      23,165   569,051 
EVP, Commercial Banking 2015  273,333   125,000   249,443   21,850      29,285   698,911 
of Bank 2014  257,500   80,000   128,956   55,584      28,051   550,091 
                               
David D. Houdeshell 2016  265,000      90,995   44,769      11,141   411,905 
EVP & Chief Risk Officer of 2015  262,500   75,000   163,559   14,327      17,911   533,297 
Seacoast and Bank 2014  250,000   35,000   264   55,584      15,227   356,075 
                               
Charles M. Shaffer 2016  287,499      146,244   71,952      19,901   525,596 
EVP, Community Banking 2015  248,333   100,000   204,606   17,923      22,218   593,080 
of Bank 2014  220,000   48,100   116,634   55,584      24,550   464,868 

 

                Non-Stock  All    
                Incentive  Other    
          Stock  Options  Plan Com-  Compen-    
Name and Principal   Salary  Bonus  Awards  Awards  Pensation  sation  Total 
Position Year ($)(1)  ($)  ($)(2)  ($)(2)  ($)  ($)(3)  ($) 
                        
Dennis S. Hudson, III 2013 $500,000  $138  $471,429  $46,972     $26,151  $1,044,690 
Chairman & Chief 2012  500,000               21,197   521,197 
Executive Officer of 2011  500,000      141,063         8,703   649,766 
Seacoast and the Bank                              
                               
William R. Hahl 2013 $310,000     $243,571  $12,106     $23,392  $589,069 
Executive Vice President & 2012  310,000               24,269   334,269 
Chief Financial Officer of 2011  310,000      87,458         14,001   411,459 
Seacoast and the Bank                              
                               
David D. Houdeshell 2013 $250,000     $196,429  $10,169     $12,913  $469,511 
Executive Vice President & 2012  225,000               11,742   236,742 
Chief Credit Officer of 2011  218,750      39,504         5,018   263,272 
Seacoast and the Bank                              
                              
Maria G. Frias 2013 $175,000     $110,000  $5,811     $10,919  $301,730 
Executive Vice President & 2012  160,242               9,528   169,770 
Chief Risk Officer of                              
Seacoast and the Bank                              
                               
H. Russell Holland, III(4) 2013 $165,118              $146,232  $311,350 
Former Executive Vice 2012  340,912(5)              37,781   378,693 
President & Chief Lending 2011  290,901(5)     79,250         24,266   394,417 
Officer of Seacoast and theBank                              

(1)A portion of executive’s base salary included in this number may have been deferred into the Company’s Executive Deferred Compensation Plan (“EDCP”), the amounts of which are disclosed in the Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Table for the applicable year. Executive officers who are also directors do not receive any additional compensation for services provided as a director.

 

(2)Cash bonuses earned for FY16 performance were replaced with performance-based stock awards for our CEO and with restricted stock units for our other executive officers, each of which were granted in 2017 and, pursuant to proxy rules, are not reported in 2016 compensation.

(3)Represents the aggregate grant date fair value as of the respective grant date for each award calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. The assumptions made in valuing stock awards reported in this column are discussed in Note J to the Company’s audited financial statements included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013.2016. Generally, the aggregate grant date fair value is the amount that the company expects to expense for accounting purposes and does not correspond to the actual value that the named executives will realize from the award. For additional information regarding such grants, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis – Summary – 2013 Compensation” and “Elements- Elements of the 20132016 Compensation Program for Executive Officers – Long Term Incentives.- Equity Awards.” See also “2013“2016 Grants of Plan-Based Awards” below.

 

65

Each of our executive officers received PSUs. With respect to the PSU awards, the grant date fair value included in the table assumes that target performance is achieved. The maximum value for each executive as of the grant date, assuming the highest level of performance will be achieved, is:

Name Target Value In
Table Above
  Maximum Value 
Dennis S. Hudson, III $357,489  $625,611 
Stephen A. Fowle $97,486  $170,608 
Charles K. Cross, Jr. $168,992  $295,733 
David D. Houdeshell $90,995  $159,241 
Charles M. Shaffer $146,244  $255,927 

(3)(4)Additional information regarding other compensation is provided in “2013“2016 Components of All Other Compensation” below.

 

(4)(5)Mr. Holland served as an executive officer of the Bank and the Company through July 19, 2013.Cash incentive award guaranteed in offer letter dated February 10, 2015.

 

(5)Of the base salary received by Mr. Holland in 2011 and 2012, $10,001 and $60,013, respectively, was paid in salary shares.

20132016 COMPONENTS OF ALL OTHER COMPENSATION

 

  Company Paid
Contributions to
Retirement Savings
Plan
                      
Name Match  Discre-
tionary
Retire-
ment
  Company
Paid
Contribu-
tions to

Executive
Deferred
Compen-
sation
Plan(1)
  Premium
on Supple-
mental
Disability
Insurance
  Excess
Life
Insurance
Benefit
  Paid by
Company
into
Cafeteria
Plan
  Per-
quisites
  Consulting
Payments
  Total 
Dennis. S. Hudson, III $5,100  $5,100  $9,900  $3,179  $2,322  $550        $26,151 
                                     
William R. Hahl $5,100  $5,100  $2,300  $3,484  $6,858  $550        $23,392 
                                     
David Houdeshell $5,000  $5,000     $979  $979  $550  $405(2)   $12,913 
                                     
Maria G. Frias $3,500  $3,500     $1,542  $1,242  $550  $585(2)   $10,919 
                                     
H. Russell Holland, III $3,502        $1,420  $439  $275  $8,960(3)$131,636(4) $146,232 
  Company Paid                
  Contributions  Company Paid             
  to Retirement  Contributions  Car  Cell Phone  Other    
Name Savings Plan  to EDCP(1)  Allowance  Allowance  Perquisites  Total 
Dennis. S. Hudson, III $16,097  $8,433  $9,000        $33,530 
Stephen A. Fowle $2,750              $2,750 
Charles K. Cross, Jr. $11,430     $9,000   540   2,194(2) $23,165 
David D. Houdeshell $10,600         540     $11,141 
Charles M. Shaffer $9,150  $1,750  $9,000        $19,901 

 

(1)Earned in reporting year, but contributed in following year. Also reported in the “Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Table.”

(2)PersonalIncludes $2,074 for personal use of Company-provided cell phone.club membership and $120 for gym membership.

 

(3)66Car allowance.

 

(4)Mr. Holland served as an executive officer of the Bank and Company through July 19, 2013. Represents payment for post-employment consulting services paid under the consulting agreement described below under “Employment and Change in Control Agreements – Former Executive Officer Agreement.”

20132016 GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS

 

The following table sets forth certain information concerning plan-based awards granted during 20132016 to the named executive officers.

 

    Estimated Future Payouts Under
Equity Incentive Plan Awards
          
Name Grant Date 

Threshold

(#)(1)

  

Target

(#)(1)

  Maximum  
(#)(1)
  

All Other
Option
Awards:

Number of
Securities
Underlying
Options

(#)(1)

  Exercise or
Base Price of
Option
Awards
($/Sh(1))
  

Grant Date

Fair Value of
Stock and
Option
Awards(2)

($)

 
Dennis S. Hudson, III 6/28/13  37,500   42,858   64,823          $471,429 
  6/28/13              19,400  $11.00  $46,972 
William R. Hahl 6/28/13  19,375   22,143   33,491          $243,571 
  6/28/13              5,000  $11.00  $12,106 
David Houdeshell 6/28/13  15,625   17,858   27,010          $196,429 
  6/28/13              4,200  $11.00  $10,169 
Maria G. Frias 6/28/13  8,750   10,000   15,125          $110,000 
  6/28/13              2,400  $11.00  $5,811 
H. Russell Holland, III                   
             All Other  All Other       
             Stock  Option       
             Awards:  Awards:     Grant Date 
    Estimated Future Payouts  Number  Number of  Exercise or  Fair Value 
    Under Equity Incentive  of Shares  Securities  Base Price  of Stock 
    Plan Awards  of Stock  Underlying  of Option  and Option 
  Grant Threshold  Target  Maximum  or Units  Options  Awards  Awards(1) 
Name Date (#)  (#)  (#)  (#)  (#)  ($/Sh)  ($) 
Dennis S. Hudson, III 2/29/2016  12,061   24,122   42,214              357,489 
  2/29/2016                  51,956(2)  14.82     
                               
Stephen A. Fowle 2/29/2016  3,289   6,578   11,512             97,486 
  2/29/2016                  14,170(2)  14.82     
                               
Charles K. Cross, Jr. 2/29/2016  5,702   11,403   19,955             168,992 
  2/29/2016                  24,561(2)  14.82     
                               
David D. Houdeshell 2/29/2016  3,070   6,140   10,745             90,995 
  2/29/2016                  13,225(2)  14.82     
                               
Charles M. Shaffer 2/29/2016  4,934   9,868   17,269             146,244 
  2/29/2016                  21,255(2)  14.82     

 

(1)Adjusted for the reverse stock split that took effect on December 13, 2013.

(2)Represents the aggregate grant date fair value as of the respective grant date for each award, calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. The assumptions made in valuing stock awards reported in this column are discussed in Note J to the Company’s audited financial statements included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013.2016.

 

(2)Option with two-tiered vesting as described under “Design Highlights of Equity Awards Issued in FY16 – Performance Stock Options”. The performance criteria were met and option began vesting in 1/48th share increments on December 1, 2016, subject to continuing service requirements.

67

Employment and Change in Control Agreements

 

The Company and the Bank currently maintain employment and change in control agreements with certain of the Company’s executive officers, the terms of which are described in more detail below.

Employment Agreement with Mr. Hudson

 

TheIn December 18, 2014, the Company and the Bank entered into an employment agreement with Dennis S. Hudson, III onIII. The new employment agreement replaced the previous employment agreement between Mr. Hudson and Seacoast and the Bank dated January 18, 1994. 1994, as amended December 31, 2008, and the change of control agreement between these parties dated December 24, 2003.

The new employment agreement hadhas an initial term of three years and provides for automatic one-year extensions unless expressly not renewed. This(3) years. Under the agreement, was amended on December 31, 2008 to comply with Code Section 409A and the final regulations issued thereunder.

The employment agreement provides for hospitalization, insurance,Mr. Hudson receives a minimum base salary of $500,000 per year, medical, long-term disability and life insurance in accordance with the Bank’s insurance plans for senior management, as well as a car allowance and reasonable club dues.any other perquisites that are approved by the Board. Mr. Hudson may also receive other compensation including bonuses, and he will be entitled to participate in all current and future employee benefit plans and arrangements in which senior management of the Bank may participate. In addition, the agreement contains certain non-competition, non-disclosure and non-solicitation covenants.

Under the agreement, if Mr. Hudson is terminated for “cause”, or resigns without “good reason,” as defined in the agreement, he will receive payment of his base salary and unused vacation through the date of termination, and any unreimbursed expenses (collectively, the “Accumulated Obligations”). The employment agreement includesalso contains provisions for termination upon Mr. Hudson’s death or permanent disability and also for cause, which includes willful and continued failure to perform the assigned duties, crimes, and breaches of the Bank’s Code of Conduct.disability.

 

The agreement also provides for termination upon the occurrence of a change in control. TheIf Mr. Hudson resigns for “good reason” or is terminated “without cause” prior to a change in control, provisionshe will receive: 1) the Accumulated Obligations; and 2) upon execution of a release of all claims against the Company, severance of: a) two times his base salary in effect on the date of separation, b) two times a bonus equal to the highest bonus earned by the Executive for the previous three full fiscal years (“Cash Bonus”), and c) continuing group medical, dental, vision and prescription drug plan benefits (“Continuing Benefits”) for two years. If Mr. Hudson’s employmentHudson resigns for “good reason” or is terminated “without cause”, within twelve months following a change in control (as defined in the agreement), he will receive: 1) the Accumulated Obligations; and 2) upon execution of a release of all claims against the Company, severance of: a) three times his base salary in effect on the date of separation, b) three times the Cash Bonus; and c) Continuing Benefits for 36 months.

In addition, under the agreement, have been superseded by those in his changeMr. Hudson is subject to the Company’s policies applicable to executives generally, including its policies relating to claw-back of control agreement discussed below.compensation.

 

For a further discussion of the payments and benefits to which Mr. Hudson would be entitled upon termination of his employment see “2013“2015 Other Potential Post-Employment Payments.”

68

Change in Control AgreementsAgreement with Mr. Hudson and Mr. HahlChief Financial Officer

 

On December 24, 2003, theThe Company entered into a change in control employment agreementsagreement with Dennis S. Hudson, III and William R. Hahl.Stephen A. Fowle (referred to here as the “Executive”) on August 6, 2015, as previously agreed to in his offer letter dated February 10, 2015. This agreement terminated with Mr. Fowle’s departure from the Company on March 31, 2017. The change in control agreements hadagreement has an initial termsterm of three years for Mr. Hudsonone year and two years for Mr. Hahl, and provideprovides for automatic one-year extensions unless expressly not renewed. A change in control, as defined in the agreement, must occur during these periodsthe period (the “Change in Control Period”) to trigger the agreement. Mr. Hudson’s agreement supersedes the change in control provisions in his employment agreement with the Bank.

 

The change in control employment agreements with Mr. Hudson and Mr. Hahl provideagreement provides that, once a change in control has occurred, the executive subject to the contract (the “Subject Executive”)Executive and the Company agree to continue, for the Change in Control Period, the Subject Executive’s employment in the same position as held in the 120-day120 day period prior to the change in control. If the Subject Executive is terminated for “cause” or resigns “without goodwithout “good reason,” as defined in the agreement, the Subject Executive will receive payment of the Subject Executive’shis base salary and unused vacation through the date of termination; and any previously accrued and deferred compensation (the(collectively, the “Accrued Obligations”).

If the Subject Executive resigns for “good reason” or is terminated “without cause,” or resignsthe Executive will receive: 1) the Accrued Obligations; 2) a bonus equal to the highest bonus earned by the Executive for any reason duringthe previous three full fiscal years (“Highest Bonus”) multiplied by a 30-day period specifiedfraction (the numerator of which is the number of days between January 1 and the Executive’s date of termination and the denominator of which is 365); 3) an amount equal to the Executive’s annual base salary in effect on the date of termination, plus the Highest Bonus; and 4) health and other welfare benefits, as defined in the contract, the Subject Executive will receive:

·the Accrued Obligations;

·a bonus equal to the highest bonus earned by the Subject Executive for the previous three full fiscal years (“Highest Bonus”) multiplied by a fraction (the numerator of which is the number of days between January 1 and the Subject Executive’s date of termination and the denominator of which is 365);

·an amount equal to what the Subject Executive’s annual base salary plus Highest Bonus would have been over the Change in Control Period; and

·health and other welfare benefits for the duration of the Change in Control Period.

agreement, for one year following termination. In addition, all unvested stock options to acquire stock of the Company and all awards of restricted stock of the Company held by Subject Executive as of the date of termination shall be immediately and fully vested as of the date of termination and, in the case of stock options, shall be fully exercisable as of the date of termination.termination and shall remain exercisable for the period of time set forth in the applicable option agreement. The Executive is required to execute a release of claims as a condition to receipt of severance under the CIC Agreement.

Change in Control Agreements with Other Named Executive Officers

The Company entered into change in control employment agreements with Messrs. Cross, Houdeshell and Shaffer (each referred to here as the “Executive” or by name) on September 21, 2016. The CIC agreement with each Executive supersedes the previous change in control agreement between each Executive and the Company dated October 28, 2014. The new agreement: 1) eliminates the excise tax gross-up payment contained in the 2014 agreements and ii) does not provide benefits that are paid before a change in control closes or if the acquirer retains the executive.

Each agreement has an initial term of one year and provides for automatic one-year extensions unless expressly not renewed. A change in control, as defined in the agreement, must occur during the period (the “Change in Control Period”) to trigger the agreement. The agreement provides that, once a change in control has occurred, the Company agrees to continue the employment of the Executive subject to the contract for a one-year period, in a comparable position as the Executive held in the 120-day period prior to the change in control, and with the same annual base pay and target bonus opportunity. If the Executive is terminated “without cause” or resigns for “good reason,” as defined in the agreement, during the one-year period following a change in control, the Executive will receive:

69

·cash severance equal to a multiple (two times, for Messrs. Cross and Shaffer, and one times for Mr. Houdeshell) of the sum of (i) Executive’s Annual Base Salary at the rate in effect on the date of termination, and (ii) the Executive’s average annual performance bonus for the last three full fiscal years prior to the date of termination (“Executive’s Average Annual Performance Bonus”);
·a prorated final year bonus, based on the Executive’s Average Annual Performance Bonus; and
·health and other welfare benefits, as defined in the agreement, for a period of time following termination (18 months for Messrs. Cross and Shaffer, and 12 months for Mr. Houdeshell).

The Executive is required to execute a release of claims as a condition to receipt of severance under the CIC Agreement and is subject to protective covenants prohibiting the disclosure and use of the Company’s confidential information and, during the one-year period following a termination by the company any reason other than for death or disability, or by the Executive for Good Reason, protective covenants regarding non-competition, non-solicitation of protected customers; non-solicitation of employees, and non-disparagement of the Company or its directors, officers, employees or affiliates.

Transition Agreement with CFO

On February 3, 2017, the Bank entered into a Transition Agreement with Stephen A. Fowle which became effective on February 10, 2017, related to his decision to stepdown as CFO and his termination of employment with the Company on March 31, 2017. The agreement provides that Mr. Fowle will be entitled to certain severance benefits upon the execution of a mutual release of claims against the Bank and its affiliates. The release of claims was signed on March 30, 2017 and becomes became effective on March 31, 2017. Pursuant to the terms of the Transition Agreement, Mr. Fowle will be entitled to receive a payment in the amount of $165,000 no later than 15 days following the effective date of the release. Mr. Fowle will be entitled to receive an additional payment in the amount of $82,500 on October 1, 2017 in the event Mr. Fowle has not obtained new employment. Subject to certain exceptions, Mr. Fowle will not be entitled to such additional payment in the event he has obtained new employment on or before such date. The Bank will make a lump sum payment to Mr. Fowle equal to 18 months of certain COBRA insurance premiums. In addition, certain of Mr. Fowle’s unvested and outstanding shares of restricted stock will vest and certain unvested and outstanding performance options will vest and become exercisable. The Transition Agreement requires Mr. Fowle be subject to certain restrictive covenants, which include non-solicitation of Bank customers and employees, and non-disclosure of confidential and proprietary information about the Bank, its employees, customers and clients.

 

For a further discussion of the benefits and payments provided for under these agreements see “2013“2016 Other Potential Post-Employment Payments.”

70

Former Executive Officer Agreement

 

The Bank entered into an employment agreement with H. Russell Holland, III on January 2, 2007. Mr. Holland’s employment agreement was similar to Mr. Hudson’s employment agreement, which is described above, except that Mr. Holland’s agreement entitled him to receive reasonable club dues and an automobile allowance. In addition, Mr. Holland’s agreement provided that he may have terminated the contract within one year following the date of a qualifying change in control or if after a change in control, there was a change in duties and powers customarily associated with the office designated in such contract. Upon any such termination following a change in control, Mr. Holland would have been entitled to receive base salary, hospitalization and other health benefits for two years.

On July 10, 2013, the Company and H. Russell Holland, III entered into a separation agreement and general release outlining the terms of his termination of employment. The separation agreement amended his employment agreement to reduce the periods of the covenant not to compete and the covenant not to solicit employees from two years following termination of employment to one year. In addition, the Company agreed to accelerate the vesting of 55,810 shares (or 11,162 shares after adjusting for the Company’s reverse stock split that took effect on December 13, 2013) of restricted stock granted to Mr. Holland by the Company. Mr. Holland did not receive any severance in connection with his termination of employment.

71

 

On July 10, 2013, the Company and Mr. Holland also entered into a consulting agreement which provided that Mr. Holland would perform certain services in exchange for consulting payments equal to $26,320 per month, plus reimbursement of reasonable business expenses. The consulting agreement had a term of six months and included covenants relating to non-disclosure of the Company’s confidential information.

  

OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR END 20132016

 

The following table sets forth certain information concerning outstanding equity awards as of December 31, 20132016 granted to the named executive officers. This table includes the number of shares of Common Stockcommon stock covered by both exercisable options, non-exercisable options or stock appreciation rights (“SARs”), and unexercised unearned options or SARs awarded under an equity incentive plan that were outstanding as of December 31, 2013.2016. Also reported are restricted stock units and restricted stock awards, and their market value, that had not vested as of December 31, 2013.2016.

 

  Option Awards  Stock Awards 
Name Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#) (1)
Exercisable
  Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Option
(#) (1)
Unexer-
cisable
  Option
Exercise
Price
($) (1)
  Option
Expiration
Date
  Number
of Shares
or Units
of Stock
That
Have Not
Vested (2)
(#) (1)
  Market
Value of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested (3)
($)
  Equity
incentive
plan
awards:
number of
unearned
shares, units
or other
rights that
have not
vested
(#) (1)
  Equity
incentive plan
awards:
market or
payout value
of unearned
shares, units
or other
rights that
have not
vested
($)
 
                         
D. Hudson, III  6,000     $112.00   12/21/2014                 
   5,520(4)    $133.60   05/16/2016                 
   14,627(5)    $111.10   04/02/2017                 
      19,400  $11.00   06/28/2023                 
                   19,868(6) $242,390         
                           42,858(7) $522,868 
                                 
W. Hahl  1,000     $112.00   12/21/2014                 
   1,470(4)    $133.60   05/16/2016                 
   3,909(5)    $111.10   04/02/2017                 
      5,000  $11.00   06/28/2023                 
                   12,318(6) $150,280         
                           22,143(7) $270,145 
                                 
D. Houdeshell     4,200  $11.00   06/28/2023                 
                   5,564(6) $67,881         
                           17,858(7) $217,868 
                                 
M. Frias  300     $112.00   12/21/2014                 
   580(4)    $133.60   05/16/2016                 
   1,201(5)    $111.10   04/02/2017                 
      2,400  $11.00   06/28/2023                 
                   1,982(6) $24,180         
                           10,000(7) $122,000 
                                 
H. Holland, III                        

  OPTION AWARDS 
                   Equity incentive plan  Equity incentive plan awards: 
           Market Value of  awards: number of  market or payout value of 
  Number of Securities  Number of Securities  Option  Option  Number of Shares or  Shares or Units of  unearned shares, units or  unearned shares, units or 
 Name Underlying Unexercised
Option (#) Exercisable
  Underlying Unexercised
Option (#) Unexercisable
  Exercise
Price ($)
  Expiration
Date
  Units of Stock That
Have Not Vested(1) (#)
  Stock That Have Not
Vested(2) ($)
  other rights that have not
Vested (#)
  other rights that have not
Vested(2)($)
 
   14,627(3)      111.10   04/02/2017                 
   11,640   7,760(4)  11.00   06/28/2023                 
   33,333   16,667(5)  10.54   04/29/2024                 
Dennis S. Hudson, III  6,755   11,220(6)  12.63   01/29/2023                 
   1,102   50,854(7)  14.82   02/29/2024                 
                   42,786(8)  943,859         
                           35,950(9)  793,057 
                           24,122   532,131 
                                 
Stephen A. Fowle  305   13,865(7)  14.82   02/29/2024                 
                   34,223(11)  754,959         
                           6,578(10)   145,111 
                                 
   1,440   960(4)  11.00   06/28/2023                 
   16,667   8,333(5)  10.54   04/29/2024                 
Charles K. Cross Jr.  3,725   6,150(6)  12.63   01/29/2023                 
   544   24,017(7)  14.82   02/29/2024                 
                   976(12)  21,531   19,750(9)  435,685 
                   17,866(8)  394,124   11,403(10)  251,550 
                                 
   2,520   1,680(4)  11.00   06/28/2023                 
   16,667   8,333(5)  10.54   04/29/2024                 
   2,455   4,020(6)  12.63   01/29/2023                 
David D. Houdshell  300   12,925(7)  14.82   02/29/2024                 
                   17,829(8)   393,308         
                           12,950(9)  285,677 
                           6,140(10)  135,448 
                                 
   993(3)      111.10   04/02/2017                 
   1,440   960(4)  11.00   06/28/2023                 
   16,667   8,333(5)  10.54   04/29/2024                 
Charles M. Shaffer  3,060   5,040(6)  12.63   01/29/2023                 
   481   20,774(7)  14.82   02/29/2024                 
                   16,333(8)   360,306         
                           16,200(9)  357,372 
                           9,868(10)  217,688 

72

 

(1)Adjusted forDuring the reverse stock split that took effect on December 13, 2013.

(2)Thevesting period, the named executive officer has full voting and dividend rights with respect to the restricted stock, duringbut does not have dividend rights with respect to the vesting period.units until the performance criteria has been met.

(3)(2)For the purposes of this table, the market value is determined using the closing price of the Company’s Common Stockcommon stock on December 31, 20132016 ($12.20)22.06).

 

(4)Represents fully-vested stock-settled stock appreciation rights granted to the named executive officer on May 16, 2006.

(5)(3)Represents fully-vested stock-settled stock appreciation rights granted to the named executive officer on April 2, 2007.

 

(6)(4)Represents time-vested restrictedoption to purchase common stock, of which one-half of the unexercisable shares covered by this award of Common Stock granted towill vest on June 28, 2017, and the named executive on August 23, 2011. Asremaining unexercisable shares will, as long as named executive officer remains employed by the Company, vest on June 28, 2018.

(5)Represents option to purchase common stock, of which the remaining shares will, as long as named executive officer remains employed by the Company, vest on April 29, 2017.

(6)Represents option to purchase common stock; the shares covered by this award began vesting in 1/48th share increments on August 1, 2015, and the remaining shares will, as long as named executive officer remains employed by the Company, vest in their entirety on August 23, 2016.1/48th increments each month thereafter.

 

(7)Represents performance-vesting restrictedoption to purchase common stock; the shares covered by this award began vesting in 1/48th share increments on December 1, 2016, and the remaining shares will, as long as named executive officer remains employed by the Company, vest in 1/48th increments each month thereafter.

(8)Restricted stock units granted on June 28, 2013 and August 1, 2014 which were subject to performance requirements over a period ending December 31, 2015. The performance requirements were met and one-half of the indicated shares vest each year on December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2018.

(9)Represents performance-vesting restricted stock units granted on January 29, 2015, representing the named executive officer’s right to earn, on a one-for-one basis, shares of Common Stock.common stock, subject to performance requirements over a period ending December 31, 2018.

(10)Represents performance-vesting restricted stock units granted on February 29, 2016, representing the named executive officer’s right to earn, on a one-for-one basis, shares of common stock, subject to performance requirements over a period ending December 31, 2019. The awards are more fully described above under “Elements“2016 Equity Awards–Performance Share Unit (“PSU”) Awards”.

(11)Represents time-vested restricted stock award of common stock granted to Mr. Fowle on May 12, 2015, of which 16,856 shares covered by this award vested on March 15, 2017, and the remaining 17,367 shares vested on March 31, 2017 pursuant to the Transition Agreement between Mr. Fowle and the Company described above.

73

(12)Represents time-vested restricted stock award of common stock granted to Mr. Cross on April 1, 2013. One-half of the 2013 Compensation Program for Executive Officers—Portfolio Stock Awards (Performance-Vesting RSUs)”.outstanding shares vested on April 1, 2017, and the remaining shares will, as long as Mr. Cross remains employed by the Company, vest on April 1, 2018.

 

20132016 OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED

 

The following table reports the exercise of stock options, and vesting of stock awards or similar instruments during 2013,2015, granted to the named executive officers and the value of the gains realized on vesting. No stock options were exercised in 2016.

 

  Stock Awards 
Name 

Number of 
Shares Acquired
on Vesting
(#) (1)

  

Value
Realized on
Vesting
($)(2)

 
Dennis S. Hudson, III  3,311  $40,394 
William R. Hahl      
David Houdeshell      
Maria G. Frias      
H. Russell Holland, III  11,162  $125,572 
 Stock Awards 
Name Number of Shares Acquired
on Vesting (#)
  Value Realized
on Vesting ($)
 
       
Dennis S. Hudson, III  41,261  $793,195 
         
Stephen A. Fowle  16,885  $254,964 
         
Charles K. Cross, Jr.  9,420  $204,843 
         
David D. Houdeshell  14,477  $286,591 
         
Charles M. Shaffer  10,286  $214,422 
         

 

(1)Adjusted for the reverse stock split that took effect on December 13, 2013.

(2)The value realized was determined using the closing price of the stock on the applicable vesting date.

20132016 NONQUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION

 

The following table discloses, for each of the named executive officers, contributions, earnings and balances during 20132016 under the Executive Deferred Compensation Plan, described below.

  

Name Executive
Contributions in Last
Fiscal Year
($)
  Registrant
Contributions in
Last Fiscal Year
($) (1)
  Aggregate
Earnings in Last
Fiscal Year
($) (2)
  Aggregate
Withdrawals/
Distributions
($)
  Aggregate Balance
at Last Fiscal Year
End
($)
 
                
D. S. Hudson, III    $9,900  $148,340     $631,421(3)
W. R. Hahl $45,427  $2,300  $100,453     $422,218(4)
D. Houdeshell(5)               
M. G. Frias(5)               
H. R. Holland, III       $2,061  $9,054(6)   
  Executive  Registrant  Aggregate  Aggregate  Aggregate 
  contributions  Contributions  Earnings in  Withdrawals/  Balance at 
  in Last Fiscal  in Last Fiscal  Last Fiscal  Distributions  Last Fiscal 
Name Year ($)  Year ($)(1)  Year ($)(2)  ($)  Year End ($) 
Dennis. S. Hudson, III  5,590   8,433   109,180      840,570(3)
Stephen A. Fowle(4)               
Charles K. Cross, Jr.(4)               
David D. Houdeshell(4)               
Charles M. Shaffer  5,930   1,750   744      10,997 

74

  

(1)Total amount included in the All Other Compensation column of the Summary Compensation Table. This amount was contributable in 2013,2016, but was credited to the account of the named executive officer in 2014.2017.

 

(2)None of the earnings or dividends paid under the Executive Deferred Compensation Plan are above-market or preferential.

 

(3)Includes $230,238contributed$252,296 contributed by the Company, as well as executive contributions, which were included in the Summary Compensation Table for previous years.

 

(4)Includes $37,199contributed by the Company, as well as executive contributions, whichMessrs. Fowle, Cross, and Houdeshell were included in the Summary Compensation Table for previous years.

(5)Ms. Frias and Mr. Houdeshell are not participants in the Executive Deferred Compensation Plan.

(6)Includes $3,886contributed by the Company, as well as executive contributions, which were includedPlan in the Summary Compensation Table for previous years.2016.

 

Executive Deferred Compensation Plan

 

The Bank’s Executive Deferred Compensation Plan is designed to permit a select group of management and highly compensated employees, including two of the current named executive officers (Hudson(Messrs. Hudson and Hahl) and Mr. Holland prior to his resignation,Shaffer), to elect to defer a portion of their compensation until their separation from service with the Company, and to receive matching and other Company contributions that are precluded under the Company’s Retirement Savings Plan as a result of limitations imposed under ERISA.

 

The Executive Deferred Compensation Plan was amended and restated in 2007 to reflect changes arising from requirements under Code Section 409A and the underlying final regulations. As a result, each participant account is separated into sub-accounts to reflect:

 

·contributions and investment gains or losses that were earned and vested on or before December 31, 2004, and any subsequent investment gains or losses thereon (the “Grandfathered Benefits”); and

 

·contributions and earnings that were earned and vested after December 31, 2004 (the “Non-Grandfathered Benefits”).

A participant’s elective deferrals to the Executive Deferred Compensation Plan are immediately vested. The Company contributions to the Executive Deferred Compensation Plan vest at the rate of 25 percent for each year of service the participant has accrued under the Retirement Savings Plan, with full vesting after four years of service. If a participant would become immediately vested in his or her Company contributions under the Retirement Savings Plan for any reason (such as death, disability, or retirement on or after age 55), then he or she would also become immediately vested in his or her account balance held in the Executive Deferred Compensation Plan.

 

Each participant directs how his or her account in the Executive Deferred Compensation Plan is invested among the available investment vehicle options. The plan’s investment options are reviewed and selected annually by a committee appointed by the Board of Directors of the Company to administer the plan. The plan committee may appoint other persons or entities to assist it in its functions. No earnings or dividends paid under the Executive Deferred Compensation Plan are above-market or preferential.

75

 

All amounts paid under the plan are paid in cash from the general assets of the Company, either directly by the Company or via a “rabbi trust” the Company has established in connection with the plan. Nothing contained in the plan creates a trust or fiduciary relationship of any kind between the Company and a participant, beneficiary or other person having a claim to payments under the plan. A participant or beneficiary does not have an interest in his or her plan account that is greater than that of an unsecured creditor.

 

Upon a participant’s separation from service with the Company, he or she will receive the balance of his or her account in cash in one of the following three forms specified by the participant at the time of initial deferral election, or a subsequent permitted amendment:

 

·a lump sum;

 

·monthly installments over a period not to exceed five years; or

 

·a combination of an initial lump sum of a specified dollar amount and the remainder in monthly installments over a period not to exceed five (5) years.

 

A participant may change his or her existing distribution election relating to Non-Grandfathered Benefits only in very limited circumstances. Upon death of the participant, any balance in his or her account will be paid in a lump sum to his or her designated beneficiary or to his or her estate.

  

48
76 

  

2013 other potential post-employment payments2016 OTHER POTENTIAL POST-EMPLOYMENT PAYMENTS

 

The following table quantifies, for each of the named executive officers, the potential post-employment payments under the provisions and agreements described above under “Employment and Change in Control Agreements,” assuming that the triggering event occurred on December 31, 2013.2016. The closing market price of the Company’s common stock on that date was $12.20$22.06 per share. None of the named executive officers would be eligible for any of these payments if they were terminated for cause. The amounts shown for Mr. Holland in the following table represent amounts and benefits paid pursuant to his separation agreement, as described under “Employment and Change in Control Agreements – Former Executive officer Agreement” above.

 

Name Term
(in years)
(#)
  Cash
Severance
($)
  Value of Other
Annual
Benefits
($)
  Total Value of
Outstanding
Stock Awards
that
Immediately
Vest
($)
  In-the-Money
Value of
Outstanding
Stock Option
Awards or SARs
that
Immediately
Vest
($)
  Total Value of
Benefit
($)
 
                   
Dennis S. Hudson, III                        
Upon Termination without Cause(1)  2(2) $1,000,000  $52,302        $1,052,302 
Upon Death or Disability(1)  2(2)  1,000,000   52,302  $765,257(3) $23,280(3)  1,840,839 
Upon Termination Following a Change-in-Control(4)  3   1,500,000   78,453   765,257   23,280   2,366,990 
Upon Change-in-Control without Termination           765,257   23,280   788,537 
                         
William R. Hahl                        
Upon Death or Disability          $420,424(3) $6,000(3) $426,424 
Upon Termination Following a Change-in-Control(4)  2  $620,000  $46,784   420,424   6,000   1,093,208 
Upon Change-in-Control without Termination           420,424   6,000   426,424 
David Houdeshell                       
Upon Disability            $285,748(3) $5,040(3) $290,788 
Upon Death             285,748(3)  5,040(3)  290,788 
Upon Termination Following a Change-in-Control             285,748 (3)   5,040(3)  290,788 
Upon Change-in-Control without Termination             285,748(3)  5,040(3)  290,788 
                         
Maria G. Frias                        
Upon Disability          $146,180(3) $2,880(3) $149,060 
Upon Death           146,180(3)  2,880(3)  149,060 
Upon Termination Following a Change-in-Control           146,180(3)  2,880(3)  149,060 
Upon Change-in-Control without Termination           146,180(3)  2,880(3)  149,060 
                         
H. Russell Holland, III                 $125,572(5)
  Term (in     Value of Other Annual  Total Value of Outstanding Stock  In-the-Money Value of Outstanding Stock Option  Total Value of 
Name years) (#)  Cash Severance ($)  Benefits ($)  Awards that Immediately Vest ($)  Awards or SARs that Immediately Vest ($)  Benefit ($) 
Dennis S. Hudson, III                        
Upon Termination without Cause or with Resignation for Good Reason(1)  2(2)  1,300,000   4,240         1,304,240 
Upon Death or Disability(1)  2(2)  1,100,000   4,240   2,269,070(3)  751,817(3)   4,125,127 
Upon Termination Following a Change-in-Control(1)  3   1,950,000   6,360   2,269,070(3)  751,817(3)   4,977,247 
Upon Change-in-Control without Termination           2,269,070(3)  751,817(3)   3,020,887 
Upon Change-in-Control where Award assumed by surviving entity           943,881(3)  277,830(3)   1,221,711 
Stephen A. Fowle                        
Upon Termination without Cause or with Resignation(4)     397,000   2,120   754,959   100,383   1,254,462 
Upon Death or Disability           900,070(3)   100,383(3)  1,000,453 
Upon Termination Following a Change-in-Control(5)  1   630,000   2,120   900,070   100,383   1,632,573 
Upon Change-in-Control without Termination           900,070(3)   100,383(3)   1,000,453 
Upon Change-in-Control where Award assumed by surviving entity           754,959(3)   (3)  754,959 
Charles K. Cross Jr.                        
Upon Death or Disability           1,102,956(3)   338,491(3)   1,441,447 
Upon Termination Following a Change-in-Control(6)  2   805,000   3,038   1,102,956   338,491   2,249,485 
Upon Change-in-Control without Termination           1,102,956(3)  338,491(3)  1,441,447 
Upon Change-in-Control where Award assumed by surviving entity           415,722(3)  106,614(3)  522,336 
David D. Houdshell                        
Upon Death or Disability           814,433(3)  246,063(3)  1,060,496 
Upon Termination Following a Change-in-Control(6)  1   338,333   1,991   814,433   246,063   1,400,820 
Upon Change-in-Control without Termination           814,433(3)  246,063(3)  1,060,496 
Upon Change-in-Control where Award assumed by surviving entity           393,308(3)  114,577(3)  507,885 
Charles M. Shaffer                        
Upon Death or Disability           935,476(3)  304,545(3)  1,240,021 
Upon Termination Following a Change-in-Control(6)  2   658,100   2,958   935,476   304,545   1,901,079 
Upon Change-in-Control without Termination           935,476(3)  304,545(3)  1,240,021 
Upon Change-in-Control where Award assumed by surviving entity           360,416(3)  106,614(3)  467,030 

77

 

(1)As provided for in Mr. Hudson’s employment agreement, the Bank would continue to pay to Mr. Hudson or his estate or beneficiaries his annual base salary, including any other cash compensation to which he would be entitled at termination date, for the period indicated under Term. In addition, the Bank would continue to pay the hospitalization insurance premium (including major medical) for Mr. Hudson, his spouse and eligible dependents as well as long-term disability and life insurance premiumsfor continued participation in any group medical, dental, vision and/or prescription drug plan benefits (including any excess COBRA cost of coverage) for the term indicated or until his earlier death. In the case of disability,termination without cause or resignation for good reason, Mr. Hudson’s severance for the Term also would include an amount equal to his highest annual base salary shallbonus for the previous three full fiscal years. In the case of termination without cause or resignation for good reason within twelve months following a change in control, severance payments would be reduced by any amounts received by Mr. Hudson under the Bank’s long term disability plan or from any other collateral source payable to disability, including social security benefits.made in a lump sum.

(2)The initial term of agreement is three years, with automatic renewal on each anniversary, but benefits under the agreement are paid for the Term as indicated in the table.

 

(3)As provided for in the award agreement and/document. Starting with awards granted in January 2015, there is no vesting of equity in a change in control if the award is assumed by the surviving entity or plan document.otherwise equitably converted or substituted.

 

(4)As provided for in the respectiveTransition Agreement with Mr. Fowle described above, which became effective on February 10, 2017. Mr. Fowle’s last day with the Company was March 31, 2017, terminating the payments which would be made under the Change in Control Agreement and triggering payment as provided under the Transition Agreement.

(5)As provided for change in control agreement, the Company shall pay the executive officer in a lump sum in cash within thirty (30) days after the date of termination the aggregate of the: (i) base salary through the termination date to the extent not paid (assumed already paid in table above), (ii) annual bonus (prorated in the event that the executive was not employed by the Company for the whole of such fiscal year), and (iii) annual base salary and annual bonus, multiplied by the Term as indicated in the table. Annual base salary is equal to 12 times the highest monthly base salary paid or payable, including any base salary which has been earned but deferred, to the executive officer by the Company in the 12-month period immediately preceding the month in which the triggering event occurs. Annual bonus is equal to the executive officer’s highest annual bonus for the last three full fiscal years prior to the triggering event. All unvested stock options and restricted stock of the Company held by the executive officer shall immediately and fully vest on termination. In addition, for the Term indicated, the Company will pay or provide to the executive officer or eligible dependents “Other Annual Benefits.” “Other Annual Benefits” include Company-paid profit-sharing contributions,with similar medical, prescription, dental, employee life, group life, accidental death and travel accidentvision insurance plans and programsbenefits paid by the Company prior to the change in control. If the executive officer’s employment is terminated by reason of death, disability, retirement or for cause within the term indicated following a change in control, no further payment is owed to the executive except for accrued obligations, such as earned but unpaid salary and bonus.

  

(5)(6)Mr. Holland served as anAs provided for in the respective change in control agreement, the Company shall pay the executive officer in a lump sum in cash within thirty (30) days after the date of termination the Bank and Companyaggregate of the: (i) base salary through July 19, 2013. As described under “Employment and Changethe termination date to the extent not paid (assumed already paid in Control Agreements – Former Executive Officer Agreement” above, Mr. Holland’s employment agreementtable above), (ii) annual bonus (prorated in the event that theexecutive was terminated pursuant to a separation agreement, which accelerated the vesting of 55,810 shares (or 11,162 shares after adjusting for the Company’s reverse stock split that took effect on December 13, 2013) of restricted stock granted to Mr. Hollandnot employed by the Company but did not provide any severance to Mr. Holland. The amount listedfor the whole of such fiscal year), and (iii) annual base salary and annual bonus, multiplied by the Term as indicated in the table representstable. Annual base salary is equal to 12 times the valuehighest monthly base salary paid or payable, including any base salary which has been earned but deferred, to the executive officer by the Company in the 12-month period immediately preceding the month in which the triggering event occurs. Annual bonus is equal to the executive officer’s average annual bonus for the last three full fiscal years prior to the triggering event. All unvested stock options and restricted stock of the restricted stockCompany held by the executive officer shall immediately and fully vest on the date of vesting and is also reported in the 2013 Option Exercises and Stock Vested Table.

On July 10, 2013,termination. In addition, the Company will pay or provide to the executive officer or eligible dependents “Welfare Benefits”, for a period of 18 months for Messrs. Cross and Shaffer and 1 year for Mr. Holland also entered intoHoudeshell. “Welfare Benefits” include similar medical, prescription, dental, and vision insurance plans benefits paid by the Company prior to the change in control. If the executive officer’s employment is terminated by reason of death, disability, retirement or for cause within the term indicated following a consulting agreement which provided that he would perform certain serviceschange in exchangecontrol, no further payment is owed to the executive except for consulting payments equal to $26,320 per month, plus reimbursement of reasonable business expenses. The consulting agreement hadaccrued obligations, such as earned but unpaid salary a term of six months and included covenants relating to non-disclosure of the Company’s confidential information. The amount paid to Mr. Holland under this agreement is included in the “All Other Compensation” column of the 2013 Summary Compensation Table.nd bonus.

 

5078

PROPOSAL 1

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

General

Seacoast views talent as our primary competitive advantage. Our talent focus starts with our non-employee directors, the individuals appointed to act on behalf of shareholders by overseeing critical aspects of our business strategy, operations, risk management and governance efforts. Our belief is that superior talent in the board room will generate exceptional levels of customer service, financial performance and, ultimately, superior shareholder returns compared to alternative investments. To this end, the Board is committed to identifying the best available talent to make meaningful contributions to our business and fully execute its duties and responsibilities on behalf of shareholders. The profile of our Board continues to evolve in response to the needs of a dynamic and growing organization. Our Board of Directors plays a meaningful role in helping Seacoast develop, test and implement our business, risk management, talent and reward strategies. The Board’s activities are focused on representing our shareholders in ways that position Seacoast to create significant value for customers, employees and our shareholders within a risk appropriate framework.

As of the date of this proxy statement, Seacoast’s Board of Directors consists of fourteen members divided into three classes, serving staggered three year terms as provided in our Articles of Incorporation.

The Annual Meeting is being held to, among other things, elect four Class III directors of Seacoast, each of whom has been nominated by the CGC of the Board of Directors. All of the nominees, except Alvaro J. Monserrat, are presently directors of Seacoast. All of the nominees also serve as members of the Board of Directors of Seacoast National Bank (the “Bank”). The members of the Boards of Directors of the Bank and the Company are the same except for Dale M. Hudson and Alvaro J. Monserrat, who are currently directors of the Bank only. If elected, each Class III director nominee will serve a three year term expiring at the 2020 Annual Meeting and until their successors have been elected and qualified.

 79

 

On January 31, 2017, the Board of Directors, following the recommendation of the CGC, nominated Alvaro J. Monserrat to stand for election at the Annual Meeting, replacing T. Michael Crook who intends to retire from the Company’s Board as of the Annual Meeting. Mr. Crook will remain on the board of directors of the Bank. Mr. Monserrat has served as a director of the Bank since January 2017.

Currently, the Board of Directors is classified as follows:

ClassTermName of Directors
Class ITerm Expires at the 2018Annual Meeting

Jacqueline L. Bradley

H. Gilbert Culbreth, Jr.

Christopher E. Fogal

Timothy S. Huval

Herbert A. Lurie

Class IITerm Expires at the 2019Annual Meeting

Dennis J. Arczynski

Maryann Goebel

Roger O. Goldman

Dennis S. Hudson, Jr.

Thomas E. Rossin

Class IIITerm Expires at the 2017Annual Meeting

Stephen E. Bohner

T. Michael Crook*

Julie H. Daum

Dennis S. Hudson, III

*Will be replaced by Alvaro J. Monserrat, if elected at the Annual Meeting.

2013 DIRECTOR COMPENSATIONManner for Voting Proxies

All shares represented by valid proxies, and not revoked before they are exercised, will be voted in the manner specified therein. If a valid proxy is submitted but no vote is specified, the proxy will be votedFOR the election of each of the four nominees for election as directors. Please note that banks and brokers that do not receive voting instructions from their clients are not able to vote their client’s shares in the election of directors. Although all nominees are expected to serve if elected, if any nominee is unable to serve, then the persons designated as proxies will vote for the remaining nominees and for such replacements, if any, as may be nominated by the CGC. Proxies cannot be voted for a greater number of persons than the number of nominees specified herein (four persons). Cumulative voting is not permitted.

The affirmative vote of the holders of shares of common stock representing a plurality of the votes cast at the Annual Meeting at which a quorum is present is required for the election of the directors listed below. However, to provide shareholders with a meaningful role in uncontested director elections, which is the case for the election of the director nominees listed below, our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that if any director nominee receives a greater number of votes “withheld” for his or her election than votes “for” such election, then the director will promptly tender his or her resignation to the Board following certification of the shareholder vote, with such resignation to be effective upon acceptance by the Board of Directors. The CGC would then review and make a recommendation to the Board of Directors as to whether the Board should accept the resignation, and the Board would ultimately decide whether to accept the resignation. The Company will disclose its decision-making process regarding any resignation in a Form 8-K filed with the SEC. In contested elections, the required vote would be a plurality of votes cast and the resignation policy would not apply. Further details of this policy and the corresponding procedures are set forth in our Corporate Governance Guidelines, available on our website at www.SeacoastBanking.com.

80

The four nominees have been nominated by Seacoast’s Compensation and Governance Committee, and the Board of Directors unanimously recommends a vote “FOR” the election of all four nominees listed below.

Nominees for Election at the Annual Meeting

 

Stephen E. Bohner, age 64, is a member of the Enterprise Risk Management Committee, chairman of the Bank’s Directors Credit Risk Committee and has been a director of Seacoast since 2003.  

Mr. Bohner has been president and owner of Premier Realty Group, a real estate company located in Sewall’s Point, Florida, specializing in the sale of luxury homes, since 1987.

In addition to his 39 years of experience in real estate, Mr. Bohner is actively involved in several professional and community organizations, having served as president of the Greater Martin County Association of Realtors and The Pine School. He was awarded the Realtor Association’s Distinguished Service Award in 2001, and has served on numerous professional standards’ panels in arbitration hearings and chaired the Realtors Association’s grievance committee. Mr. Bohner is a graduate of Vanderbilt University with dual degrees in Business and Economics.

In making the determination that Mr. Bohner should be a nominee for director of Seacoast, the CGC considered these qualifications and his qualification as an independent director, as well as:

·his business leadership and expertise in real estate, which provides the Board of Directors with valuable insight related to local real estate markets in which the Bank’s customers are located and helps the Board make critical judgments regarding the Bank’s lending activities since such judgments rely upon the proper valuation of real estate;

·his business leadership and entrepreneurial and management skills developed over the past 39 years;

·his stature in the local community garnered from his years of professional and community involvement; and

·his experience with the Company.

81

 

Julie H. Daum, age 62, is a member of the Compensation and Governance Committee and has been a director of Seacoast since 2013.  

Ms. Daum has been a senior director of Spencer Stuart, a privately-held global executive search firm, since 1993. As co-head of the North American Board and CEO Practice at Spencer Stuart, she has helped place over 1,000 directors on corporate boards, including the boards of Coach, Delta Air Lines, American Express, CVS Caremark, General Motors and Amazon.

 

Prior to July 1, 2013, non-employeeher work at Spencer Stuart, Ms. Daum was the executive director of the corporate board resource at Catalyst, where she managed all board of directors’ activities and worked with companies to identify qualified women for their boards. A widely renowned expert on corporate governance topics, Ms. Daum was recognized by the National Association of Corporate Directors (“NACD”) as one of the top 100 most influential leaders in corporate governance in 2013. Ms. Daum also advises corporate boards on succession planning for themselves and their CEOs, as well as best practices and governance issues. Each year, Ms. Daum develops the Spencer Stuart Board Index, a publication detailing trends at national boardrooms. She also co-founded and developed a program for board members entitled “Fresh Insights and Best Practices for Directors” at the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania, where she earned her MBA.

In making the determination that Ms. Daum should be a nominee for director of Seacoast, the CGC considered these qualifications and her qualification as an independent director, as well as:

·her expertise in recruiting, human resources and corporate governance, which provides valuable insights to help the Board make key decisions on director talent and governance matters;

·her associations in the Florida market and her understanding of public, private and not-for-profit boards which is useful for the Board’s consideration of alternative practices;

·her stature in the corporate governance community garnered from her years of professional involvement; and

·her ability to serve as a mentor and catalyst to bring more women into senior leadership positions with the Company.

82

 

Dennis S. Hudson, III, age 61, serves as Chairman of the Boardand has been a director of Seacoast since 1984.  

Mr. Hudson was named Chairman of Seacoast in July 2005, and has served as Chief Executive Officer of the Company since June 1998. Mr. Hudson has also served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Bank since 1992. He was President of Seacoast from June 1998 to July 2005, after serving in various positions with the Company and the Bank since 1978.

Mr. Hudson also serves on the board of directors, the audit committee and the compensation committee of Chesapeake Utilities Corporation (ticker: CPK), a public gas and electric utilities company headquartered in Dover, Delaware. Prior to that time, he served as a member of the board of directors of FPU. In November 2015, Mr. Hudson was appointed as an independent director to PENN Capital Funds, a mutual fund group managed by PENN Capital Management. From 2005 through 2010, he also served as a member of the board of directors of the Company orMiami Branch of the Federal Reserve Bank were paid an annual retainer of $23,000Atlanta.

Mr. Hudson is actively involved in the community, having served on the boards of the Martin County YMCA Foundation, Council on Aging, The Pine School, the Job Training Center, American Heart Association, Martin County United Way, the Historical Society of Martin County and as chairman of the board of the Economic Council of Martin County, on which he still serves. He has been recognized for theirhis achievements with several awards including the Florida Senate Medallion of Excellence Award presented by Florida Senator Ken Pruitt in 2001. Mr. Hudson is a graduate of Florida State University with a Bachelor’s degree in Finance, and a Master’s degree in Business Administration.

In making the determination that Mr. Hudson should be a nominee for director of Seacoast, the CGC considered these qualifications, as well as:

·his significant experience in the financial services industry and the organization, including his service as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, which provides a unique understanding of our operations;

·his knowledge and relationships with the institutional investor community, including the Company’s past and present institutional investors;

·his service on other public company boards, which provides insight regarding general public company operations, policies, internal controls and corporate governance, which is useful and applicable to Seacoast; and

·his stature in the local community, including through service on the boards of the non-profit organizations discussed above.

83

 

Alvaro J. Monserrat, age 48, was elected as a director of the Bank in January 2017 and is a member of the Strategy and Innovation Committee.  

Mr. Monserrat became CEO of RES Software, a leading digital workspace technology company in April 2015, after serving as Citrix Systems’ senior vice president of worldwide sales & service from July 2008 to 2015. Mr. Monserrat’s career spans more than 25 years in large companies and entrepreneurial ventures within enterprise software, mobility, cloud, networking and business strategy.

At Citrix, Monserrat was part of the executive leadership team that grew the company from hundreds of millions to more than $3 billion in revenue by 2014, and was instrumental in crafting the strategy that helped Citrix grow from a single-product company to a multi-product industry leader. Prior to joining Citrix, Mr. Monserrat was a principal in Innovex Group (acquired by Citrix) and received numerous awards including Microsoft’s Best E-Commerce Solution and Best Small Business Solution Awards. In addition, Mr. Monserrat has served on the board of advisors for Virsto and Whiptail (2010 to 2013), the national partner board of the Leukemia and Lymphoma Society (2008-2009) and on the board of the Children’s Harbor Society. Mr. Monserrat holds a Masters of Business Administration degree from the University of Texas at Austin and a Bachelor of Science degree in Computer Science from the University of Miami.

In making the determination that Mr. Monserrat should be a nominee for director of Seacoast, the CGC considered these qualifications and his qualification as an independent director, as well as:

·his entrepreneurial vision, innovation and resourcefulness in taking an initiative from concept to a successful money-making enterprise, which is applicable to our changing business model;

·his abilities as a change leader in transforming and infusing existing business models with multi-directional and diversified routes to market, delivering rapid growth, which provides insights for our effective management of Seacoast’s growth and transformation;

·his experience and acumen in building, restructuring and motivating teams to produce high-performing units; and

·his global view of markets and competitors combined with his knowledge of technology and go-to-market execution which provides constructive oversight in these areas.

84

Directors Whose Terms Extend Beyond the Annual Meeting

 

Dennis J. Arczynski, age 65, is the chairman of the EnterpriseRisk Management Committee, is a member of the Audit Committee and the Strategy and Innovation Committee, and has been a director of the Company since 2013 and a director of the Bank since 2007.  

Mr. Arczynski has been a risk management, corporate governance, regulatory affairs and banking consultant since 2007. He previously served for 33 years in various managerial and examiner positions in the U.S. Office of the Comptroller of the Currency’s (the “OCC”) headquarters in Washington, D.C. and in several other OCC districts until 2007.

As a National Bank Examiner with the OCC, Mr. Arczynski was responsible for the supervision and examination of the largest and most complex mid-size banks, community banks and trust companies; provided guidance to banks in all facets of commercial banking and fiduciary operations including international activities; performed risk assessment and conducted BSA/AML reviews and examinations of internationally active banks; and developed formal enforcement actions and corrective action plans for struggling and deficient institutions. Mr. Arczynski’s other positions of responsibility with the OCC were Assistant Director for Trust Operations, Special Assistant to the Senior Deputy Comptroller (FFIEC Liaison), Associate Director for Financial Management (Financial Systems and Review) and Field Office Manager (Miami Field Office). His duties included the formation of national policies and programs, development of OCC supervisory initiatives, establishment of interagency relations, drafting regulations and writing OCC examiner handbooks. Mr. Arczynski received his Bachelor’s degree from University of Maryland in Finance and his Master’s degree from Johns Hopkins University.

In making the determination that Mr. Arczynski should remain a director of Seacoast, the CGC considered these qualifications and his qualification as an independent director, as well as:

·his knowledge of the most effective management practices of the largest and most complex mid-size banks;

·his expertise in all facets of commercial banking and fiduciary operations, including risk assessment and BSA/AML;

·his risk management, corporate governance, and regulatory background specific to the financial services industry; and

·his public service which provides the Board of Directors with an alternative perspective in the areas of government relations and regulatory matters that impact the Company.

85

 

Jacqueline L. Bradley, age 59, is chairman of the Bank’s TrustCommittee, is a member of the Strategy and Innovation Committee, has been a director of the Company since May 2015 and a director of the Bank since October 2014.  

Ms. Bradley served as a director of BankFIRST from April 2005 until BANKshares was acquired by Seacoast on October 1, 2014. During her tenure at BankFIRST, she served on BankFIRST’s Special Assets Committee and Audit Committee. Ms. Bradley has served on the Orange County Tourist Development Council since 2010.

Ms. Bradley served on the finance committee for the Central Florida Expressway Authority from 2012 to 2013 and on the board of directors of the Company and its subsidiaries. In additionGreater Orlando Aviation Authority from 2000 to the annual retainer, non-employee directors received $700 for each Board meeting attended, $700 for each committee meeting attended and $800 for each committee meeting chaired, including Bank committees. The members2009. She is also a member of the Audit Committeeboard of directors of the Boys & Girls Club of Central Florida (since 1998), serving as chairperson in 2002 and Compensation2003, and Governance Committeea member of the boards of the Studio Museum in Harlem (since 2006) and The Lawrenceville School in Lawrenceville, New Jersey (since 2008). Ms. Bradley provides support to charities throughout the Central Florida community, and has served on the boards of the Florida Arts Council (2003-2008) and the Cornell Museum of Fine Arts. Ms. Bradley has had a 20 year career in financial services, including seven years with SunTrust Bank in Central Florida, culminating in her last position as senior vice president leading its Private Client Group (1999-2002). Her previous experience also includes eight years as vice president with Moody’s Investors Services and 3 years providing consulting services for McKinsey Management Consultants and Touché Ross. Ms. Bradley received an additional $100 for eachher Bachelor of these committee meetings attendedArts degree in Economics and $200 for eachPolitical Science from Yale College, and her Master’s degree in Business Administration from Columbia University Graduate School of these committee meetings chaired.Business with a concentration in Finance and Marketing.

 

Effective July 1, 2013,Ms. Bradley’s appointment to the Board of Directors amendedis pursuant to the Merger Agreement under which BANKshares merged with and into Seacoast. Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, Seacoast was required to appoint one former BANKshares’ director to our Board of Directors.

In making the determination that Ms. Bradley should remain a director of Seacoast, the CGC considered these qualifications and her qualification as an independent director, as well as:

·her diversity of management experience in the financial services industry;

·her knowledge of, and stature and philanthropic service to, the Central Florida market, which is valuable in understanding the customer segments in this market; and

·her ability to provide guidance to the Board of Directors regarding accounting and financial matters.

86

 

H. Gilbert Culbreth, Jr., age 71, is chairman of the Company’s Compensation and Governance Committee and has been a director of Seacoast since 2008.  

Mr. Culbreth has been chief executive officer and owner of Gilbert Chevrolet Company, Inc., a car dealership located in Okeechobee, Florida, for over 40 years. He also owns and manages Gilbert Ford, another car dealership in Okeechobee, Florida. Mr. Culbreth was previously a member of Big Lake Financial Corporation’s (“Big Lake”) board of directors for 10 years prior to the acquisition of Big Lake by Seacoast in April 2006, and has served on the Bank’s board of directors since the acquisition.

In addition, Mr. Culbreth is president of several other family businesses, including: Culbreth Realty, Inc. (a real estate brokerage company), Parrott Investments, Inc. (a holding company for two other businesses), Gilbert Cattle Co., LLC (a cattle operation), Grace Marine (a watercraft sales company), Gilbert Aviation Inc. (an aircraft sales and service company), Gilbert Oil Company, LLC and Gilbert Trucking, Inc. Mr. Culbreth is a former director of the Florida Council on Economic Education, the Okeechobee County Board of Realtors, the Okeechobee Economic Council, and the United Way of Okeechobee and is a member of the Masonic Lodge.

In making the determination that Mr. Culbreth should remain a director of Seacoast, the CGC considered these qualifications and his qualification as an independent director, as well as:

·his diversity of business experience for more than 40 years in the Okeechobee, Florida market, which is valuable in understanding the customer segments in this market;

·his entrepreneurial and management skills;

·his stature in and knowledge of the local community; and

·his experience with the Company.

87

 

Christopher E. Fogal, age 65, is chairman of the Company’s Audit Committee and has been a director of Seacoast since 1997.  

Mr. Fogal is a certified public accountant and a partner with the public accounting firm of Carr, Riggs & Ingram, LLC (“Carr Riggs”), a top 25 firm that is the second largest super-regional in the southeastern U.S. He was previously a principal with the public accounting firm of Proctor, Crook, Crowder & Fogal, P.A. (“Proctor Crook”), a BDO affiliate firm, located in Stuart, Florida, from 2009 to January 31, 2017 when the firm merged with Carr Riggs.

Mr. Fogal was the managing partner of Fogal & Associates from 1979 until the firm merged with Proctor Crook in 2009. He also served on the board of directors of Port St. Lucie National Bank until it was acquired by Seacoast in 1996. Currently, Mr. Fogal is treasurer of the St. Lucie County Economic Development Council. He has also served as past chairman of the Treasure Coast Private Industry Council and past president of the St. Lucie County Chamber of Commerce, and is active in a number of professional organizations including the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and the Florida Institute of Certified Public Accountants.

In making the determination that Mr. Fogal should remain a director of Seacoast, the CGC considered these qualifications and his qualification as an independent director, as well as:

·his accounting expertise as a Certified Public Accountant (“CPA”) for over 40 years, including audits of public companies regulated by the SEC, which provides the Board of Directors with guidance related to internal controls and financial and accounting matters;

·his business, management and decision-making skills, including his experience as managing partner of an accounting firm for 30+ years;

·his stature and knowledge of the local community; and

·his experience with the Company.

88

 

Maryann Goebel, age 66, is a member of the Company’s Audit Committee, Compensation and Governance Committee, and Enterprise Risk Management Committee, and has been a director of Seacoast since February 2014.  

Ms. Goebel has been an independent IT management consultant since 2012. She was executive vice president and chief information officer of Fiserv, Inc. (NASDAQ: FISV) from 2009 to July 2012. In this role, she was responsible for all internal Fiserv IT systems (infrastructure and applications), as well as IT infrastructure, operations, engineering and middleware services for Fiserv clients who chose to outsource the processing of their Fiserv applications.

In her 40+ year career, Ms. Goebel has shaped the strategic direction of information technology for major corporations around the world, serving in the critical role of chief information officer for: DHL Express from 2006 to 2009; General Motors North America from 2003 to 2006; General Motors Europe from 1999 to 2001; General Motors Truck Group from 1997 to 1999; Bell Atlantic NYNEX Mobile (now Verizon Mobile) from 1995 to 1997; and Frito-Lay from 2001 to 2002. She has also held senior IT leadership positions at Texas Instruments, Inc., Aérospatiale Helicopter Corporation, and the Southland Corporation, among others. Ms. Goebel received the “100 Leading Women in the North American Auto Industry” award in 2005. She also received an award for outstanding professional achievement from her alma mater, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, where she earned a Bachelor of Science degree in mathematics and currently serves on their Arts and Sciences Advisory Board.

In making the determination that Ms. Goebel should remain a director of Seacoast, the CGC considered these qualifications and her qualification as an independent director, as well as:

·her knowledge of complex information technology environments and focus on innovation;

·her expertise in strategizing and implementing best-practice processes, tools and structure that are essential to supporting a superior customer experience;

·her extensive experience in aligning IT objectives with corporate priorities; and

·her leadership and ability to help transform Seacoast into an organization that uses technology to deliver state-of-the-art customer services.

89

 

Roger O. Goldman, age 72, has been the Board’s LeadIndependent Director since November 2012 and a director of Seacoast since February 2012.

Mr. Goldman was appointed Chairman of American Express Bank FSB, a federally chartered savings bank located in Salt Lake City, Utah (“AEBFSB”) in September 2016. Prior to this, he was Lead Independent Director since January 2015 and chairman of AEBFSB’s Audit and Risk Committee since September 2005. Mr. Goldman has been a director of AEBFSB since 2005, and presently serves on its Compliance Committee, Audit & Risk Committee and Executive Committee.

In addition, Mr. Goldman is President and managing partner of Berkshire Opportunity Fund, which he founded in 2008 to provide financing and mentoring for small businesses in the Northeast. From 2009 to 2010, Mr. Goldman served as temporary volunteer CEO for 1Berkshire to create a powerful economic development engine for the Berkshires by integrating the work of four primary economic development agencies and raising larger and more sustainable funding. From 1997 to 2000, Mr. Goldman was president and chief executive officer of Global Sourcing Services, LLC, a start-up venture specializing in outsourced marketing services and account acquisition and customer retention programs, which he grew to a substantial size before it was sold.

Mr. Goldman’s extensive banking experience also includes management positions at Citicorp from 1969 to 1983; service as president and chief executive officer of Redwood Bank, a community bank in San Francisco, California, from 1983 to 1986; executive vice president and senior operating officer of Coreast Savings Bank from 1989 to 1991; and executive vice president in charge of the community banking group of NatWest Bancorp (with $31 billion in assets) from 1991 to 1996 where he was responsible for managing all consumer and small business activities. In addition, he previously served on the boards of several public and private corporations, including Minyanville (a new media company), Cyota (an Internet security company), and American Express Centurion Bank, where he also served as a member of the audit committee. He is Chairman Emeritus of the Lighthouse International, a charitable foundation for the visually impaired which is headquartered in New York, and is the former Chairman of the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation. Mr. Goldman received his Bachelor’s degree from New York University in Marketing and his Juris Doctorate from the Washington College of Law at American University. He is an emeritus member of the New Jersey bar and former member of the Washington D.C. bar.

In making the determination that Mr. Goldman should remain a director of Seacoast, the CGC considered these qualifications and his qualification as an independent director, as well as:

·his diversity of leadership experience in the financial services industry, particularly with respect to his retail banking and consumer and small business lending background;
·his marketing and risk management expertise;
·his legal background and knowledge of corporate governance matters;
·his considerable insights and perspectives garnered from years of service on public, private and not-for-profit boards; and
·the improved performance and effectiveness of the Board under his leadership as Lead Independent Director.

90

 

Dennis S. Hudson, Jr., age 89, is a member of the Enterprise Risk Management Committee and has been a director of Seacoast since 1983.

Mr. Hudson retired in June 1998 after a 48-year career with the Company and Bank. He served as Chairman of the Board of Seacoast from 1990 to June 1998. Prior thereto, he served as Chief Executive Officer of Seacoast from 1983 until 1992, President of Seacoast from 1983 until 1990 and Chairman of the Bank from 1969 until 1992.

Mr. Hudson also served on the board of the Miami Branch of the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta from 1983 to 1985. Active in the community and with charitable organizations, he has served as chairman of the American Red Cross of Martin County, president of the Stuart Rotary, and as a director of Hospice of Martin County.

In making the determination that Mr. Hudson should remain a director of Seacoast, the CGC considered these qualifications, as well as:

·his significant experience in the financial services industry and the organization, including his prior service as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, which provides a unique understanding of our operations;
·his tenure as director that spans a full range of banking and economic cycles affecting the Company; and
·his stature in the local community, including the leadership positions with the community organizations discussed above.

91

Timothy Huval, age 50, is a member of the Strategy & Innovation Committee and has been a director of Seacoast since July 2016.

Mr. Huval is the Chief Human Resources Officer of Humana Inc., a leading health and well-being company, where he is responsible for all aspects of human resources and business services. He also serves as a member of the management team that is bringing about a cultural transformation at Humana focused on integrating its core values enterprise-wide.

Prior to joining Humana in January 2013, Mr. Huval served in multiple senior-level roles at Bank of America (BOA). Handpicked to solve critical business challenges at BOA, his roles included consumer service and operations executive (2011-2012), home loan servicing executive (2010-2011), chief operations officer and Delaware market president (2007-2010), human resources executive (2006-2007) and chief information officer for Global Wealth & Investment Management. He also served as chair of BOA’s Consumer Banking, Business Banking and Enterprise Client Coverage Diversity & Inclusion Business Council. Mr. Huval has also been involved with various non-profit and community boards, including Family and Children’s Place in Louisville, Delaware United Way, Peninsula Alliance for Economic Development, and Youth Homes, Charlotte, NC. Mr. Huval earned a Master’s degree in public administration from Brigham Young University, a Bachelor’s degree in marketing from Weber State and an associate degree in business management from Salt Lake Community College. He was also awarded an honorary doctorate in Humane Letters from Salt Lake Community College.

In making the determination that Mr. Huval should remain a director of Seacoast, the CGC considered these qualifications and his qualification as an independent director, as well as:

·his diverse background in human resources, information technology, consumer banking, and operational management, which provides a unique and holistic perspective;
·his experience in cultural transformation and integration of corporate values deep in the organization and business model, which is applicable to Seacoast’s rapidly changing business model;
·his understanding of technology as a platform for creating efficiencies and optimizing resources; and
·his significant experience in the financial services industry.

92

 

Herbert Lurie, age 56, is a member of the Strategy & Innovation Committee and has been a director of Seacoast since April 2016.

Mr. Lurie was Senior Managing Director and Chairman of the Financial Institutions Group of Guggenheim Securities from June 2011 to April 2016, and is now a senior advisor at the firm. Previously, he led the Global Financial Institutions Group at Merrill Lynch, which he helped found, and was a member of Merrill Lynch’s Global Investment Banking Management Committee.

Mr. Lurie has advised on numerous financial institution transactions world-wide, including Bank One Corp.’s merger with First Chicago Corp., and NationsBank Corp.’s merger with BankAmerica Corp. to form Bank of America. He began his Wall Street career as an M&A and securities attorney at Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP. Mr. Lurie also has also served on a number of philanthropic and corporate boards, including as Vice Chairman of the Board of the United States Equestrian Team, a Trustee of Princeton’s Eden Autism Institute and The Seeing Eye. Mr. Lurie holds a JD from the University of California at Berkeley, an MA in Clinical Psychology from Columbia University, and a dual BS in Finance and Economics from the University at Albany.

In making the determination that Mr. Lurie should remain a director of Seacoast, the CGC considered these qualifications, as well as:

·his expertise and unique insights in evaluating M&A and other strategic opportunities, which is useful in promoting Seacoast’s balanced growth strategy;
·his “rainmaking” ability with respect to fostering strategically beneficial relationships;
·his knowledge and perspective on the interests of various investor groups, which is insightful in considering the interests of all shareholders; and
·his extensive experience and stature in the investment banking community.

93

Thomas E. Rossin, age 83, is chairman of the Strategy and Innovation Committee, is a member of the Enterprise Risk Management Committee, and has been a director of Seacoast since 2004.

Mr. Rossin is a retired attorney in West Palm Beach, Florida, previously serving as management chairman with the firm of St. John, Rossin & Burr, PLLC from 1993 to 2016. He served as a Florida State Senator from 1994 to 2002, the last two years as minority leader, and was a candidate for Florida Lt. Governor in 2002.

Mr. Rossin founded Flagler National Bank in 1974, serving as president, chief executive officer and director and growing it to the largest independent bank in Palm Beach County with over $1 billion in assets. Forming The Flagler Bank Corporation, the holding company for Flagler National Bank, in 1983 and serving as president, chief executive officer and director, he took it public in 1984 and facilitated the acquisition of three financial institutions, until both Flagler National Bank and the holding company were sold in 1993 to SunTrust Bank. Prior thereto, Mr. Rossin was vice chairman and director of First Bancshares of Florida, Inc. after consolidating four banks under one charter, including First National Bank in Riviera Beach at which he served as president and chief executive officer. He has served as past president of the Community Bankers Association of Florida and Palm Beach County Bankers Association, and is currently a member of the Florida Bar Association. In March 2014, Mr. Rossin received the Exemplary Elected Official Award from the Forum Club of the Palm Beaches.

In making the determination that Mr. Rossin should remain a director of Seacoast, the CGC considered these qualifications and his qualification as an independent director, as well as:

·his legal background and, in particular, his knowledge of legal issues related to financial institutions and underlying corporate governance matters;
·his public service which, combined with his legal background, provides the Board of Directors with knowledge in the areas of government relations and regulatory matters that impact the Company;
·his significant experience in the financial services industry; and
·his experience with the Company.

94

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

Decisions regarding our non-employee director compensation program are approved by our full board of directors based on recommendations from the CGC. In making its recommendations, the CGC considers the director compensation policypractices of peer companies and terminated all meeting fees. Underwhether such recommendations align with the new policy, allinterests of our shareholders with respect to total compensation and each element thereof. Our compensation program for non-employee directors is designed to:

·appropriately compensate directors for the work required at a company of Seacoast’s size, growth, and dynamic and evolving business model;
·align directors’ interests with the long-term interests of Seacoast’s shareholders; and
·make meaningful adjustments every few years, rather than small annual adjustments.

At the direction of the Company orCGC, in January 2017, Grant Thornton analyzed the competitive position of Seacoast’s average director pay against the Core Bank are paid an annual retainerPeer Group used for executive compensation purposes (see “Benchmarking and Comparator Group” for information about the peer group), including how each element of $75,000director compensation compares to the group. Grant Thornton’s analysis showed that Seacoast’s average total compensation for their service asnon-employee directors ofwas above the Company and its subsidiaries. For Company directors, half of this annual retainer is paidpeer group median, but was more heavily weighted in cash, and the remaining half is paid in the form of an annual stock grant under the 2013 Incentive Plan. Directors of the Bank board may elect to receive a lesser portion of their annual retainer in the form of stock. The Chair of the Audit Committee receives an additional annual retainer of $15,000, and each of the Chairs of the Company’s and Bank’s other standing committees receives an additional annual retainer of $10,000 for each committee chaired. equity compensation.

Non-Employee Director Compensation Structure

Annual Retainer paid to All Non-employee Directors of the Company or the Bank:    
     
Cash(1) $37,500 
     
Stock Award(2) $37,500 
     
Annual Committee Chair Retainer for CGC and Bank Committees $10,000 
     
Annual Committee Chair Retainer for Audit & ERMC Committees $15,000 
     
Annual Committee Chair Retainer for S&I Committee $25,000 

(1)A number of directors have elected to receive all or a portion of their cash retainer in stock or stock options as described below.
(2)Granted under the 2013 Incentive Plan following election or reelection at each annual meeting of shareholders.

95

All cash retainers are paid in quarterly installments.

The equity To further align directors’ interests with long-term shareholder interests, directors may elect to receive: 1) all or a portion of the compensation earned by directorstheir annual cash retainer in 2013 was paid on March 18, 2014Company common stock, and 2) up to a maximum of 30% of their annual cash retainer in the form of non-qualified options to purchase shares of Company common stock (a new element added in 2016). Retainers are pro-rated for directors who join or leave the Board or have a fully vested stock grant. Since these awards were madechange in 2014, they are not shown below in the 2013 Director Compensation Table, but instead will be reflected in the 2014 Director Compensation Table contained in the Company’s 2015 proxy statement.Board role during a quarterly period.

 

Non-employee directors are also reimbursed for their travel, lodging and related expenses incurred in connection with attending board,Board, committee and shareholders meetings and other designated Company events. Executive officers who are also directors do not receive any compensation for services provided as a director.

 

Lead Independent Director Compensation & Agreement

 

UnderThe Board appointed Roger Goldman as Lead Independent Director in November 2012. Mr. Goldman’s compensation reflects the additional time commitment for this role compared to other non-employee directors, the enhanced credibility with the investment community his affiliation with Seacoast provides the Company, and the improved performance and effectiveness of the Board under his leadership. His significant role is more fully described under the section entitled “Board Leadership Structure”.

On March 1, 2014, the Company entered into a separate three-year agreement with Lead Independent Director Goldman which automatically renews for successive three-year terms on the Company which commenced on November 1, 2012,first day of each month following the effective date. Under the agreement, Lead Independent Director Roger O. Goldman receivedreceives an additional annual retainer of $275,000 for his service as Lead Independent Director, paid in a combination of cash, restricted stock and other stock-based awards as mutually agreed by the Company and the Lead Independent Director. Effective March 1, 2014,Upon signing of the Company entered into a new three-year agreement, with Lead Director Goldman which replaces the former agreement and automatically renews for successive three-year terms on the first day of each month following the effective date. Under the new agreement, Lead Director Goldman continues to receive an annual retainer of $275,000. Hehe also received a stock option to purchase 200,000 shares of Seacoast Common Stockcommon stock at an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the stock on the grant date.date ($10.78). The stock option vestsvested on a pro rata monthly basis frombeginning on March 1, 2014 to February 28, 2017. The stock option may become vested and exercisable as to one-half of the then-unvested shares in the event of Lead Director Goldman’s death or disability. In addition, the option will becomebecame fully vested and exercisable uponon February 28, 2017. In addition, under the earliest of (i) the occurrence of a change in control (as defined in the agreement), or (ii) the termination ofagreement, Lead Director Goldman’s continuous service, or status as Lead Director, by the Company for any reason (including any situation in which he is not re-elected to the Company’s Board or as Lead Director). Under both the 2012 and the 2014 agreements, LeadIndependent Director Goldman receives a $20,000 annual housing allowance, is provided with office space in a Company-owned facility, and is reimbursed for allcompany-related travel expenses, reasonable staffcustomer or customerstaff entertainment expenses and extraordinary use of his office staff.

Director Stock Ownership Policy

To align the interests of our directors and shareholders, our Board of Directors believes that directors should hold a significant financial stake in Seacoast. Consequently, our Corporate Governance Guidelines require that directors own Seacoast stock equal in value to a minimum of three times their base annual retainer within four years of joining the Board. Each director must retain 75% of their shares until reaching the minimum share ownership requirement, and after the ownership target is met, must retain at least 50% of the shares for one year. All of our directors own more than the minimum stock requirement, except for our three newest directors who have been on the Board for two years or less, and are on track to be compliant with our policy within the prescribed time frame.

96

The table below sets forth the total compensation paid to Board members who are not employees of the Company orof the Bank for fiscal year 2013.2016.

 

20132016 DIRECTOR COMPENSATION TABLE

 

Name Fees Earned or 
Paid in Cash
($)(1)
  All Other
Compensation
($)
  Total
($)
 
Director Fees Earned or
Paid in Cash ($)(1)
  Stock Awards
($)(2)
 Option Awards
($)(2)
 All Other
Compensation
($)
  Total ($) 
                    
Dennis J. Arczynski $62,350     $62,350   52,500(3)(4)  37,514         90,014 
Stephen E. Bohner $63,350     $63,350   47,500(3)(5)  37,514         85,014 
John H. Crane(2) $57,900     $57,900 
Jacqueline L. Bradley  45,000(3)(6)  37,514         82,514 
T. Michael Crook $47,650     $47,650   37,500(3)(7)  37,514         75,014 
H. Gilbert Culbreth, Jr. $63,650     $63,650   47,500(8)  37,514         85,014 
Julie H. Daum(3) $12,500     $12,500   37,500(3)(7)  37,514         75,014 
Christopher E. Fogal $67,450     $67,450   55,000(3)(9)  37,514         92,514 
Maryann Goebel(4) $     $   37,500(3)  37,514         75,014 
Roger O. Goldman $325,250(5) $20,000(6) $345,250   312,500(3)(7)(10)  37,514      20,000(11)  370,014 
Robert B. Goldstein $53,350(7)    $53,350 
Dale M. Hudson $47,050     $47,050 
Dennis S. Hudson, Jr. $48,450     $48,450   37,500   37,514         75,014 
Timothy S. Huval(11)  18,750(7)  18,765         37,515 
Herbert Lurie(11)  28,125(3)(7)  28,139      13,155(13)  69,419 
Thomas E. Rossin $64,250     $64,250   58,750(14)  37,514         96,264 
Edwin E. Walpole, III $41,350     $41,350 

 

(1)Certain directors elected to take a portion of their cash compensation in the form of non-qualified options to purchase shares of Company common stock. A breakdown of the fees earned or paid in cashoption awards made to each director in 2016 is provided below in the table “Director Fees Earned or Paidentitled “Stock Awards Granted to Directors in Cash”2016”.

 

(2)Mr. Crane retired from the Board of DirectorsA breakdown of the Company on July 16, 2013. He remains astock awards made to each director in 2016 is provided below in the table entitled “Stock Awards Granted to Directors in 2016”. No stock awards held by directors were outstanding as of the Bank.December 31, 2016.

 

(3)Ms. Daum wasCertain directors elected to the Board in September 2013 and receivedtake a pro rata portion of their 2016 cash compensation in the annual retainer for serviceform of stock option awards. As of December 31, 2016, all of the stock option awards described below in the table entitled “Stock Awards Granted to Directors in 2016” were outstanding, as director in 2013.well as 190,000 shares of the stock option held by Mr. Goldman described under “Lead Independent Director Agreement” above.

 

(4)Ms. Goebel was elected to the Board in February 2014 and accordingly received no compensationIncludes $15,000 for his service as a director in 2013.Chair of the ERMC.

 

(5)OfIncludes $10,000 for his service as Chair of the fees earnedBank’s Credit Review Committee.

97

(6)Includes $10,000 for her service as Chair of the Bank’s Wealth Committee.

(7)The table below shows the cash amounts that the directors deferred into the Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan (“DDCP”) described below in 2016 and the total number of shares held in the DDCP Seacoast Stock Account and Equity Deferral Account for each director as of the Record Date:

Director Cash Deferred
into DDCP
Stock Account in
2016 ($)
  Shares held in
DDCP Stock
Account as of
Record Date (#)
  Shares held in
DDCP Equity
Deferral
Account (#)
  Total Shares
held in DDCP
(#)
 
             
Dennis J. Arczynski     16,178   8,298   24,476 
Stephen E. Bohner     9,970   8,298   18,268 
Jacqueline L. Bradley        5,533   5,533 
T. Michael Crook  21,250   17,800   8,298   26,098 
H. Gilbert Culbreth, Jr.     414   8,298   8,712 
Julie H. Daum  26,251   4,561   8,298   12,859 
Christopher E. Fogal     627   8,298   8,925 
Maryann Goebel        8,002   8,002 
Roger O. Goldman  26,250   31,464   8,298   39,762 
Dennis S. Hudson, Jr.        8,298   8,298 
Timothy S. Huval        1,175   1,175 
Herbert Lurie  19,688   1,496   1,762   3,258 
Thomas E. Rossin        8,298   8,298 

(8)Includes $10,000 for his service as Chair of the CGC.

(9)Includes $15,000 for his service as Chair of the Audit Committee.

(10)Includes $275,000 for his service as Lead Independent Director.

(11)Housing allowance.

(12)Mr. Huval was elected to Seacoast’s Board in July 2016 and Mr. Lurie was elected to Seacoast’s Board in March 2016. Their compensation was prorated accordingly for 2016.

(13)Reimbursement by Mr. Goldman in 2013, $45,000 wasthe Company of medical insurance premiums.

(14)Includes $21,250 for his service as Chair of the Strategy and Innovation Committee.

98

STOCK AWARDS & OPTIONS GRANTED TO DIRECTORS IN 2016

The following table sets forth certain information concerning stock awards and options granted to directors during 2016. As of December 31, 2016, all stock awards granted to directors were fully vested, and all of the option awards listed below were outstanding, as well as 190,000 shares underlying the stock option held by Mr. Goldman described under “Lead Independent Director Agreement” above.

Name Grant Date Stock
Awards(1)
(#)
  Option Awards: Number
of Securities Underlying
Options(2) (#)
  Exercise or Base
Price of Option
Awards ($/Sh)
  Grant Date Fair
Value of Stock
and Option
Awards(3)($)
 
               
Dennis J. Arczynski 7/26/2016  2,349         37,514 
  2/3/2016     3,419   14.39   11,249 
Stephen E. Bohner 7/26/2016  2,349         37,514 
  2/3/2016     3,419   14.39   11,249 
Jacqueline L. Bradley 7/26/2016  2,349         37,514 
  2/3/2016     2,279   14.39   7,498 
T. Michael Crook 7/26/2016  2,349         37,514 
  2/3/2016     3,419   14.39   11,249 
H. Gilbert Culbreth, Jr. 7/26/2016  2,349         37,514 
Julie H. Daum 7/26/2016  2,349         37,514 
  2/3/2016     3,419   14.39   11,249 
Christopher E. Fogal 7/26/2016  2,349         37,514 
  2/3/2016     3,419   14.39   11,249 
Maryann Goebel 7/26/2016  2,349         37,514 
  2/3/2016     3,419   14.39   11,249 
Roger O. Goldman 7/26/2016  2,349         37,514 
  2/3/2016     3,419   14.39   11,249 
Dennis S. Hudson, Jr. 7/26/2016  2,349         37,514 
Timothy S. Huval 7/26/2016  1,175         18,765 
Herbert Lurie 7/26/2016  2,349         28,139 
  4/19/2016     2,244   16,47   8,437 
Thomas E. Rossin 7/26/2016  2,349         37,514 

(1)All of the shares were deferred into the Company’s Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan described below.

 

(6)(2)Housing allowance.Purchased with cash compensation and valued using Black Scholes model at $3.29 per share for all option awards, except Mr. Lurie’s which was valued at $3.76 per share.

 

(7)(3)80%Represents the aggregate grant date fair value as of the compensation earned by Mr. Goldstein as a director is paidrespective grant date for each award, calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. The assumptions made in valuing stock awards reported in this column are discussed in Note J to CapGen Capital Advisors LLC.the Company’s audited financial statements included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.

 

2013 DIRECTOR FEES EARNED OR PAID IN CASH

99

 

Name Retainer for
Service as
Director
($)
  Retainer for
Service as Lead
Director
($)
  Chair
Fees
($)
  Meeting
Fees
($)
  Total Fees 
Earned or Paid
in Cash
($)
 
Dennis J. Arczynski $30,250     $5,000  $27,100  $62,350 
Stephen E. Bohner $30,250     $5,000  $28,100  $63,350 
John H. Crane $39,000     $  $18,900  $57,900 
T. Michael Crook $30,250     $  $17,400  $47,650 
H. Gilbert Culbreth, Jr. $30,250     $5,000  $28,400  $63,650 
Julie H. Daum $12,500     $     $12,500 
Christopher E. Fogal $30,250     $12,500  $24,700  $67,450 
Maryann Goebel $     $       
Roger O. Goldman $30,250  $275,000  $  $20,000  $325,250 
Robert B. Goldstein $30,250     $5,000  $18,100  $53,350 
Dale M. Hudson $30,250     $  $16,800  $47,050 
Dennis S. Hudson, Jr. $30,250     $  $18,200  $48,450 
Thomas E. Rossin $30,250     $5,000  $29,000  $64,250 
Edwin E. Walpole, III $30,250     $  $11,100  $41,350 

 

Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan

 

The Company has a Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan (“DDCP”) to allow each non-employee director of the Company and the Bank to defer receipt of his director compensation, both cash and equity, until his separation from service with the Company. Each participant account is separated into sub-accounts for cash deferrals (“Cash Deferral Account”) and equity deferrals (“Equity Deferral Account”). Each participant directs how his accountCash Deferral Account in the Directors’ Deferred Compensation PlanDDCP is invested among the available investment vehicle options, including a Company stock fund (“Stock Account”). The plan’s investment options are reviewed and selected annually by a Committee appointed by the Board of Directors of the Company to administer the plan. No earnings or dividends paid under the Directors’ Deferred Compensation PlanDDCP are above-market or preferential.

 

All amounts paid under the plan are paid in cash from the general assets of the Company, either directly by the Company or via a “rabbi trust” the Company has established in connection with the plan. Nothing contained in the plan creates a trust or fiduciary relationship of any kind between the Company and a participant, beneficiary or other person having a claim to payments under the plan. A participant or beneficiary does not have an interest in his plan account that is greater than that of an unsecured creditor.

 

Upon a participant’s separation from service, the participant will receive the balance of his Stock Account and/or Equity Deferral Account in shares of Company Common Stockcommon stock and the balance of his other plan accounts in cash in one of the following three forms specified by the participant at the time of initial deferral election: i) a lump sum; ii) monthly installments over a period not to exceed five years; or iii) a combination of an initial lump sum of a specified dollar amount and the remainder in monthly installments over a period not to exceed five years.

·a lump sum;

·monthly installments over a period not to exceed five years; or

·a combination of an initial lump sum of a specified dollar amount and the remainder in monthly installments over a period not to exceed five years.

 

Upon death of a participant, any balance in his account shall be paid in a lump sum to his designated beneficiary or to his estate.

100

  

101

COMPENSATION AND GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE REPORTPROPOSAL 2

RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITOR

 The Audit Committee, acting pursuant to authority delegated to it by the Board of Directors, appointed Crowe Horwath LLP, an independent registered certified public accounting firm and the Company’s independent auditor for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2016, to serve as the Company’s independent auditor for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2017. Although it is not required to do so, the Board of Directors is submitting the Audit Committee’s appointment of Crowe Horwath LLP for ratification by the Company’s shareholders in order to ascertain the views of the shareholders regarding such appointment and as a matter of good corporate practice. If the shareholders should not ratify the appointment of Crowe Horwath LLP, the Audit Committee will reconsider the appointment.

Representatives of Crowe Horwath LLP will be present at the Annual Meeting and will be given the opportunity to make a statement on behalf of the firm, if they so desire, and will also be available to respond to appropriate questions from shareholders.

All shares represented by valid proxies received pursuant to this solicitation and not revoked before they are exercised will be voted in the manner specified therein. If no specification is made, the proxies will be voted for the ratification of the appointment of Crowe Horwath LLP for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2017.

Ratification of this proposal requires approval by the affirmative vote of a majority of votes cast at the Annual Meeting.

The Board of Directors unanimously recommends a vote “FOR” Proposal 2.

RELATIONSHIP WITH INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Crowe Horwath LLP’s report on Seacoast’s consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 did not contain an adverse opinion or a disclaimer of opinion, and was not qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope, or accounting principles. Crowe Horwath LLP’s report on Seacoast’s internal control over financial reporting expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016. Crowe Horwath LLP has advised Seacoast that neither the firm nor any of its partners has any direct or material interest in Seacoast and its subsidiaries except as auditors and independent certified public accountants of Seacoast and its subsidiaries.

102

Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm’s Fees

 

The Compensationfollowing table shows the fees paid or accrued by the Company for the audit and Governanceother services for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, including expenses:

  2016  2015 
       
Audit Fees(1) $548,591  $495,000 
Audit-Related Fees(2) $53,500  $108,750 
Tax Fees $12,000  $ 
All Other Fees(3) $10,087  $35,200 

(1)Includes the aggregate fees for professional services and expenses rendered for the audit of the Company’s consolidated financial statements, reviews of consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s Forms 10-Q filed during the respective fiscal year, and audit of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

(2)Includes the aggregate fees billed for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit of the Company’s financial statements and are not reported under “Audit Fees.” These services primarily relate to audits of the Company’s compliance with certain requirements applicable to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) assisted programs, and related attestation reporting thereon. Also includes the aggregate fees billed in 2015 for professional services performed in connection with the Company’s filing of certain registration statements and the related issuance of consents.

(3)Includes the aggregate fees for professional services and expenses rendered in connection with the audit of the Company’s retirement savings plan.

Pre-Approval Policy

Under the Audit Committee’s Charter, the Audit Committee assistsis required to approve in advance the Boardterms of Directorsall audit services provided to the Company as well as all permissible audit-related and non-audit services to be provided by the independent auditors. All services set forth above under the captions “Audit Fees”, “Audit-Related Fees”, “Tax Fees”, and “All Other Fees” were approved by the Company’s Audit Committee pursuant to SEC Regulation S-X Rule 2-.01(c)(7)(i).

103

PROPOSAL 3

ADVISORY (NON-BINDING) VOTE ON COMPENSATION OF 

NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

 In accordance with administering its responsibilities relatingthe Exchange Act, we are required to include in this Proxy Statement and present at the Annual Meeting a non-binding shareholder vote to approve the compensation of our named executive officers, as disclosed in this Proxy Statement pursuant to the compensation rules of the SEC. This Proposal, commonly known as a “say-on-pay” proposal, gives shareholders the opportunity to endorse or not endorse the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers includingas disclosed in this Proxy Statement. The Proposal will be presented at the chief executive officer. In addition, this Committee has overall responsibility for evaluating and approvingAnnual Meeting in the Company’s compensation plans, policies and programs. The Compensation and Governance Committee operates under a written charter that was last revised effective on November 19, 2013. The Committee Charter is available onform of the Company’s website atwww.seacoastbanking.net.following resolution:

 

In 2013,RESOLVED, that the Compensation and Governance Committee was composedholders of seven directors, eachcommon stock of whom was determined to be independent pursuant to a review by the Committee. The Committee also serves asCompany approve the compensation and governance committee of the Bank.

The Compensation and Governance Committee believes that it has taken the actions necessary and appropriate to fulfill its responsibilities under its charter. To carry out its responsibilities, the Committee held nine meetingsCompany’s named executive officers as disclosed in 2013.

In fulfilling its oversight responsibilities, the Compensation and Governance Committee reviewed with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, required as part of thisthe compensation tables and related material in the Company’s Proxy Statement includingfor the 2017 Annual Meeting.

This advisory vote will not be binding on the Company’s Board of Directors and may not be construed as overruling a discussion of the quality and the clarity of disclosures contained therein. Based on this review and discussion, the Compensation and Governance Committee recommended todecision by the Board of Directors thator creating or implying any additional fiduciary duty on the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy StatementBoard of Directors, nor will it affect any compensation paid or awarded to any executive. The CGC and the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K. Board of Directors will take into account the outcome of the vote when considering future executive compensation arrangements.

The purpose of our compensation policies and procedures is to attract and retain experienced, qualified talent critical to our long-term success and enhancement of shareholder value. Seacoast’s Board has approvedof Directors believes that our compensation policies and ratified such recommendation.procedures achieve this objective.

 

This report shall not be deemed to be “soliciting material” or to be “filed” withProposal 3 requires approval by the Securities Exchange Commission, nor shall this report be incorporated by reference by any general statement incorporating by reference this 2014 Proxy Statement into any filing underaffirmative vote of a majority of votes cast at the Securities ActAnnual Meeting.

The Board of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and shall not otherwise be deemed filed under such Acts.Directors unanimously recommends a vote “FOR” Proposal 3.

  

104

  

Compensation and Governance Committee:OTHER INFORMATION
 
 
H. Gilbert Culbreth, Jr., Co-ChairCertain Transactions and Business Relationships
 Robert B. Goldstein, Co-Chair
Stephen E. Bohner
Julie H. Daum
Christopher E. Fogal
Thomas E. Rossin
Edwin E. Walpole, IIIRELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS AND BUSINESS RELATIONSHIPS

Related Party Transactions

 

The Board of Directors recognizes that related party transactions present a heightened risk of conflicts of interest and/or improper valuation (or the perception thereof) and therefore has adopted a policyRelated Party Transaction Policy to guide the Company in connection with all related party transactions. The policy is available on the Company’s website at www.seacoastbanking.net.www.seacoastbanking.com. The Company defines a related party as:

 

·any employee, officer, director or director nominee of the Company and/or its subsidiaries;

·a shareholder (or group of affiliated shareholders) beneficially owning in excess of 5% of the Company (or its controlled affiliates);

·a shareholder (or group of affiliated shareholders) with the right to designate a director or board observer to the Board of Directors of the Company and/or any of its subsidiaries;

·an immediate family member of any of the foregoing; and

·an entity which is owned or controlled by someone listed above, or an entity in which someone listed above has a substantial ownership interest or control of such entity.

 

The policy requires the Audit Committee or a majority of disinterested members of the Board to approve or ratify a transaction between the Company and any related party (including any transactions requiring disclosure under Item 404 of Regulation S-K under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934), other than:

 

·transactions available on similar terms to all employees or customers generally;

·transactions involving less than $25,000 when aggregated with all similar transactions; and

·loans made by the Bank in the ordinary course of business, on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as, and following credit underwriting procedures that are not less stringent than, those prevailing at the time for comparable loans with parties not related to the lender, and not involving more than the normal risk of repayment or presenting other unfavorable features, and in compliance with applicable law, including the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 and Regulation O of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.

 

The Audit Committee is currently comprised of three directors, Christopher E. Fogal (Chair), T. Michael CrookDennis J. Arczynski and Maryann Goebel. Messrs. Fogal (Chairman), Culbreth and Crook were the members of the Audit Committee in 2013. None of the current or 2013 Audit Committee members is or has been an officer or employee of Seacoast or its subsidiaries and each is independent.

 

105

Director H. Gilbert Culbreth, Jr. is a controlling shareholder of Gilbert Ford, LLC, which furnished three new vehicles to the Bank in 2013 in exchange for payments totaling $76,714.

The disinterested members of the Audit Committee approved the acquisition of these goods and services. Seacoast believes the goods and services were commercially reasonableCompany enters into commercial dealings with certain related persons that it considers arms-length and comparable to similar transactions negotiated at arm’s lengthdealings between unrelated parties. Each such dealing is described below:

 

Director Dennis J. Arczynski is the principal and controlling shareholder of Dennis J. Arczynski & Co., LLP, which provided risk management and corporate governance consulting services to the Bank in 2011 totaling $274,525. Seacoast believes the services were commercially reasonable and comparable to similar transactions negotiated at arm’s length between unrelated parties.

·Director T. Michael Crook’s brother-in-law has a minority, non-controlling interest in Mayfair Plaza, which leases to the Bank 21,245 square feet of space adjacent to the Seacoast National Center in Stuart, Florida, pursuant to a lease agreement which expires in May 2017. The Bank paid rent of approximately $295,215 on this property in 2016, of which Mr. Crook’s brother-in-law’s individual interest was approximately $50,187.
·Director Timothy S. Huval is employed as Chief Human Resources Officer of Humana, Inc., a leading health and well-being company that provides group vision insurance to Seacoast. In 2016, Seacoast paid Humana approximately $69,243 in premiums. We believe Mr. Huval has no material direct or indirect interest in such arrangement.
·Director Herbert A. Lurie is a senior advisor of Guggenheim Securities that provides financial advisory services to Seacoast. In his capacity as senior advisor to the firm, Mr. Lurie may receive customary fees that are based in part on fees paid to Guggenheim Securities, depending on Mr. Lurie’s role in securing, working and dispatching the matter. In 2016, Seacoast paid Guggenheim Securities $83,333 for advisory services.

 

Director T. Michael Crook’s brother-in-law is a controlling shareholderThe Audit Committee has approved each of Mayfair Investments, which leases to the Bank 21,245 square feet of space adjacent to the Seacoast National Center in Stuart, Florida, pursuant to a lease agreement which expires in May 2014. The Bank paid rent of approximately $270,236 on this property in 2013, of which Mr. Crook’s brother-in-law’s individual interest was $45,940. Seacoast believes the terms of this lease are commercially reasonable and comparable to rental terms negotiated at arm’s length between unrelated parties for similar property in Stuart.these transactions.

Several of Seacoast’s directors, executive officers and their affiliates, including corporations and firms of which they are directors or officers or in which they and/or their families have an ownership interest, are customers of Seacoast and its subsidiaries. These persons, corporations and firms have had transactions in the ordinary course of business with Seacoast and its subsidiaries, including borrowings, all of which, in the opinion of Seacoast’s management and in accordance with the Bank’s written loan policy, were on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with unaffiliated persons and did not involve more than the normal risk of collectability or present other unfavorable features. Seacoast and its subsidiaries expect to have such transactions on similar terms with their directors, executive officers, and their affiliates in the future.

 

As a federally insured bank, the Bank is subject to Regulation O, which governs loans to “insiders”, defined as any executive officer, director or principal shareholder of the Company or the Bank, and their related interests. Regulation O limits loans to insiders and requires that the terms and conditions of credits granted to insiders are substantially the same as those extended to other customers of the Bank. The Bank’s written loan policy requires compliance with the provisions of Regulation O.

 

The aggregate amount of loans outstanding by the Bank to directors, executive officers, and related parties of Seacoast or the Bank as of December 31, 2013,2016, was approximately $4,770,918,$2,115,286, which represented approximately 2.4 percent0.49% of Seacoast’s consolidated shareholders’ equity on that date. These loans were made in the ordinary course of business and they did not involve more than the normal risk of collectability or present other unfavorable features.

 

106

Certain Family Relationships

CERTAIN FAMILY RELATIONSHIPS

  

Certain members of the Company’s Board of Directors and management are related. Director Dennis S. Hudson, Jr. and’s brother, Dale M. Hudson, are brothers.serves on the Bank’s board of directors. Dennis S. Hudson, III, the Company’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, is the son of Dennis S. Hudson, Jr. and the nephew of Dale M. Hudson. As an executive officer, Dennis S. Hudson, III’s compensation is approved by the Compensation and Governance Committee,CGC, which is comprised solely of independent directors.

 

COMPENSATION AND gOVERNANCE COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS
AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION

During 2013, Messrs. Culbreth (Co-Chairman), Goldstein (Co-Chairman), Bohner, Fogal, Rossin and Walpole served as members of the Compensation and Governance Committee. Ms. Daum joined the Committee in November 2013. None of the Compensation and Governance Committee members is or has been an officer or employee of Seacoast or its subsidiaries, and each is independent for executive compensation purposes. During 2013, none of the members of the Compensation and Governance Committee had any relationship with the Company requiring disclosure under Item 404 of Regulation S-K. None of our executive officers served as a member of the Board of Directors or compensation committee, or similar committee, of any other company whose executive officer(s) served as a member of our Board of Directors or our Compensation and Governance Committee.

Security Ownership of Management
and Certain Beneficial Holders

The tables below provides information regarding the beneficial ownership of the Common Stock as of March 20, 2014 (the Record Date), by:

·each of the Company’s directors;

·each of the executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table;

·all directors and executive officers as a group; and

·each beneficial owner of more than 5%.

As of March 20, 2014, 25,985,761 shares of Common Stock were outstanding. Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with SEC rules and regulations. Unless otherwise indicated, and subject to community property laws where applicable, the Company believes that each of the shareholders named in the tables below has sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares indicated as beneficially owned. Some of the information in the tables is based on information included in filings made by the beneficial owners with the SEC.

Principal Shareholders (5% Owners Exclusive of Directors and Officers)

The following table sets forth information regarding the number and percentage of shares of Common Stock held by all persons and entities known by the Company to beneficially own 5% or more of the Company’s outstanding Common Stock. The information regarding beneficial ownership of Common Stock by the entity identified below is included in reliance on a report filed by the entity with the SEC, except that the percentage is based upon the Company’s calculations made in reliance upon the number of shares reported to be beneficially owned by the entity in such report and the number of shares of common stock outstanding on March 20, 2014.

Name of Beneficial Owner Amount and Nature of
Beneficial Ownership
  Percentage 
       
CapGen Capital Group III LP
280 Park Avenue
40th Floor West
New York, NY 10017
  5,470,090(1)  21.1%
         

Second Curve Capital, LLC

Thomas K. Brown

237 Park Avenue, 9th Floor

New York, NY 10017

  1,637,243(2)  6.3%

(1)According to the Form 4 filed jointly by CapGen Capital Group III, LLC (“CapGen LLC”), Eugene A. Ludwig and Robert Goldstein on March 20, 2014 with the SEC with respect to Company Common Stock beneficially owned by each as of March 18, 2014. CapGen LLC is the sole general partner of CapGen LP, and both entities have the sole voting and dispositive power with respect to all 5,470,090 shares of Common Stock. Eugene Ludwig is the managing member of CapGen LLC and in such capacity has shared voting and dispositive power over all 5,470,090 shares of Common Stock. Mr. John Rose and Mr. Robert Goldstein, along with Mr. Ludwig, are the principal members of CapGen LLC (the “Principal Members”). While the Principal Members may be deemed to be the indirect beneficial owners of such shares, each disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares except for those shares that the individual holds directly.

(2)According to a Schedule 13G/A filed jointly by Second Curve Capital, LLC (“Second Curve”) and Thomas K. Brown on January 17, 2014, Second Curve and Mr. Brown have shared voting and dispositive power with respect to 1,637,243 shares of the Company’s Common Stock. The Schedule 13G/A provides that Second Curve is an investment adviser, and a parent holding company or control person. In addition, the Schedule 13 G/A indicates that the shares of common stock listed on the Schedule 13G/A are owned of record by advisory clients of Second Curve and Mr. Brown, and that none of these clients is known to own more than 5% of the Company’s Common Stock. The Schedule 13G/A also reports that Mr. Brown disclaims beneficial ownership of the Company’s Common Stock reported in the Schedule 13G/A except to the extent of his pecuniary interest therein.

Ownership of Directors and Executive Officers

Name of Beneficial Owner Amount and Nature of
Beneficial Ownership
  Percentage 
       
Dennis J. Arczynski  21,698(1)    
Stephen E. Bohner  26,534(2)  * 
John H. Crane  8,151(3)  * 
T. Michael Crook  56,904(4)  * 
H. Gilbert Culbreth, Jr.  53,672(5)  * 
Julie H. Daum  1,315     
Christopher E. Fogal  17,215(6)  * 
Maryann Goebel  1,500     
Roger O. Goldman  56,190(7)  * 
Robert B. Goldstein  5,470,426(8)  21.1%
Dale M. Hudson  371,937(9)  1.4%
Dennis S. Hudson, Jr.  315,257(10)  1.2%
Dennis S. Hudson, III  315,943(11)  1.2%
Thomas E. Rossin  9,939(12)  * 
Edwin E. Walpole, III  89,779(13)  * 
Maria G. Frias  3,825(14)  * 
William R. Hahl  18,768(15)  * 
David D. Houdeshell  1,000   * 
H. Russell Holland, III  0   

*

         
All directors and executive officers as a group (19 persons)  6,593,999   25.4%

* Less than 1%

(1)Includes 1,672 shares held in a limited liability company, as to which shares Mr. Arczynski has sole voting and investment power. Also includes 9,110 shares held jointly with his wife, as to which shares Mr. Arczynski may be deemed to share both voting and investment power. Also includes 7,916 shares held in the Bank’s Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan for which receipt of such shares has been deferred, and as to which shares Mr. Arczynski has no voting or dispositive power.

(2)Includes 6,109 shares held in the Bank’s Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan for which receipt of such shares has been deferred, and as to which shares Mr. Bohner has no voting or dispositive power.

(3)Includes 7,259 shares held jointly with Mr. Crane’s wife, as to which shares Mr. Crane may be deemed to share both voting and investment power.

(4)Includes 17,800 shares held jointly with Mr. Crook’s wife and 2,800 shares held by Mr. Crook’s wife, as to which shares Mr. Crook may be deemed to share both voting and investment power. Also includes 26,931 shares held in the Bank’s Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan for which receipt of such shares has been deferred, and as to which shares Mr. Crook has no voting or dispositive power.

(5)Includes 26,000 shares held in a family limited liability company and 8,200 shares held in a family sub-S corporation, as to which shares Mr. Culbreth has sole voting and investment power. Also includes 1,000 shares held jointly with Mr. Culbreth’s children and 10,200 shares held jointly with his wife, as to which shares Mr. Culbreth may be deemed to share both voting and investment power.
(6)Includes 4,490 shares held jointly with Mr. Fogal’s wife and 738 shares held by Mr. Fogal’s wife, as to which shares Mr. Fogal may be deemed to share both voting and investment power. Also includes 626 shares held in the Bank’s Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan for which receipt of such shares has been deferred, and as to which shares Mr. Fogal has no voting or dispositive power.

(7)Includes 15,860 shares held in IRAs, as to which shares Mr. Goldman shares both voting and investment power with his wife. Also includes 1,200 shares held in a special needs trust of which Mr. Goldman’s wife is trustee, as to which shares Mr. Goldman may be deemed to share voting and investment power and as to which Mr. Goldman disclaims beneficial ownership. Also includes 24,347 shares held in the Bank’s Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan for which receipt of such shares has been deferred, and as to which shares Mr. Goldman has no voting or dispositive power. Also includes 11,111 shares that Mr. Goldman has the right to acquire by exercising options that are exercisable within 60 days after the Record Date.

(8)Includes 5,470,091 shares held by CapGen LP, which is wholly owned by CapGen LLC. Mr. Goldstein is a principal and a member of the investment committee of CapGen LLC. Mr. Goldstein may be deemed to share both voting and investment power with respect to these shares, but disclaims beneficial ownership of such shares, except to the extent of his pecuniary interest therein.

(9)Includes 291,225 shares held by Monroe Partners, Ltd., a family limited partnership (“Monroe Partners”), of which Mr. Hudson and his wife, Mary T. Hudson, are general partners. Mr. Hudson may be deemed to share both voting and investment power with respect to such shares with the other general partner, but disclaims beneficial ownership, except to the extent of his 50 percent interest in Monroe Partners. Also includes 73,376 shares held jointly with Mr. Hudson’s wife, as to which shares Mr. Hudson may be deemed to share voting and investment power. Also includes 7,191 shares held by Mr. Hudson’s wife, as to which shares Mr. Hudson may be deemed to share voting and investment power and as to which Mr. Hudson disclaims beneficial ownership. Also includes 145 shares held in the Company’s Retirement Savings Plan.

(10)Includes 224,356 shares held by Sherwood Partners, Ltd., a family limited partnership (“Sherwood Partners”), of which Mr. Hudson and his son, Dennis S. Hudson, III, are general partners, and Mr. Hudson and his children are limited partners. Mr. Hudson may be deemed to share voting and investment power with respect to such shares, but disclaims beneficial ownership, except to the extent of his 1.0% interest in Sherwood Partners.

(11)Includes 224,356 shares held by Sherwood Partners, of which Mr. Hudson and his father, Dennis S. Hudson, Jr., are general partners. Mr. Hudson may be deemed to share voting and investment power with respect to such shares with the other general partners, but disclaims beneficial ownership, except to the extent of his 35.0 percent interest in Sherwood Partners and his beneficial interest in trusts having a 53.2 percent interest in Sherwood Partners. Also includes 49,386 shares held jointly with Mr. Hudson’s wife which were pledged as security for a margin loan, as to which shares Mr. Hudson may be deemed to share voting and investment power. Also includes 31,784 shares held in the Company’s Retirement Savings Plan, and 6,000 shares that Mr. Hudson has the right to acquire by exercising options that are exercisable within 60 days after the Record Date. Also includes 280 shares held by Mr. Hudson’s wife as custodian for her son, as to which shares Mr. Hudson may be deemed to share both voting and investment power and as to which Mr. Hudson disclaims beneficial ownership.

(12)Includes 200 shares held by Mr. Rossin’s wife, as to which shares Mr. Rossin may be deemed to share both voting and investment power and as to which Mr. Rossin disclaims beneficial ownership.

(13)Includes 791 shares held jointly with Mr. Walpole’s daughter and 810 shares held by a corporation in which Mr. Walpole is a principal, as to which shares Mr. Walpole may be deemed to share both voting and investment power. Also includes 188 shares held in the Bank’s Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan for which receipt of such shares has been deferred, and as to which shares Mr. Walpole has no voting or dispositive power.

(14)Includes 1,136 shares held in the Company’s Retirement Savings Plan and 2,389 shares held in the Company’s Employee Stock Purchase Plan. Also includes 300 shares that Ms. Frias has the right to acquire by exercising options that are exercisable within 60 days after the Record Date.

(15)Includes 11,240 shares held jointly with Mr. Hahl’s wife and 78 shares held by Mr. Hahl as custodian for his granddaughters, as to which shares Mr. Hahl may be deemed to share both voting and investment power. Also includes 5,801 shares held in the Company’s Retirement Savings Plan and 1,000 shares that Mr. Hahl has the right to acquire by exercising options that are exercisable within 60 days after the Record Date.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

 

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended requires the Company’s directors and executive officers, and persons who beneficially own more than 10 percent10% of the Company’s Common Stock,common stock, to file with the SEC initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of Common Stockcommon stock and other equity securities of the Company. Directors, executive officers and persons beneficially owning more than 10 percent10% of the Company’s Common Stockcommon stock are required to furnish the Company with copies of all Section 16(a) reports they file. Based on the Company’s review of such reports and written representations from the reporting persons, the Company believes that, during and with respect to fiscal year 2013,2016, all filing requirements applicable to its directors, executive officers and beneficial owners of more than 10 percent10% of its Common Stockcommon stock were complied with in a timely manner, except for:

 

·The Form 4 for Roger O. GoldmanDennis J. Arczynski filed with the SEC on February 1, 2013January 20, 2016 which reported the acquisition of 5,0008,255 shares of Common Stockcommon stock on January 29, 2013.14, 2016. The Company believes that the Form 4 filed on March 19, 2014February 17, 2017 reflects Mr. Goldman’sArczynski’s current holdings.

·The Form 4 for Stephen E. Bohner filed with the SEC on March 6, 2013April 11, 2016 which reported the acquisitionsale of 49,000four shares of Common Stockcommon stock on March 1, 2013.18, 2016. The Company believes that the Form 4 filed on March 20, 2014February 17, 2017 reflects Mr. Bohner’s current holdings.

·The Form 4 for Dennis S. Hudson, IIIJulie H. Daum filed with the SEC on July 22, 2013May 23, 2016 which reported the grantpurchase of an option to buy 97,0005,000 shares of Common Stockcommon stock on June 28, 2013.May 4, 2016. The Company believes that the Form 4 filed on January 14, 2014February 17, 2017 reflects Mr. Hudson’sMs. Daum’s current holdings.

·The Form 4 for David D. HoudeshellMaryann Goebel filed with the SEC on July 22, 2013June 2, 2016 which reported the grantpurchase of an option to buy 21,0005,850 shares of Common Stockcommon stock on June 28, 2013. The Company believes that the Form 5 filed on January 29, 2014 reflects Mr. Houdeshell’s current holdings.

·The Form 4 for William R. Hahl filed on July 22, 2013 which reported the grant of an option to buy 25,000 shares of Common Stock on June 28, 2013. The Company believes that the Form 5 filed on January 30, 2014 reflects Mr. Hahl’s current holdings.

·The Form 4 for Maria Frias filed on July 22, 2013 which reported the grant of an option to buy 12,000 shares of Common Stock on June 28, 2013.May 25, 2016. The Company believes that the Form 4 filed on March 20, 2014February 8, 2017 reflects Ms. Frias’sGoebel’s current holdings.

 

Other Matters

·The Form 4 for Edwin E. Walpole, III filed on November 15, 2013 which reported the acquisition of 44,500 shares of Common Stock on November 11, 2013. The Company believes that the Form 4 filed on March 20, 2014 reflects Mr. Walpole’s current holdings.PRINCIPAL OFFICES

 

60

PROPOSAL 2

RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITOR

The Audit Committee, acting pursuant to authority delegated to it by the Boardprincipal executive offices of Directors, appointed Crowe Horwath LLP, an independent registered certified public accounting firm, as independent auditors for Seacoast are located at 815 Colorado Avenue, P. O. Box 9012, Stuart, Florida 34995, and its subsidiaries on March 5, 2014 and has appointed Crowe Horwath LLP to serve as the Company’s independent auditor for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2014. Although ittelephone number is not required to do so, the Board of Directors is submitting the Audit Committee’s appointment of Crowe Horwath LLP for ratification by the shareholders in order to ascertain the views of the shareholders regarding such appointment and as a matter of good corporate practice. If the shareholders should not ratify the appointment of Crowe Horwath LLP, the Audit Committee will reconsider the appointment.

Representatives of Crowe Horwath LLP will be present at the Annual Meeting and will be given the opportunity to make a statement on behalf of the firm, if they so desire, and will also be available to respond to appropriate questions from shareholders. Representatives of KPMG LLP will also be present at the Annual Meeting and will be available to respond to appropriate questions from shareholders.

All shares represented by valid proxies received pursuant to this solicitation and not revoked before they are exercised will be voted in the manner specified therein. If no specification is made, the proxies will be voted for the ratification of the appointment of Crowe Horwath LLP for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2014.

Ratification of this proposal requires approval by the affirmative vote of a majority of votes cast at the Annual Meeting.

The Board of Directors unanimously recommends a vote "FOR" Proposal 2.(772) 287-4000.

 

61
107 

AVAILABILITY OF FORM 10-K

 

Audit Committee Report

The Audit Committee is currently comprised of three directors, Christopher E. Fogal (Chair), T. Michael Crook and Maryann Goebel. Messrs. Fogal (Chairman), Culbreth and Crook were the members of the Audit Committee in 2013 and the first quarter of 2014.

The purpose of the Audit Committee (the “Committee”) is to assist the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida (the “Company”) in its general oversight of the Company’s accounting, auditing and financial reporting practices. Management is primarily responsible for the Company’s financial statements, systems of internal controls and compliance with applicable legal and regulatory requirements. The Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, KPMG LLP for the year ended December 31, 2013, is responsible for performing an independent audit of the consolidated financial statements and expressing an opinion on the conformity of those financial statements with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, as well as expressing an opinion (pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting.

The members of the Committee are not professional auditors, and their functions are not intended to duplicate or to certify the activities of management and the independent registered public accounting firm, nor can the Committee certify that the Company’s registered public accounting firm is “independent” under applicable rules. The Committee serves a board-level oversight role, in which it provides advice, counsel and direction to management and the independent registered public accounting firm on the basis of the information it receives, discussions with management and the independent registered public accounting firm, and the experience of the Committee’s members in business, financial and accounting matters. To carry out its responsibilities, the Committee held seven meetings in 2013.

In the performance of its oversight responsibilities, the Committee has reviewed and discussed with management and KPMG LLP the audited financial statements of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2013. Management represented to the Committee that all financial statements were prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and that these statements fairly present the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods described. The Committee has relied upon this representation without any independent verification, except for the work of KPMG LLP. The Committee also discussed these statements with KPMG LLP, both with and without management present, and has relied upon their reported opinion on these financial statements. The Committee’s review included discussion with KPMG LLP of the matters required to be discussed under Public Company Accounting Oversight Board standards.

With respect to the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, the Committee, among other things, discussed with KPMG LLP matters relating to its independence and received from KPMG LLPUpon the written disclosures and the letter requiredrequest of any person whose proxy is solicited by applicable requirementsthis Proxy Statement, Seacoast will furnish to such person without charge (other than for exhibits) a copy of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding the independent accountant’s communications with the Committee concerning independence.

On the basis of these reviews and discussions, and subject to the limitations of its role, the Committee recommended that the Board approve the inclusion of the Company’s audited financial statements in the Company’sSeacoast’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013, for filing2016, including financial statements and schedules thereto, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.SEC. Requests may be made to Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida, c/o Corporate Secretary, P.O. Box 9012, Stuart, Florida 34995.

 

The Audit Committee:
Christopher E. Fogal, Chairman
T. Michael Crook
H. Gilbert Culbreth, Jr.SOLICITATION OF PROXIES; EXPENSES

 

March 5, 2014

RELATIONSHIP WITH INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Change in Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

On March 5, 2014, the Audit Committee approved the engagement of Crowe Horwath LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2014. Crowe Horwath LLP’s engagement as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm commenced on March 5, 2014.

Effective March 20, 2014, the Audit Committee dismissed KPMG LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm.

During the fiscal years ended December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, and the subsequent interim period through March 5, 2014, the Company has not consulted with Crowe Horwath LLP regarding either (i) the application of accounting principles to a specific transaction, either completed or proposed; or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on the Company’s consolidated financial statements, and neither a written report was provided to the Company or oral advice was provided that Crowe Horwath LLP concluded was an important factor considered by the Company in reaching a decision as to the accounting, auditing or financial reporting issue; or (ii) any matter that was either the subject of a disagreement, as that term is defined in Regulation S-K 304(a)(1)(iv) and the related instructions to Regulation S-K 304, or a reportable event, as that term is defined in Regulation S-K 304(a)(1)(v). The Company has not consulted Crowe Horwath regarding any accounting matter during the two fiscal years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012.

During the two fiscal years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, and from January 1, 2014 through March 20, 2014, there were no: (1) disagreements with KPMG on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedures, which disagreements if not resolved to their satisfaction would have caused them to make reference in connection with their opinion to the subject matter of the disagreement, or (2) reportable events, as that term is defined in Regulation S-K 304(a)(1)(v), except that as of December 31, 2013, management concluded that there was a material weakness in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting because the Company did not have a control designed to provide for an effective review of the accounting for previously recorded charge-offs, a non-routine matter, related to a matured troubled debt restructured loan. This control deficiency resulted in a misstatement to the allowance for loan losses in the Company’s third quarter earnings press release issued on October 28, 2013, and allowed for a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement would not have been prevented or detected on a timely basis. The Company filed a Form 8-K on November 12, 2013 updating and correcting the prior earnings press release, and the Company’s Form 10-Q for the third quarter was filed with the corrected items on November 14, 2013. Although the error was corrected prior to the filing of the Company’s third quarter Form 10-Q, management did not complete its evaluation of the control deficiency until the fourth quarter of 2013.

The Company provided KPMG LLP with a copy of the above disclosures and requested that KPMG LLP furnish the Company with a letter addressed to the SEC stating whether or not it agreed with the statements made above. A copy of KPMG’s letter dated March 25, 2014 agreeing with the statements was attached as Exhibit 16.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K/A filed with the SEC on March 25, 2014.

Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm’s Fees

The Company previously entered into an engagement agreement with KPMG LLP which set forth the terms by which KPMG LLP would perform audit services for the Company. KPMG LLP has advised the Company that neither the firm nor any of its partners has any direct or material interest in the Company except as auditors and independent certified public accountants of the Company.

The following table presents fees for professional audit services rendered by KPMG LLP in each of the last two fiscal years in each of the following categories, including expenses:

  2012  2013 
Audit Fees(1) $640,500  $787,000 
Audit-Related Fees (2) $40,000  $25,000 
Tax Fees $0  $0 
All Other Fees $0  $0 

(1)Includes the aggregate fees billed by KPMG LLP for professional services and expenses rendered for the audit of the Company’s consolidated financial statements, reviews of consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s Forms 10-Q filed during the respective fiscal year, and audit of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Also includes the aggregate fees billed for professional services performed in connection with the Company’s filing of certain registration statements and the related issuance of comfort letters and consents.

(2)Includes the aggregate fees billed by KPMG LLP for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit of the Company’s financial statements and are not reported under “Audit Fees.” These services primarily relate to audits of the Company’s compliance with certain requirements applicable to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) assisted programs, and related attestation reporting thereon.

Pre-Approval Policy

Under the Audit Committee’s Charter, the Audit Committee is required to approve in advance the terms of all audit services provided to the Company as well as all permissible audit-related and non-audit services to be provided by the independent auditors. All services set forth above under the captions “Audit Fees”, “Audit-Related Fees”, “Tax Fees”, and “All Other Fees” were approved by the Company’s Audit Committee pursuant to SEC Regulation S-X Rule 2-.01(c)(7)(i).

PROPOSAL 3

ADVISORY (NON-BINDING) VOTE ON COMPENSATION OF NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

In accordance with the Exchange Act, we are required to include in this Proxy Statement and present at the Annual Meeting a non-binding shareholder vote to approve the compensation of our named executive officers, as disclosed in this Proxy Statement pursuant to the compensation rules of the SEC. This Proposal, commonly known as a “say-on-pay” proposal, gives shareholders the opportunity to endorse or not endorse the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers as disclosed in this Proxy Statement. The Proposal will be presented at the Annual Meeting in the form of the following resolution:

RESOLVED, that the holders of Common Stock of the Company approve the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers as disclosed in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the compensation tables and related material in the Company’s Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting.

This advisory vote will not be binding on the Company’s Board of Directors and may not be construed as overruling a decision by the Board of Directors or creating or implying any additional fiduciary duty on the Board of Directors.  Nor will it affect any compensation paid or awarded to any executive.  The Compensation and Governance Committee and the Board of Directors will take into account the outcome of the vote when considering future executive compensation arrangements.

The purpose of our compensation policies and procedures is to attract and retain experienced, qualified talent critical to our long-term success and enhancement of shareholder value.  Seacoast’s Board of Directors believes that our compensation policies and procedures achieve this objective.

This Proposal 3 requires approval by the affirmative vote of a majority of votes cast at the Annual Meeting.

The Board of Directors unanimously recommends aof the Company is soliciting proxies to be voted at the Annual Meeting. The Company will bear the cost of preparing, printing and mailing the proxy materials and soliciting proxies for the Annual Meeting. In addition to the solicitation of shareholders of record by mail, telephone, electronic mail, facsimile or personal contact, Seacoast will be contacting brokers, dealers, banks, and/or voting trustees or their nominees who can be identified as record holders of the Company’s common stock; such holders, after inquiry by Seacoast, will provide information concerning quantities of proxy materials needed to supply such information to beneficial owners, and Seacoast will reimburse them for the reasonable expense of mailing proxy materials. Seacoast may retain other unaffiliated third parties to solicit proxies and pay the reasonable expenses and charges of such third parties for their services.

NOTICE OF BUSINESS TO COME BEFORE THE MEETING

Management of Seacoast does not know of any matters to be brought before the Annual Meeting other than those described above. If any other matters properly come before the Annual Meeting, the persons designated as proxies will vote FOR” Proposal 3.on such matters in accordance with their best judgment.

SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR 2015

Shareholder Proposals for 2018

SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR INCLUSION IN 2018 PROXY STATEMENT

 

To be considered for inclusion in the Company’s proxy statement and proxy card for the 20152018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, a shareholder proposal must be received at the Company’s principal executive offices no later than December 10, 2014,7, 2017, which is 120 calendar days before the one-year anniversary of the date on which the Company first mailed this Proxy Statement.

108

SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR PRESENTATION AT 2018 ANNUAL MEETING

 

If you do not wish to submit a proposal for inclusion in next year’s proxy materials, but instead wish to present it directly at the 20152018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, you must give timely written notice of the proposal to the Company’s Secretary.Secretary pursuant to the Company’s advance notice provisions. To be timely, the notice (including a notice recommending a director candidate) must be delivered to the Company’s principal executive offices no fewer than 60 nor more than 90 days before the one-year anniversary of the date of the Annual Meeting. To be timely, the written notice (including a notice recommending a director candidate) must be received no earlier than February 20, 201524, 2018 and no later than March 22, 2015.26, 2018. The notice must describe your proposal in reasonable detail and provide certain other information required by the Company’s Articles of Incorporation. A copy of the Company’s Articles of Incorporation is available upon request from the Company’s Secretary.

 

ADDITIONAL VOTING INFORMATION

OTHER MATTERS

Voting at Annual Meeting

Shares represented by valid proxies and voting instruction forms that are received on time will be voted as specified. If you sign and return your proxy card or voting instruction form but do not provide voting instructions, your shares represented by the proxy will be voted as recommended by our Board of Directors as indicated below:

ProposalBoard
Recommendation
1Election of DirectorsFOR ALL
2Ratification of AuditorFOR
3Advisory Vote on Executive CompensationFOR

If any other matters are properly presented at the Annual Meeting for action, the persons named and acting as proxy will have the discretion to vote for you on these matters in accordance with their best judgment. We do not currently expect that any other matters will be properly presented for action at the Annual Meeting.

 

ManagementEach share of Seacoast doescommon stock is entitled to one vote on each matter properly brought before the meeting.

109

Record Date

You may vote all common shares that you owned as of the close of business on March 23, 2017, which is the record date for the meeting.

Forms of Ownership of Shares

If you receive more than one proxy card or notice, it means you have multiple holdings.

You may own common shares in one or more ways, including:

·Directly in your name as the shareholder of record (which may be held individually, jointly, or another title), including shares purchased through Seacoast’s Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan or restricted stock awards issued to employees under our long-term incentive plans;

·Indirectly through a bank, broker or other nominee in “street name”;

·Indirectly through Seacoast’s Retirement Savings Plan or Employee Stock Purchase Plan.

If your shares of common stock are registered directly in your name, we are sending the proxy materials directly to you. If you hold our shares in street name, your bank, broker or other nominee is sending proxy materials to you and you must direct them how to vote on your behalf by completing the voting instruction form that accompanies your proxy materials or by following the instructions in the notice you received.

If you are a participant in Seacoast’s Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan, follow the instructions on the Notice or proxy card to provide voting instructions to the Trustee. Shares held in your plan account will be combined and voted at the Annual Meeting in the same manner in which you voted those shares registered in your own name either by proxy or in person.

If you are a participant in Seacoast’s Retirement Savings Plan or Employee Stock Purchase Plan, your voting instructions must be received by May 18, 2017 (the “cut-off date”) to allow sufficient time for the trustees to vote. When your voting instructions are received by the cut-off date, your shares in these plans will be voted as directed by you. For the shares in your account in Seacoast’s Retirement Savings Plan, if you do not knowsubmit your voting instructions by following the instructions on the Notice or proxy card, then the trustee of anythe Retirement Savings Plan will vote, or not vote, in its sole discretion, the shares of common stock in your account. For shares held in your account in the Employee Stock Purchase Plan, your shares will not be voted if you do not give voting instructions as to such shares by proxy.

Please follow the instructions on each notice or proxy card to ensure that all of your shares are voted.

110

Street Name Holders

If you are a beneficial owner and a broker, bank or other nominee is the record holder (which is commonly referred to as “street name”), then you received the notice of the Annual Meeting or proxy materials from the record holder. You have the right to direct your broker or nominee how to vote your shares, and such broker or other nominee is required to vote the shares in accordance with your instructions. Your broker or nominee should have given you instructions for you to provide direction on how to vote your shares. It will then be the record holder’s responsibility to vote your shares for you in the manner you direct. Generally, brokers and other record holders may vote on discretionary or routine matters, but cannot vote on non-routine or non-discretionary matters unless they have received voting instructions from street name holder. We therefore encourage you to provide directions to your broker as to how you want your shares voted on all matters to be brought before the Annual Meeting other than those described above. Meeting.

If any other matters properly come beforeyour shares are held in street name, you are invited to attend the Annual Meeting; however, you may not vote your shares of common stock held in street name in person at the Annual Meeting unless you request and obtain a power of attorney or other authority from your broker or other nominee who holds your shares and bring it to the persons designated as proxies willAnnual Meeting. Even if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, we ask that you vote onin advance of the Annual Meeting in case your plans change.

Effect of not Casting Your Vote

If you hold your shares in street name, you have the right to direct your broker or nominee how to vote your shares, and such mattersbroker or other nominee is required to vote the shares in accordance with their best judgment.your instructions. Your broker or nominee should have given you instructions for you to provide direction on how to vote your shares. It is then the record holder’s responsibility to vote your shares for you in the manner you direct.

 

OTHER INFORMATIONUnder the rules of various securities exchanges, brokers and other record holders may generally vote on discretionary or routine matters, but cannot vote on non-routine or non-discretionary matters, such as the election of directors, unless they have received voting instructions from the person for whom they are holding shares. Proposals 1 and 3 are considered non-routine matters, and cannot be voted on by your broker without your instructions. We therefore encourage you to provide directions to your broker as to how you want your shares voted on all matters to be voted on at the meeting.

 

Principal OfficesRevocation of Proxies

If your shares of common stock are registered directly in your name, you may revoke your proxy and change your vote at any time before the polls close at the Annual Meeting. You may do this by:

·timely submitting another proxy via the telephone or internet;

·delivering to Seacoast a written notice bearing a date later than the date of the proxy card, stating that you revoke the proxy, with such written notice to be sent to: 815 Colorado Avenue, P. O. Box 9012, Stuart, Florida 34995, Attention: Corporate Secretary;

111

·signing and delivering to Seacoast a proxy card relating to the same shares and bearing a later date; or

·attending the meeting and voting in person by written ballot, although attendance at the meeting will not, by itself, revoke a proxy.

Also, please note that if you have voted through your broker, bank or other nominee and you wish to change your vote, you must follow the instructions received from such entity to change your vote.

Quorum and Required Vote

To hold a vote on any proposal, a quorum must be present in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting. A quorum is a majority of the total votes entitled to be cast by the holders of the outstanding shares of common stock as of the close of business on the record date.

In determining whether a quorum exists at the Annual Meeting for purposes of all matters to be voted on, all votes “for” or “against,” as well as all abstentions and broker non-votes, will be counted. A “broker non-vote” occurs when a nominee does not have discretionary voting power with respect to that proposal and has not received instructions from the beneficial owner.

On the Record Date, there were 40,729,656 shares of common stock issued, outstanding and entitled to be voted, which were held by approximately 2,318 holders of record. Therefore, at least 20,364,829 shares need to be present at the Annual Meeting or represented by proxy in order for a quorum to exist.

If a quorum is not present at the scheduled time of the Annual Meeting, a majority of the shareholders present or represented by proxy may adjourn the Annual Meeting until a quorum is present. The time and place of the adjourned Annual Meeting will be announced at the time of the adjournment, if any, and no other notice will be given. An adjournment will have no effect on the business that may be conducted at the Annual Meeting. If the Annual Meeting is adjourned more than 120 days after the date fixed for the original Annual Meeting, the Board of Directors must fix a new record date to determine the shareholders entitled to vote at the adjourned Annual Meeting.

To elect directors and adopt the other proposals at the 2017 Annual Meeting, the following votes are required:

ProposalVote RequiredDo abstentions count
as votes cast? 
Is broker 
discretionary
voting allowed?  
1Election of DirectorsPlurality vote(1)NoNo  
2Ratification of AuditorAffirmative vote of amajority of votes castNoYes  
3Advisory (Non-binding) Voteon Executive CompensationAffirmative vote of amajority of votes castNoNo  

112

(1)Under our Bylaws, all elections of directors are decided by plurality vote. However, notwithstanding the plurality standard, in an uncontested election for directors, which is the case for the election under Proposal 1, our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that if any director nominee receives a greater number of votes “withheld” from his or her election than votes “for” such election, then the director will promptly tender his or her resignation to the Board following certification of the shareholder vote, with such resignation to be effective upon acceptance by the Board of Directors. The CGC would then review and make a recommendation to the Board of Directors as to whether the Board should accept the resignation, and the Board would ultimately decide whether to accept the resignation. The Company will disclose its decision-making process regarding the resignation in a Form 8-K furnished to the SEC. In contested elections, the required vote would be a plurality of votes cast and the resignation policy would not apply. Full details of this policy are set forth in our Corporate Governance Guidelines, available on our website at www.seacoastbanking.com.

Cumulative voting is not permitted. Abstentions and broker non-votes, if any, will not be counted for purposes of determining whether any of the proposals have received sufficient votes for approval, but will count for purposes of determining whether or not a quorum is present. So long as a quorum is present, abstentions and broker non-votes will have no effect on any of the matters presented for a vote at the Annual Meeting.

Multiple Shareholders Sharing the Same Address

 

The principal executive officesSEC permits delivery of Seacoastone copy of the proxy materials to shareholders who have the same address and last name under a procedure referred to as “householding”. We do not utilize householding for our shareholders of record. However, if you hold your shares through a broker, bank or other nominee, you may receive only one copy of the notice and, as applicable, any additional proxy materials that are located at 815 Colorado Avenue, P. O. Box 9012, Stuart, Florida 34995, and its telephone number is (772) 287-4000.delivered.

 

If you receive a single set of proxy materials as a result of householding, and you would like to have separate copies of proxy materials mailed to you in the future, please contact your broker, bank or other nominee. However, if you want to receive a paper proxy or notice or other proxy materials for purposes of this year’s Annual Report on Form 10-KMeeting, follow the instructions included in the notice that was sent to you.

 

Upon* * * *

You can find the written requestdirections to our Annual Meeting on the inside back cover of any person whosethis proxy is solicitedstatement. Whether or not you plan to attend the meeting, we hope you will vote as soon as possible. You may vote over the internet, as well as by telephone. You also may vote your shares by requesting a paper proxy card and completing, signing and returning it by mail. Please review the instructions on each of your voting options described in this Proxy Statement, Seacoast will furnish to such person without charge (other than for exhibits) a copy of Seacoast’s Annual Report on Form 10-K forproxy statement, as well as in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013, including financial statements and schedules thereto, as filed withnotice you received in the SEC. Requests may be made to Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida, c/o Corporate Secretary, P.O. Box 9012, Stuart, Florida 34995.mail.

 

 By Order of the Board of Directors,
 DENNIS S. HUDSON III
 Chairman & Chief Executive Officer
April 6, 2017

113

APPENDIX A
INFORMATION REGARDING NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES

   

April 9, 2014This letter contains financial information determined by methods other than Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”). Management uses these non-GAAP financial measures in its analysis of the Company’s performance and believes these presentations provide useful supplemental information, and a clearer understanding of the Company’s performance. The Company believes the non-GAAP measures enhance investors’ understanding of the Company’s business and performance and if not provided would be requested by the investor community. These measures are also useful in understanding performance trends and facilitate comparisons with the performance of other financial institutions. The limitations associated with operating measures are the risk that persons might disagree as to the appropriateness of items comprising these measures and that different companies might calculate these measures differently. The Company provides reconciliations between GAAP and these non-GAAP measures. These disclosures should not be considered an alternative to GAAP. Certain prior period amounts have been revised to conform to the current period presentation.

(Dollars in thousands except per share data) 2016  2015  2014  2013 
             
Net Income $29,202  $22,141  $5,696  $47,916 
                 
Security gains  (368)  (161)  (469)  (419)
                 
BOLI income (benefits upon death)  (464)  0   0   0 
                 
Bargain purchase gain  0   (416)  0   0 
                 
Severance  1,222   898   1,199   67 
                 
Merger related charges  8,673   3,775   4,544   0 
                 
Branch closure charges and costs related to expense initiatives  2,490   0   4,261   0 
                 
Early redemption cost for FHLB advances  1,777   0   0   0 
                 
Other  0   281   26   (1,315)
                 
Brand Refresh  0   0   697   0 
                 
Stock compensation expense and other incentive costs related to improved outlook  0   0   1,213   0 
                 
Reversal of deferred tax asset valuation allowance  0   0   0   (42,993)
                 
Tax effect of adjustments  (5,077)  (1,651)  (4,734)  673 
                 
Adjusted net income $37,455  $24,867  $12,433  $3,929 
                 
Average shares outstanding (000)  37,508   33,744   27,717   19,650 
                 
Adjusted Earnings per Diluted Share $1.00  $0.74  $0.45  $0.20 

A-1

 

 A-2

  Fourth Quarter  Fourth Quarter  Fourth Quarter 
(Dollars in thousands except per share data) 2016  2015  2014 
             
Net Income $10,771  $6,036  $(1,517)
             
Security gains  (7)  (1)  (108)
             
Bargain purchase gain  0   (416)  0 
             
Total Adjustments to Revenue  (7)  (417)  (108)
             
Severance  165   187   478 
             
Merger related charges  559   1,043   2,723 
             
Branch closure charges and costs related to expense initiatives  0   0   4,261 
             
Brand Refresh  0   0   697 
             
Miscellaneous losses  0   48   119 
             
Stock compensation expense and other incentive costs related to improved outlook  0   0   1,213 
             
Total Adjustments to Noninterest Expense  724   1,278   9,491 
             
Effective tax rate on adjustments  (152)  (328)  (3,753)
             
Adjusted Net Income $11,336  $6,569  $4,113 
             
Earnings per diluted share, as reported $0.28  $0.18  $(0.05)
             
Adjusted Earnings per Diluted Share $0.30  $0.19  $0.12 
             
Average shares outstanding (000)  38,252   34,395   33,124 
             
Revenue $47,354  $37,299  $31,982 
             
Total Adjustments to Revenue  (7)  (417)  (108)
             
Adjusted Revenue $47,347  $36,882  $31,874 
             
Noninterest Expense $30,297  $27,169  $34,011 
             
Total Adjustments to Noninterest Expense  724   1,278   9,491 
             
Adjusted Noninterest Expense $29,573  $25,891  $24,520 

 A-3

 

  Fourth Quarter  Fourth Quarter  Fourth Quarter 
(Dollars in thousands except per share data) 2016  2015  2014 
             
Adjusted Noninterest Expense $29,573  $25,891  $24,520 
             
Foreclosed property expense & amortization of intangible  (641)  (324)  (528)
             
Net Adjusted Noninterest Expense $28,932  $25,567  $23,992 
             
Adjusted Revenue $47,347  $36,882  $31,874 
             
Impact of FTE adjustment  204   117   150 
             
Adjusted Revenue on a fully taxable equivalent basis $47,551  $36,999  $32,024 
             
Adjusted Efficiency Ratio  60.8%  69.1%  74.9%
             
Average assets $4,572,188  $3,463,277  $3,037,061 
             
Return on Average Assets (ROA)  0.94%  0.69%  -0.20%
             
Impact of adjustments for Adjusted Net Income  0.05%  0.06%  0.74%
             
Adjusted ROA  0.99%  0.75%  0.54%
             
Average Shareholders' Equity $437,077  $353,392  $319,233 
             
Less average goodwill and intangible assets  (79,620)  (34,457)  (33,803)
             
Average Tangible Equity $357,457  $318,935  $285,430 
             
Return on Average Shareholders' Equity  9.8%  6.8%  -1.9%
             
Impact of removing average intangible assets and related amortization  2.7%  1.1%  0.2%
             
Return on Average Tangible Common Equity (ROTCE)  12.5%  7.8%  -1.7%
             
Impact of adjustments for Adjusted Net Income  0.6%  0.7%  7.8%
             
Adjusted Return on Average Tangible Common Equity  13.1%  8.5%  6.1%

   

 
A-4 

 

LOCATION OF THE 2017 ANNUAL MEETING

Our 2017 Annual Meeting will be held at the Founder’s Room, Orlando Science Center.

Please use the address below for directions to the Orlando Science Center:

777 E Princeton St, Orlando, FL 32803

Taking Florida’s Turnpike

·Exit 259 to merge onto I-4 East

·Turn right onto Princeton St. from the exit ramp.

·Orlando Science Center will be on the left hand side with the OSC Parking Garage on the right hand side.

·Turn right at the traffic light into the parking garage.

·Park closest to the 2nd ramp of the garage and use the pedestrian walk way to enter into Orlando Science Center

Directions To The Orlando Science Center From I-4

·Exit I-4 at Princeton St. (Exit 85)

·If traveling eastbound on I-4 turn right onto Princeton St. from the exit ramp.

·If traveling westbound on I-4 turn left onto Princeton St. from the exit ramp. You will then be going east on Princeton St.

·Orlando Science Center will be on the left hand side with the OSC Parking Garage on the right hand side.

·Turn right at the traffic light into the parking garage.

·Park closest to the 2nd ramp of the garage and use the pedestrian walk way to enter into Orlando Science Center

Arriving by Car Service or Taxi:

If arriving by a car service, please direct drop off on level 2 of the parking garage and cross into the building by the pedestrian walkway.